Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:05:12.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hidden clusters beyond ethnic boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2022

Alejandro Peréz Velilla ,
Cody J. Moser  and
Paul E. Smaldino Open the ORCID record for Paul E. Smaldino [Opens in a new window]
Alejandro Peréz Velilla
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]; https://smaldino.com/wp/
Cody J. Moser
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]; https://smaldino.com/wp/
Paul E. Smaldino
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA. [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected]; https://smaldino.com/wp/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hidden cluster problems can manifest when broad ethnic categories are used as proxies for cultural traits, especially when traits are assumed to encode cultural distances between groups. We suggest a granular understanding of cultural trait distributions within and between ethnic categories is fundamental to the interpretation of heritability estimates as well as general behavioral outcomes.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e178
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Biswas, U. N., & Pandey, J. (1996). Mobility and perception of socioeconomic status among tribal and caste group. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(2), 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Colleran, H. (2020). Market integration reduces kin density in women's ego-networks in rural Poland. Nature Communications, 11, 266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466, 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44(1), 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2008). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schooler, C. (2010). Culture and social structure: The relevance of social structure to cultural psychology. In Cohen, D. (Ed.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 370–388). Guilford.Google Scholar
Schulz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. (2019). The church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366, eaau5141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaldino, P. E. (2019). Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behavioural Processes, 161, 108–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaldino, P. E., & Turner, M. A. (2021). Covert signaling is an adaptive communication strategy in diverse populations. Psychological Review, 129(4), 812–829. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar