Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:40:56.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further routes to psychological constructionism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2012

Courtney Humeny ,
Deirdre Kelly  and
Andrew Brook
Courtney Humeny
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. [email protected]@[email protected]/~abrook
Deirdre Kelly
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. [email protected]@[email protected]/~abrook
Andrew Brook
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada. [email protected]@[email protected]/~abrook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, we do two things. First, we sketch two further routes to psychological constructionism. They are complementary to Lindquist et al.'s meta-analyses and have potential to add new evidence. Second, we look at a challenging kind of case for constructionism, namely, emotional anomalies where there are correlated, and probably relevant, brain anomalies. Psychopaths are our example.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 153 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blair, R. (2005) Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy. Development and Psychopathology 17:865–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. (2008) The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: Functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopath. Transactions of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 12:2557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R., Colledge, E., Murray, L. & Mitchell, D. (2001) A selective impairment in the processing of sad and fearful expressions in children with psychopathic tendencies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 29:491–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blair, R., Mitchell, D., Peschardt, K., Colledge, E., Leonard, R., Shine, J., Murray, L. & Perrett, D. (2004) Reduced sensitivity to others' fearful expressions in psychopathic individuals. Personality and Individual Differences 37:1111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, H., Mallinckrodt, B. & Wu, L. (2005). Anger expression toward parents and depressive symptoms among undergraduates in Taiwan. The Counseling Psychologist 33:72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleckley, H. (1982) The mask of sanity. Mosby.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1993) Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48:384–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hare, R. (1991) The Hare psychopathy checklist – revised. Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Hart, S. D. & Hare, R. D. (1996) Psychopathy and risk assessment. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 9:380–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, A. & Newman, J. (2002) Deficient response modulation and emotion processing in low-anxious Caucasian psychopathic offenders: Results from a lexical decision task. Emotion 2: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, J. P., Curtin, J. J., Bertsch, J. D. & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2010) Attention moderates the fearlessness of psychopathic offenders. Biological Psychiatry 67:66–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patrick, C., Bradley, M. & Lang, P. (1993) Emotion in the criminal psychopath: Startle reflex modulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 102:82–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed