Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:53:25.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freud's dual process theory and the place of the a-rational

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2004

Linda A. W. Brakel  and
Howard Shevrin
Linda A. W. Brakel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI48109-0722
Howard Shevrin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI48109-0722
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In this commentary on Stanovich & West (S&W) we call attention to two points: (1) Freud's original dual process theory, which antedates others by some seventy-five years, deserves inclusion in any consideration of dual process theories. His concepts of primary and secondary processes (Systems 1 and 2, respectively) anticipate significant aspects of current dual process theories and provide an explanation for many of their characteristics. (2) System 1 is neither rational nor irrational, but instead a-rational. Nevertheless, both the a-rational System 1 and the rational System 2 can each have different roles in enhancing evolutionary fitness. Lastly, System 1 operations are incorrectly deemed “rational” whenever they increase evolutionary fitness.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , August 2003 , pp. 527 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

Commentary on Stanovich, K. E. and West, R. F. “Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?” BBS 23(5):645–726 [October 2000]