Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:49:09.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining why experimental behavior varies across cultures: A missing step in “The weirdest people in the world?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Edouard Machery
Edouard Machery
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. [email protected]/~machery/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, I argue that to properly assess the significance of the cross-cultural findings reviewed by Henrich et al., one needs to understand better the causes of the variation in performance in experimental tasks across cultures.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 101 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, H. C. (2005) Adaptations to predators and prey. In: The handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. Buss, D. M., pp. 200–23. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cronk, L. (2007) The influence of cultural framing on play in the trust game: A Maasai example. Evolution and Human Behavior 28(5):352–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M., Carroll, C., Sytsma, J. & Machery, E. (2010) Cross-cultural semantics and the speaker's/semantic reference distinction. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Fessler, D. M. T. & Machery, E. (forthcoming) Culture and cognition. In: Oxford handbook of philosophy and cognitive science, ed. Margolis, E., Samuels, R. & Stich, S. P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C. F., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q. & Tracer, D. (2005a) “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6):795–815; discussion 815–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Gintis, H., Fehr, E. & Camerer, C., eds. (2004) Foundations of human sociality: Economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K. & Smith, V. (1994) Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 7:346–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (forthcoming) Variation in intuitions about reference and ontological disagreements. In: A companion to relativism, ed. Hales, S. D.. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S. & Stich, S. (2004) Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition 92:B1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E., Olivola, C. Y. & de Blanc, M. (2009) Linguistic and metalinguistic intuitions in the philosophy of language. Analysis 69:689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. & Stich, S. P. (forthcoming) Experimental philosophy of language. In: The Routledge companion to philosophy of language, ed. Fara, D. G. & Russell, G.. Routledge.Google Scholar