Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:53:44.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The emperor has no blanket!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Vicente Raja Open the ORCID record for Vicente Raja [Opens in a new window] ,
Edward Baggs ,
Anthony Chemero  and
Michael L. Anderson
Vicente Raja
Affiliation:
Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, [email protected]://www.emrglab.org
Edward Baggs
Affiliation:
Department of Language and Communication, Danish Institute for Advanced Study, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, [email protected]://danish-ias.dk/people/edward-baggs-danish-ias/
Anthony Chemero
Affiliation:
Departments of Philosophy and Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, [email protected]://uc.academia.edu/TonyChemero
Michael L. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Brain and Mind Institute, Rotman Institute of Philosophy, Western University, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, [email protected]://www.emrglab.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While we applaud Bruineberg et al.'s analysis of the differences between Markov blankets and Friston blankets, we think it is not carried out to its ultimate consequences. There are reasons to think that, once Friston blankets are accepted as a theoretical construct, they do not do the work proponents of free energy principle (FEP) attribute to them. The emperor is indeed naked.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 45 , 2022 , e204
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguilera, M., Millidge, B., Tschantz, A., & Buckley, C. L. (2021). How particular is the physics of the free energy principle? Physics of Life Reviews, 40, 24–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2021.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biehl, M., Pollock, F. A., & Kanai, R. (2021). A technical critique of some parts of the free energy principle. Entropy, 23(3), 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Paolo, E., Thompson, E., & Beer, R. D. (2021). Laying down a forking path: Incompatibilities between enaction and the free energy principle. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d9v8fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friston, K. J. (2019). A free energy principle for a particular physics. [preprint] arXiv:1906.10184.Google Scholar
Raja, V. (2020). Embodiment and cognitive neuroscience: The forgotten tales. Philosophy and the Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09711-0Google Scholar
Raja, V., Valluri, D., Baggs, E., Chemero, A., & Anderson, M. L. (2021). The Markov blanket trick: On the scope of the free energy principle and active inference. Physics of Life Reviews, 39, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2021.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed