Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:49:49.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Don't throw the baby out with the math water: Why discounting the developmental foundations of early numeracy is premature and unnecessary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2008

Kevin Muldoon ,
Charlie Lewis  and
Norman Freeman
Kevin Muldoon
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United [email protected]://www.sls.hw.ac.uk/staffDetails.php?staff_id=37
Charlie Lewis
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Human Development, Psychology Department, Fylde College, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United [email protected]://www.psych.lancs.ac.uk/people/CharlieLewis.html
Norman Freeman
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, United [email protected]://psychology.psy.bris.ac.uk/people/normanfreeman.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We see no grounds for insisting that, because the concept natural number is abstract, its foundations must be innate. It is possible to specify domain general learning processes that feed into more abstract concepts of numerical infinity. By neglecting the messiness of children's slow acquisition of arithmetical concepts, Rips et al. present an idealized, unnecessarily insular, view of number development.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , December 2008 , pp. 663 - 664
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Freeman, N. H., Antonucci, C. & Lewis, C. (2000) Representation of the cardinality principle: Early conception of error in a counterfactual test. Cognition 74:71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haylock, D. & Cockburn, A. (2003) Understanding mathematics in the lower primary years. Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond modularity. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (2008) How to learn the natural numbers: Inductive inference and the acquisition of number concepts. Cognition 106:924–39.Google Scholar
Muldoon, K., Lewis, C. & Francis, B. (2007) Using cardinality to compare quantities: The role of social-cognitive conflict in the development of basic arithmetical skills. Developmental Science 10:694–711.Google Scholar
Muldoon, K., Lewis, C. & Freeman, N. H. (2003) Putting counting to work: Preschoolers' understanding of cardinal extension. International Journal of Educational Research 39:695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, K. P., Lewis, C. & Towse, J. (2005) Because it's there! Why children count, rather than infer, corresponding sets. Cognitive Development 20:472–91.Google Scholar