Adrian, E. D.The Basis of Sensation. London: Christophers, 1928. [GW]Google Scholar

Aiba, T. S. and Stevens, S. S.Relation of brightness to duration and luminance under light- and dark-adaptation. Vision Research. 4: 391–401, 1964. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allport, D. A.Temporal summation and phenomenal simultaneity: Experiments with the radius display. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 22: 686–701, 1970. [MC, GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpern, M. and Faris, J. J.Luminance-duration relationship in the electric response of the human retina. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 46: 845–50, 1956. [RAW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anglin, J. and Mansfield, R. J. W.On the brightness of short and long flashes. Perception and Psychophysics. 4: 161–62, 1968. [RM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnett, D. W.Spatial and temporal integration properties of units in first optic ganglion of dipterans. Journal of Neurophysiology. 35: 429–44, 1972. [MJ]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Averbach, E.The span of apprehension as a function of exposure durations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 2: 60–64, 1963. [RH]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babkoff, H. and Gombosh, D.Monaural and binaural temporal integration of noise bursts. Psychological Research. 39: 137–45, 1976. [HB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Babkoff, H., Sutton, S., and Zubin, J. A comparison of psychiatric patients and normal controls on the integration of auditory stimuli. Presented at symposium: Lateralized Hemispheric Function and Psychopathology. American Psychological Association, Toronto, 1978. [HB]Google Scholar

Bain, A.The Senses and the Intellect. London: Parker. Pp. 18–19, 1855. [FMc]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, H. B.Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations. Journal of Physiology. 136: 469–88, 1957. [GS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Temporal and spatial summation in human vision of different background intensities. Journal of Physiology. 141:337–50, 1958. [TF, GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, J. R. and Doty, R. W. SrResponse of units in the striate cortex of squirrel monkeys to visual and electrical stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. 37: 621–41, 1974. [MP]Google Scholar

Baru, A. V. Absolute thresholds and frequency difference limens as a function of sound duration in dogs deprived of the auditory cortex. In Gersuni, G. V. (ed.), Sensory Processes at the Neuronal and Behavioral Levels. New York: Academic Press, 1971. [HB]Google Scholar

Baumgardt, E. and Segal, J.Facilitation et inhibition parametrès de la fonction visuelle. L'Annèe Psychologique. 43–44:54–102, 1942–1943. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bazhin, E. F., Wasserman, L. I., and Tonkonogii, I. M.Auditory hallucinations and left temporal lobe pathology. Neuropsychologia. 13: 481–87, 1975. [HB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, C. A. and Killion, T. H.Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 3: 389–401, 1977. [MP]Google Scholar

Bellman, R.Perturbation Techniques in Mathematics, Physics, and Engineering. New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. [RM]Google Scholar

Bernhard, C. G.Contributions to the neurophysiology of the optic pathway. Acta physiologica Scandinavica. 1:Suppl. 1, 1940. [SS]Google Scholar

Bickford, R. G., Jacobson, J. L., and Cody, D. T. R.Nature of average evoked potentials of sound and other stimuli in man. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 112: 204–18, 1964. [FMc]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blackwell, H. R.Neural theories of simple visual discriminations. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 53: 129–60, 1963. [GS]Google Scholar

Blondel, A. and Rey, J.Sur la perception des lumières brèves à la limite de leur portée. Journal de Physiologie (Paris). 1: 530–50, 1911. [TF]Google Scholar

Blumenthal, Arthur L.The Process of Cognition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977. [AB]Google Scholar

Bowen, R. W., Pola, J., and Matin, L.Visual persistence: effects of flash luminance, duration and energy. Vision Research. 14: 295–303, 1974. [MC;GW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bowman, J. P. and Combs, C. M.The cerebrocortical projection of hypoglossal afferents. Experimental Neurology. 23: 291–301, 1969. [FMc]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boynton, R. M. Some temporal factors in vision. In: Rosenblith, W. A. (ed.), Sensory Communication. New York: Wiley, pp. 739–756, 1961. [MK, JL, DV]Google Scholar

Breitmeyer, B. G. and Ganz, L.Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review. 83: 1–36, 1976. [BB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bridgeman, B.Metacontrast and lateral inhibition. Psychological Review. 78: 528–39, 1976. [BB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distributed sensory coding applied to simulations of iconic storage and metacontrast. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 40:605–23, 1978. [BB]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broekhuijsen, J., Rashbass, C., and Veringa, F.The threshold of visual transients. Vision Research. 16: 1285–9, 1976. [GS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burgess, P. R. and Perl, E. R. Cutaneous mechanoreceptors and nociceptors. In: Iggo, A. (ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Volume II: Somatosensory System. New York, Springer, 1973. [MJ]Google Scholar

Cain, W. S.Spatial discrimination of cutaneous warmth. American Journal of Psychology. 86: 169–81, 1973. [LM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, R. A. and Lasky, E. Z.Adaptive threshold procedures: BUDTIF. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 44: 537–41, 1968. [HB]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, F. W. and Robson, J. G.Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. Journal of Physiology. 197: 551–66, 1968. [PL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chase, W. G. Elementary information processes. In: Estes, W. K. (ed.), Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes. Vol. 5. Human Information Processing. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum Associates. Pp. 19–90, 1978. [SS]Google Scholar

Cobb, P. W.Some comments on the Ives theory of flicker. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 24: 91–98, 1934. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, S. F.The effect of brightness in the range of attention experiments. American Journal of Psychology. 40: 254–74, 1928. [JT]Google Scholar

de Lange, H.Relationship between critical flicker frequency and a set of low frequency characteristics of the eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 44: 380–9, 1954. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donchin, E. Event-related brain potentials: A tool in the study of human information processing. In: Begleiter, H. (ed.), Evoked Potentials in Psychiatry. New York: Plenum Press, in press. [ED]Google Scholar

Donchin, E. and Isreal, J. B. Event-related potentials-Approaches to cognitive psychology. In: Snow, R. E., Federico, P. A., and Montague, W. W. (eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: Cognitive Process Analyses. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press. [ED]Google Scholar

Ritter, W., and McCallum, C. Cognitive psychophysiology: The endogenous components of the ERP. In: Callaway, E., Tueting, P., and Koslow, S. (eds.), Brain Event-related Potentials in Man. New York: Academic Press, 1978. [ED]Google Scholar

Eccles, J. C.The Neurophysiological Basis of Mind. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1953. [SL]Google Scholar

Efron, R.The duration of the present. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 138: 713–29, 1967. [GW]Google Scholar

Ekman, G. A note on generalized psychophysical laws. Reports from the Psy-chophysical Laboratories, University of Stockholm, No. 32, 1956. [RMW]Google Scholar

Enroth, Christina. The mechanism of flicker and fusion studied on single retinal elements in the dark-adapted eye of the cat. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 27:Suppl. 100, 1952. [RAW]Google ScholarPubMed

Fodor, J. A.The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell, 1975 [ZP]Google Scholar

Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, forthcoming. [ZP]Google Scholar

French, A. S. and Järvilehto, M.The dynamic behavior of photoreceptor cells in the fly in response to random (white noise) stimulation at a range of temperatures. Journal of Physiology. 274: 311–22, 1978. [PL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frumkes, T. E. and Miller, R. F.Pathways and polarities of synaptic interaction in the inner retina of the mudpuppy: II. Insight revealed by an analysis of latency and threshold. Brain Research. 161: 13–24, 1979. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frumkes, T. E., Nygaard, R. W., Licht, J. L., and Bauer, G.Temporal reciprocity within the long-wavelength cones of the frog, Rana pipiens. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 65: 1205–6, 1975. [TF]Google Scholar

Fuortes, M. G. F. and Hodgkin, A. L.Changes in time scale and sensitivity in the ommatidia of limulus. Journal of Physiology. 172: 239–63, 1964. [SY]Google Scholar

Fuortes, M. G. F. and Poggio, G. F.Transient responses to sudden illumination in cells of the eye of Limulus. Journal of General Physiology. 46: 435–52, 1963. [RAW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garner, W. R.The effect of frequency spectrum on temporal integration of energy in the ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 19: 808–15, 1947. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gersuni, G. V., Baru, A. V., Karaseva, T. A., and Tonkonogii, I. M. Effects of temporal lobe lesions on perception of sounds of short duration. In Gersuni, G. V. (ed. ), Sensory Processes at the Neuronal and Behavioral Levels. New York: Academic Press, 1971. [HB]Google Scholar

Graham, C. H. (ed.). Vision and Visual Perception. New York: Wiley, 1965. [RMW]Google Scholar

Graham, C. H. and Kemp, E. H.Brightness discrimination as a function of the duration of the increment in intensity. Journal of General Physiology. 21: 635–50, 1938. [GS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gray, J. A. B. and Sato, M.Properties of the receptor potential in pacinian corpuscles. Journal of Physiology. 122: 610–36, 1953. [MJ]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Green, D. M.Auditory detection of a noise signal. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 32: 121–31, 1960. [DR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, D. M. and Luce, R. D. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in auditory detection. In Korn-blum, S. (ed.), Attention and Performance IV. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 547–69, 1973. [BW]Google Scholar

Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A.Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966. [DR]Google Scholar

Grossberg, M.Failure of Bloch's law for simple reaction time. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 4: 147–9, 1974. [MK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haber, R. N. and Standing, L. G.Direct estimates of the apparent duration of a flash. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 24: 216–29, 1970. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, S.What's So Funny about Science? Los Altos, Calif.: William Kaufman, 1977. [ED]Google Scholar

Hartline, H. K.Visual receptors and retinal interaction. Science. 164: 270–78, 1969. [SL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haugeland, J.The nature and plausibility of cognitivism. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1: 215–60, 1978. [ZP]Google Scholar

Hefferline, R. F.The role of proprioception in the control of behavior. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. 20: 739–764, 1958. [FMc]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hirsh, I. J. Temporal aspects of hearing. In: Tower, D. B. (ed.), The Nervous System. Vol. 3. Human Communication and Its Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1975. [LF]Google Scholar

Ikeda, M. and Boynton, R. M.Effect of test-flash duration upon the spectral sensitivity of the eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 52: 697–9, 1962. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ives, H. E.CFF relations in scotopic vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 6: 254–68, 1922a. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A theory of intermittent vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 6:343–61, 1922b. [GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jankowska, E. and Smith, D. O.Antidromic activation of Renshaw cells and their axonal projections. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 88: 198–214, 1973. [DV]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johansson, G. G.Electrical stimulation of a human ventrolateral-subventrolat-eral thalamic target area, II. Combination of different durations of single pulses with the peak current just adequate to evoke clinical responses. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. 72: 446–55, 1969. [DV]Google Scholar

Johnson, K. O., Darian-Smith, I., and LaMotte, C.Peripheral neural determinants of temperature discrimination in man: a correlative study. Journal of Neurophysiology. 36: 347–70, 1973. [SL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D.Time-intensity reciprocity under various conditions of adaptation and backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 71: 543–549, 1966. [DK, GW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahneman, D.Time-intensity reciprocity in acuity as a function of luminance and figure-ground contrast. Vision Research. 6: 207–15, 1966. [DK, GW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Norman, J., and Kubovy, M.Critical duration for the resolution of form: centrally or peripherally determined? Journal of Experimental Psychology. 73: 323–27, 1967. [DK]Google Scholar

Katz, M. S. The perceived brightness of light flashes. Doctoral Dissertation. Univ. Rochester, 1959. [JL]Google Scholar

Brief flash brightness. Vision Research. 4:361–73, 1964. [MK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kietzman, M. L., Shapiro, E., and Bienstock, B. “Visual temporal integration and simple reaction time (RT) for equal-energy stimuli of different luminances.” Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, April, 1975. [MK]Google Scholar

Kietzman, M. L. and Sutton, S.The interpretation of two-pulse measures of temporal resolution in vision. Vision Research. 8: 287–302, 1968. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kirsner, K.Naming latency facilitation: An analysis of the encoding component in recognition reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 95: 171–76, 1972. [AR]Google Scholar

Krantz, D. H. and Tversky, A.Conjoint-measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology. Psychological Review. 78: 151–69, 1971. [GS]Google Scholar

Kruskal, J. B.Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 827: 251–63, 1965. [GS]Google Scholar

Kuffler, S. W.Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. Journal of Neurophysiology. 16: 37–68, 1953. [GW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2nd Edn.), 1970. [GW]Google Scholar

Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., and Donchin, E.Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science. 197: 792–95, 1977. [ED]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Laughlin, S. B. and Hardie, R.Common strategies for light adaptation in the peripheral visual systems of fly and dragonfly. Journal of Comparative Physiology. 128: 319–40, 1978. [SL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebowitz, H. W., Myers, N. A., and Grant, D. A.Radial localization of a single stimulus as a function of luminance and duration of exposure. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 45: 76–78, 1955. [LM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levick, W. R. Receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells. In: Fuortes, M. G. F. (ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Volume VII/2: Physiology of Photoreceptor Organs. New York: Springer, 1972. [MJ]Google Scholar

Maintained discharge in the visual system and its role for information processing. In: Autrum, H., Jung, R., Loewenstein, W. R., McKay, D. M., and Teuber, H. L. (eds.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. VII/3A. Central Processing of Visual Information. pp. 575–98. Berlin, Heidelberg, and New York: Springer, 1973a. [WL]Google Scholar

Variation in the response latency of cat retinal ganglion cells. Vision Research. 13:837–53, 1973b. [WL]Google Scholar

Levick, W. R. and Zacks, J. L.Responses of cat retinal ganglion cells to brief flashes of light. Journal of Physiology. 206: 677–700, 1970. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Libet, B. Electrical stimulation of cortex in human subjects and conscious sensory aspects. In: Iggo, A. (ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. II, Chapter 19, Somatosensory system. pp. 743–90. Heidelberg: Springer- Ver-lag, 1973. [BL]Google Scholar

Neuronal vs. subjective timing, for a conscious sensory experience. In: Buser, P. and Rouguel-Buser, A. (eds.), Cerebral Correlates of Conscious Experience, Inserm Symposium No. 6. pp. 69–82. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1978. [BL]Google Scholar

Alberts, W. W., Wright, E. W., Delattre, L. D., Levin, G., and Feinstein, B.Production of threshold levels of conscious sensation by electrical stimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 27: 546–78, 1964. [BL]Google Scholar

Alberts, W. W., Wright, E. W. Jr, and Feinstein, B.Responses of human somatosensory cortex to stimuli below threshold for conscious sensation. Science. 158: 1,597–1,600, 1967. [DV]Google Scholar

Cortical and thalamic activation in conscious sensory experience. In: Somjen, G. G. (ed.), Neurophysiology Studied in Man. pp. 157–68, Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica, 1972. [BL]Google Scholar

Wright, E. W. Jr, Feinstein, B., and Pearl, D. K.Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience: a functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain. 102: 191–222, 1979. [BL]Google Scholar

Lindsay, P. H. and Norman, D. A.Short-term retention during a simultaneous detection task. Perception and Psychophysics. 5: 201–5, 1969. [ED]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Link, S. W.The relative judgment theory of two-choice reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 12: 114–36, 1975. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The relative judgment theory analysis of response time deadline experiments. In Castellan, N. J. and Restle, F. (eds.), Cognitive Theory. Vol. 3. Hillsdale, N. J.: LEA, 1978. [AR]Google Scholar

Long, G. E.The effect of duration of onset and cessation of light flash on the intensity-time relation in the peripheral retina. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 41: 743–47, 1951. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lorinstein, I. B. and Haber, R. N.Perceived numerosity: An information processing analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychology. 29: 224–36, 1975. [RH]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lupp, U., Hauske, G., and Wolf, W.Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research. 16: 969–72, 1976. [AP]Google Scholar

Mansfield, R. J. W.Brightness function: Effect of area and duration. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 63: 913–20, 1973b. [RM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Visual adaptation: Retinal transduction, brightness and sensitivity. Vision Research. 16:679–90, 1976a. [RM]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Psychophysics and the neural basis of information processing. In: Geissler, H. G. and Zabrodin, Y. M. (eds.), Advances in Psychophysics. pp. 349–76, Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1976b. [RM]Google Scholar

Mansfield, R. J. W. and Daugman, J. D.Retinal mechanisms of visual latency. Vision Research. 18: 1,247–60, 1978. [RM]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marks, L. E.Sensory Processes: The New Psychophysics. New York: Academic Press, 1974. [DV]Google Scholar

McCarthy, G. and Donchin, E. Event-related brain potentials-Manifestations of cognitive activity. Prepared for the Bayer VII Symposium on the Evaluation of Old Age Related Changes and Disorders of Brain Function. Grosse Ledder, West Germany, October 1978, in press. [ED]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, G., Kutas, M., and Donchin, E. Detecting errors with P300 latency. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting, Society for Psychophysiological Research. Psychophysiology, in press. [ED]Google Scholar

McDougall, W.The variation of the intensity of visual sensation with the duration of the stimulus. Rritish Journal of Psychology. 1: 151–89, 1904. [DK]Google Scholar

McGuigan, F. J.Cognitive Psychophysiology: Principles of Covert Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978. [FMc]Google Scholar

McGuigan, F. J. and Pavek, G. V.On the psychophysiological identification of covert nonoral language processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 92: 237–45, 1972. [FMc]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mihailovic, L. and Delgado, J. M. R.Electrical stimulation of monkey brain with various frequencies and pulse durations. Journal of Neurophysiology. 19: 21–36, 1956. [DV]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, J. M. and Glickstein, M.Neural circuits involved in visuomotor reaction time in monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 30: 399–414, 1967. [SS]Google Scholar

Miller, J. O. and Pachella, R. G.Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 101: 227–31, 1973. [SS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, R. F. and Dacheux, R. F.Synaptic organization and ionic basis of on and off channels in mudpuppy retina. III. A model of ganglion cell receptive field organization based on Chloride-free experiments. Journal of General Physiology. 67: 679–90, 1976. [TF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, D. E. Effects of early visual experience on the development of certain perceptual abilities in animals and man. In: Walk, R. E. and Pick, H. L. Jr (eds.), Perception and Experience. New York: Plenum Press, 1978. [RH]Google Scholar

Mollon, J. D. and Krauskopf, J.Reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of individual colour mechanisms. Vision Research. 13: 27–40, 1973. [TU]Google Scholar

Moore, B. C. J.Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1977. [GW]Google Scholar

Mountcastle, V. B. An organizing principle for cerebral function: The unit module and the distributed system. In: Edelman, E. M. and Mountcastle, V. B., The Mindful Brain. pp. 7–51. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1978. [RM]Google Scholar

Mueller, C. G.Quantum concepts in visual intensity-discrimination. American Journal of Psychology. 63: 92–100, 1950. [DR, GW]Google Scholar

Murray, H. G.Stimulus intensity and reaction time: Evaluation of a decision-theory model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 84: 383–91, 1970. [SS]Google Scholar

Nagel, T.What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review. 83: 435–50, 1974. [BL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Naka, K.-I.Functional organization of catfish retina. Journal of Neurophysiology. 40: 26–43, 1977. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Naka, K.-I. and Rushton, W. A. H.The generation and spread of S-potentials in fish (Cyprinidae). Journal of Physiology. 192: 437–61, 1967. [TF]Google Scholar

Nichol, G. D. and Miller, W. H.Cyclic GMP injected into retinal rod outer segments increases latency and amplitude of response to illumination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 75: 5,217–20, 1978. [RM]Google Scholar

Nissen, M. J.Stimulus intensity and information processing. Perception and Psychophysics. 22: 338–52, 1977. [MP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, M. F. and Gallistel, C. R.What can one learn from a strength-duration experiment? Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 18: 1–24, 1978. [GS, GW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olds, J., Disterhoft, J. F., Segal, M., Kornblith, C. L., and Hirsh, R.Learning centers of rat brain mapped by measuring latencies of conditioned unit responses. Journal of Neurophysiology. 35: 202–19, 1972. [MP]Google Scholar

Penner, M. J.A power law transformation resulting in a class of short-term integrators that produce time-intensity trades for noise bursts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 63: 195–201, 1978. [HB]Google Scholar

Pieron, H.Psychologie expérimentale. Paris: Collins, 1939. [AP]Google Scholar

The Sensations: Their Functions, Processes, and Mechanisms. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1952. [MK]Google Scholar

Plomp, R. and Bouman, M. A.Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 31: 749–58, 1959. [LF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, M. I.Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1978. [MP, GW]Google Scholar

Prestrude, A. M.Visual latencies at photopic levels of retinal illuminance. Vision Research. 11: 351–61, 1971. [SS]Google Scholar

Pritchard, E. A. B.Cutaneous tactile localization. Brain. 54: 350–71, 1931. [LM]Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. W. Imagery and artificial intelligence. In Savage, W. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 9. Minneapolis, Univ. Minn. Press, 1978. [ZP]Google Scholar

Explanatory adequacy of cognitive process models. In preparation, 1978. [ZP]Google Scholar

Raab, D. H.Backward masking. Psychological Bulletin. 60: 118–29, 1963. [AP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Raab, D., Fehrer, E., and Hershenson, M.Visual reaction time and the Broca-Sulzer phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 61: 193–99, 1961. [SS]Google Scholar

Ranck, J. B. JrWhich elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Research. 98: 417–40, 1975. [DV]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rashbass, C.The visibility of transient changes of luminance. Journal of Physiology. 210: 165–86, 1970. [GS]Google Scholar

Ratcliff, R.A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review. 85: 59–108, 1978. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reed, A. V. Signal integration models of speed-accuracy tradeoff in recognition memory. Paper presented at the Mathematical Psychology Meeting, Montreal, 1973a. [AR]Google Scholar

Speed-accuracy tradeoff in recognition memory. Science. 181:574–76, 1973b. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

List length and the time-course of recognition in immediate memory. Memory and Cognition. 4:6–13, 1976. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Regan, D.Evoked Potentials. New York: Wiley, 1972. [MP]Google Scholar

Ripps, H. and Weale, R. A.Cone pigments in the normal human fovea. Vision Research. 3: 531–43, 1963. [RAW]Google Scholar

Rodieck, R. W.The Vertebrate Retina, Principles of Structure and Function. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1973. [SL]Google Scholar

Rosner, B. S. and Goff, W. R. Electrical responses of the nervous system and subjective scales of intensity. In Neff, W. D. (ed.), Contributions to Sensory Physiology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1967. [RMW]Google Scholar

Roufs, J. A. J.Perception lag as a function of stimulus luminance. Vision Research. 3: 81–91, 1963. [SS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rutschmann, R. Perception of temporal order of electrocutaneous stimuli and simple reaction time. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, Mass., April 1967. [SS]Google Scholar

Saltzman, I. J. and Garner, W. R.Reaction time as a measure of span of attention. Journal of Psychology. 25: 227–41, 1948. [JT]Google Scholar

Sanders, A. F.The foreperiod effect revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 27: 591–98, 1975. [MP]Google Scholar

Sanford, A. J.Effects of changes in the intensity of white noise on simultaneity judgments and simple reaction time. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 23: 296–303, 1971. [SS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwartz, R. J. and Friedland, B.Linear Systems. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1965. [GS]Google Scholar

Shepard, R. N. and Metzler, J.Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science. 171: 701–703, 1971. [ED]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shevelev, I. A. and Hicks, L. H. Characteristics of temporal summation at different levels in the visual system of the cat. In: Gersuni, G. V. (ed.), Sensory Processes at the Neuronal and Behavioral Levels. New York: Academic Press, 1971. [TU]Google Scholar

Sperling, G.The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs. 74:(whole No. 498), 1960. [AP]Google Scholar

Linear theory and the psychophysics of flicker. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 18:3–15, 1964. [GS]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Model of visual adaptation and contrast detection. Perception and Psychophysics. 8:143–157, 1970. [JL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stebbins, W. C.Auditory reaction time and the derivation of equal loudness contours for the monkey. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 9: 135–42, 1966. [SS]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sternberg, R. J.Intelligence, Information Processing, and Analogical Reasoning: The Componential Analysis of Human Abilities. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Press, 1977. [RS]Google Scholar

The nature of mental abilities. American Psychologist, in press 1979. (a) [RS]Google Scholar

Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, in press. 1979 (b) [RS]Google Scholar

Sternberg, S.Two operations in character recognition. Perception and Psychophysics. 2: 45–53, 1967. [SS]Google Scholar

Sternberg, S. and Knoll, R. L. The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. In: Kornblum, S. (ed.), Attention and Performance IV. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 629–85, 1973. [SS]Google Scholar

Stevens, J. C. A comparison of ratio scales for the loudness of white noise and the brightness of white light. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1957. [RMW]Google Scholar

Stevens, J. C. and Hall, J. W.Brightness and loudness as functions of stimulus duration. Perception and Psychophysics. 1: 319–27, 1966. [RM]Google Scholar

Stevens, S. S. Mathematics, measurement, and psychophysics. In Stevens, S. S. (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. [LM]Google Scholar

Tayal, O. P.Absolute and difference limen in visual perception as a function of the duration of stimulus pulse. Perception & Psychophysics. 24: 40–48, 1978Google Scholar

Taylor, M. M., Lindsay, P. H., and Forbes, S. M.Quantification of shared capacity processing in auditory and visual discrimination. Acta Psychologica. 27: 223–29, 1967. [AR]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tolhurst, D. J.Reaction times in the detection of gratings by human observers: A probabilistic Mechanism. Vision Research. 15: 1, 143–55, 1975. [JK, GW]Google Scholar

Townsend, J. T. and Roos, R. N.Search reaction time for single targets in multiletter stimuli with brief visual displays. Memory and Cognition. 1: 319–32, 1973. [JT]Google Scholar

Treisman, A. M. Selective attention and stimulus integration. Talk presented to the American Psychological Association, August 1978. [MP]Google Scholar

Ueno, T.Luminance-duration relation in reaction time to spectral stimuli. Vision Research. 16: 721–25, 1976. [TU]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Reaction time as a measure of temporal summation at suprathreshold levels. Vision Research. 17:227–32, 1977. [TU]Google Scholar

Uttal, W. R.The psychobiological silly season-or-What happens when neurophysiological data become psychological theories. Journal of General Psychology. 84: 151–66, 1971. [AB]Google Scholar

Vaughan, H. G. The perceptual and physiologic significance of visual evoked responses recorded from the scalp in man. In: Burian, H. M. and Jacobson, J. H., Clinical Electroretinography. pp. 203–20. New York: Pergamon Press, 1966. [RM]Google Scholar

Costa, L. D., and Gilden, L.The functional relation of visual evoked response and reaction time to stimulus intensity. Vision Research. 6: 645–56, 1966. [SS]Google Scholar

Victor, J. D. and Knight, B. W. Nonlinear analysis with an arbitrary stimulus ensemble. The Quarterly of Applied Mathematics. In Press, 1979. [GS]Google Scholar

Voltera, V.Theory of functionals and intergo-differential equations. New York: Dover, 1959. [SY]Google Scholar

Wandell, B. A.Speed-accuracy tradeoff in visual detection: Applications of neural counting and timing. Vision Research. 17: 217–25, 1977. [BW]Google Scholar

Warren, R. M.Visual intensity judgments: an empirical rule and a theory. Psychological Review. 76: 16–30, 1969. [RMW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Warren, R. M. and Warren, R. P.Basis for judgments of relative brightness. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 48: 445–50, 1958. [RMW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wasserman, G. S.Color Vision: An historical introduction. New York: Wiley, 1978 [GW]Google Scholar

Weale, R. A.Photo-chemical changes in the dark-adapting human retina. Vision Research. 2: 25–33, 1962 [RAW]Google Scholar

Vision and fundus reflectometry. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 19:252–86, 1965. [RAW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senile changes in visual acuity. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of the United Kingdom. 95:36–38, 1975. [RAW]Google Scholar

The eye and aging. Interdisciplinary Topics in Gerontology. 13:1–13, 1978. [RAW]Google Scholar

Wells, G. R.The influence of stimulus duration on reaction time. Psychological Monographs. 15:(whole No. 66), 1913. [AP]Google Scholar

Werblin, F. S.Regenerative amacrine cell depolarization and formation of on-off ganglion cell responses. Journal of Physiology. 264: 767–85, 1977. [TF]Google Scholar

Werblin, F. S. and Copenhagen, D. R.Control of retinal sensitivity - III. Lateral interactions at the inner plexiform layer. Journal of General Physiology. 63: 88–110, 1974. [TF]Google Scholar

Werblin, F. S. and Dowling, J. E.Organization of retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. Journal of Neurophysiology. 32: 339–55, 1969. [TF]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wickelgren, W. A.Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica. 41: 67–85, 1977. [MP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiener, N.Cybernetics. New York: John Wiley, 1948. [FMc]Google Scholar

Witkovsky, P., Nelson, J., and Ripps, H.Action spectra and adaptation properties of carp photoreceptors. Journal of General Physiology. 61: 401–23, 1973. [TF]Google Scholar

Yeandle, S.Some properties of the components of the limulus ommatidiel potential. Kybernetik. 3: 250–54, 1967. [SY]Google Scholar

Zacks, J. L.Temporal summation phenomena at threshold: Their relation to visual mechanisms. Science. 170: 197–9, 1970. [TF]Google Scholar

Zwislocki, J. J.Theory of temporal auditory summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 32: 1046–60, 1960. [LF, GW]Google Scholar

Temporal summation of loudness: An analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 46:431–41, 1969. [HB, LF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar