Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:14:04.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissociating body image and body schema with rubber hands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2007

Nicholas Paul Holmes  and
Charles Spence
Nicholas Paul Holmes
Affiliation:
Espace et Action, INSERM Unité 864, Bron 69676, [email protected]://www.neurobiography.info
Charles Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.psy.ox.ac/xmodal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dijkerman & de Haan (D&dH) argue that body image and body schema form parts of different and dissociable somatosensory streams. We agree in general, but believe that more emphasis should be placed on interactions between these two streams. We illustrate this point with evidence from the rubber-hand illusion (RHI) – an illusion of body image, which depends critically upon body schema.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 211 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armel, K. C. & Ramachandran, V. S. (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 270:1499–506.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M. & Cohen, J. (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391:756.Google Scholar
Ehrsson, H. H., Holmes, N. P. & Passingham, R. E. (2005a) Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. Journal of Neuroscience 25(45):10564–73.Google Scholar
Ehrsson, H. H., Spence, C. & Passingham, R. E. (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305(5685):875–77.Google Scholar
Head, H. & Holmes, G. (1911–1912) Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34:102–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, N. P., Snijders, H. J. & Spence, C. (2006) Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception and Psychophysics 68:685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, N. P. & Spence, C. (2005) Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: Spatial and temporal factors. Experimental Brain Research 166:489–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ijsselsteijn, W. A., de Kort, Y. A. W. & Haan, A. (2006) Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15: 455–464.Google Scholar
Schaefer, M., Flor, H., Heinze, H.-J. & Rotte, M. (2006a) Dynamic modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex during seeing and feeling a touched hand. NeuroImage 29:587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaefer, M., Noennig, N., Heinze, H.-J. & Rotte, M. (2006b) Fooling your feelings: Artificially induced referred sensations are linked to a modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex. NeuroImage 29:67–73.Google Scholar
Tastevin, J. (1937) En partant de l'experience d'Aristote: Les déplacements artificiels des parties du corps ne sont pas suivis par le sentiment de ces parties ni pas les sensations qu'on peut y produire. [Starting from Aristotle's experiment: The artificial displacements of parts of the body are not followed by feeling in these parts or by the sensations which can be produced there]. L'Encephale 1:57–84.Google Scholar
Tsakiris, M. & Haggard, P. (2005) The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31:80–91.Google Scholar
Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G. & Haggard, P. (2006) Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Consciousness and Cognition 15(2):423–32.Google Scholar