No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Disgust as a mechanism for externalization: Coordination and disassociation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 May 2018
Abstract
I extend Stanford's proposal in two ways by focusing on a possible mechanism of externalization: disgust. First, I argue that externalization also has value for solving coordination problems where interests of different groups coincide. Second, Stanford's proposal also holds promise for explaining why people “over-comply” with norms through disassociation, or the avoidance of actions that merely appear to violate norms.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018
References
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M. & Anderson, A. K. (2009) In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science 323(5918):1222–26.Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R. & Chapman, H. A. (2017) Beyond purity: Moral disgust toward bad character. Psychological Science 28(1):80–91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616673193.Google Scholar
McElreath, R., Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2003) Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology 44(1):122–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/345689.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. & Fallon, A. E. (1987) A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review 94(1):23–41.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. & Haidt, J. (2013) The domains of disgust and their origins: Contrasting biological and cultural evolutionary accounts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(8):367–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
The difference between ice cream and Nazis: Moral externalization and the evolution of human cooperation
Related commentaries (23)
A cognitive, non-selectionist account of moral externalism
Coordination, conflict, and externalization
Disgust as a mechanism for externalization: Coordination and disassociation
Do the folk need a meta-ethics?
Do we really externalize or objectivize moral demands?
Externalization is common to all value judgments, and norms are motivating because of their intersubjective grounding
Externalization of moral demands does not motivate exclusion of non-cooperators: A defense of a subjectivist moral psychology
From objectivized morality to objective morality
Generalization and the experience of obligations as externally imposed: Distinct contributors to the evolution of human cooperation
Green beards and signaling: Why morality is not indispensable
How does moral objectification lead to correlated interactions?
Is all morality or just prosociality externalized?
Moral cues from ordinary behaviour
Moral demands truly are externally imposed
Moral externalisation fails to scale
Moral externalization is an implausible mechanism for cooperation, let alone “hypercooperation”
Moral externalization may precede, not follow, subjective preferences
Moralization of preferences and conventions and the dynamics of tribal formation
Norms, not moral norms: The boundaries of morality do not matter
Not as distinct as you think: Reasons to doubt that morality comprises a unified and objective conceptual category
The brighter the light, the deeper the shadow: Morality also fuels aggression, conflict, and violence
The difference between the scope of a norm and its apparent source
The objectivity of moral norms is a top-down cultural construct
Author response
Moral externalization and normativity: The errors of our ways