Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:50:46.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decontextualised data IN, decontextualised theory OUT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1999

Benjamin Roberts ,
Mike Kalish ,
Kathryn Hird  and
Kim Kirsner
Benjamin Roberts
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Western Australia, Perth 6907, Australiabenjamin,kalish,[email protected] www.psy.uwa.edu.au
Mike Kalish
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Western Australia, Perth 6907, Australiabenjamin,kalish,[email protected] www.psy.uwa.edu.au
Kathryn Hird
Affiliation:
School of Speech and Hearing Science, Curtin University of Technology, Perth 6845, [email protected] www.curtin.edu.au/curtin/dept/shs
Kim Kirsner
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Western Australia, Perth 6907, Australiabenjamin,kalish,[email protected] www.psy.uwa.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss our concerns associated with three assumptions upon which the model of Levelt, Roelofs & Meyer is based: assumed generalisability of decontextualised experimental programs, assumed highly modular architecture of the language production systems, and assumed symbolic computations within the language production system. We suggest that these assumptions are problematic and require further justification.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 1999 , pp. 54 - 55
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)