Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-23T00:50:34.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The creativity of architects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Michael A. Arbib Open the ORCID record for Michael A. Arbib [Opens in a new window]
Michael A. Arbib*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, UCSD, La Jolla, CA, USA [email protected]
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

TA builds on the state of mind (SoM) framework to offer the novelty-seeking model (NSM). The model relates curiosity to creativity but this commentary focuses on creativity: (i) It assesses the SoM + NSM model of creativity-in-the-lab, showing that the focus on semantic networks is inadequate. (ii) It discusses architectural design to sketch ideas for a theory of “big C” creativity.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e91
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arbib, M. A. (2020). From spatial navigation via visual construction to episodic memory and imagination. Biological Cybernetics, 114, 139–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbib, M. A. (2021). When brains meet buildings: A conversation between neuroscience and architecture. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M. A., & Bonaiuto, J. J. (2012). Multiple levels of spatial organization: World graphs and spatial difference learning. Adaptive Behavior, 4, 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, A. R., & Riseman, E. M. (1978). VISIONS: A computer system for interpreting scenes. In Hanson, A. R. & Riseman, E. M. (Eds.), Computer vision systems (pp. 129–163). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Lieblich, I., & Arbib, M. A. (1982). Multiple representations of space underlying behavior. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 627–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1964). Arthur Koestler's view of the creative process. Scientific American, 211(5), 145–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovitch, M., Cabeza, R., Winocur, G., & Nadel, L. (2016). Episodic memory and beyond: The hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2020). Memory and imagination: Perspectives on constructive episodic simulation. In Abraham, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 111–131). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerfield, J. J., Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2010). Differential engagement of brain regions within a “core” network during scene construction. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1501–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar