Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:31:02.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cooperation, cognition and communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Glendon Schubert
Glendon Schubert
Affiliation:
Nederlands Instituut voor Voortgezet Wetenschappelijk Ondersoek op het Gebied van de Mens- en Maatschappijwetenschappen, Mayboomlaan 1, Wassenaar 2242PR, Holland; and University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 4: A Special Issue on Cognition and Consiousness in Nonhuman Species , December 1978 , pp. 597 - 600
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Argyle, M.Bodily communication. London: Methuen, 1975.Google Scholar
Baerends, G. An evaluation of the conflict hypothesis as an explanatory principle for the evolution of displays. In Baerands, G., Beer, C., and Manning, A. (eds.), Function and evolution in behaviour: Essays in honour of Professor Niko Tinbergen. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Baerends, G. On drive, conflict and instinct, and the functional organization of behavior. In Corner, M. A., and Swaab, D. F. (eds.), Perspectives in brain research: Progress in brain research, vol. 45. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1976a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baerends, G.The functional organization of behaviour. Animal Behaviour 24:726–738, 1976b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, K.Attitudes toward history, vol. 2. New York: New Republic Press, 1937.Google Scholar
Chapple, E. D.Culture and biological man: Explorations in behavioral anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.Google Scholar
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. A Piagetian model for describing and comparing socialization in monkey, ape, and human infants. In Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S., and Poirier, F. E. (eds.), Primate bio-social development. New York: Garland, 1977.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. Brain structure and intelligence in macaques and human infants from a Piagetian perspective. In Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S., and Poirier, F. E. (eds.), Primate bio-social development. New York: Garland, 1977.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L. and Sharp, H. S. (eds.) Wolf and man: Evolution in parallel. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Harrington, F. H., and Mech., L. D. Wolf vocalization. In Hall, R. L., and Sharp, H. S. (eds.), Wolf and man: Evolution in parallel. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (ed.) Non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Itani, J., and Nishimura, A. The study of infra-human culture in Japan: A review. In Menzel, E. W. (ed.), Precultural primate behavior. Basel S. Karger, 1973.Google Scholar
Key, M. R. (ed.) The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication. The Hague: Mouton, 1979.Google Scholar
Lancaster, J. B.Primate behavior and the emergence of human culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975.Google Scholar
MacLean, P. D.The limbic system with respect to self-preservation and preservation preservation of the species. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 127(1):1–11, 1958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainardi, D. Tradition and the social transmission of behavior in animals. In Barlow, G. W., and Silverberg, J. (eds.), Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture. A.A.A.S. Special Symposium 35. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W., Implications of chimpanzee language-training experiments for primate field research - and vice versa. In Chivers, D. J. and Herbert, J. (eds.), Recent advances in primatology. 1. Behaviour. London: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Morris, D.Manwatching: A field guide to human behaviour. London: Jonathan Cape, 1977.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, J. E.The emergence of society. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1977.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., and Rumbaugh, D. M. Communication, language, and LANA: A perspective. In Rumbaugh, D. M. (ed.), Language learning by a chimpanzee: The LANA project, New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Schubert, G.The judicial mind: The attitudes and ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern Univ. Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Schubert, G.The judicial mind revisited. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Schubert, G. Nonverbal communication as political behavior. In Key, M. R., and Preziosi, D. (eds.), Nonverbal communication today: Current research, in press.Google Scholar
von Cranach, M. et al. (eds.) Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, in press.Google Scholar
von Glasersfeld, E. Linguistic communication: theory and definition. In Rumbaugh, D. M., (ed.), Language learning by a chimpanzee: The LANA project. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Weiss, G.A scientific concept of culture. American Anthropologist 75:1376–1413 (esp. p. 1395), 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegele, T. C. Physiologically-based content analysis: An application in political communication. In Ruben, B. D. (ed.), Communication yearbook 2. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books. 1978.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O.Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1975.Google Scholar