Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:01:40.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concept talk cannot be avoided

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2010

James A. Hampton
James A. Hampton
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, City University London, London, EC1V OHB, United Kingdom. [email protected]/hampton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Distinct systems for representing concepts as prototypes, exemplars, and theories are closely integrated in the mind, and the notion of concept is required as a framework for exploring this integration. Eliminating the term “concept” from our theories will hinder rather than promote scientific progress.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 212 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsalou, L. W. & Hale, C. R. (1993) Components of conceptual representation: From feature lists to recursive frames. In: Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis, ed. van Mechelen, I., Hampton, J. A., Michalski, R. S. & Theuns, P., pp. 97–144. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. A. (1998) Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories. Cognition 65:137–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. (2009) Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982) The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (2002) The big book of concepts. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D. & Minda, J. P. (1998) Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24:1411–36.Google Scholar
Storms, G., De Boeck, P. & Ruts, W. (2000) Prototype and exemplar based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory and Language 42:51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar