Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-vj8bv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T05:17:01.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary on creativity and curiosity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Mark A. Runco Open the ORCID record for Mark A. Runco [Opens in a new window]
Mark A. Runco*
Affiliation:
Southern Oregon University Director, Creativity Research & Programming, Ashland, OR, USA [email protected]; www.markrunco.com
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article covers a large amount of ground and offers a provocative perspective. This commentary focuses on (a) assumptions, namely that there are discrete stages in the creative process and that novelty and usefulness are inextricable, (b) hidden variables in the creativity–curiosity relationship, and (c) the difference between an explanation of creativity versus a description of influence on it.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e113
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 61–91). Sage.Google Scholar
Berg, M. (2014). Commerce and creativity in eighteenth-century Birmingham. In Markets and manufacture in early industrial Europe (pp. 173–201). Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jesus, S. N., Rus, S. L., Lens, W., & Imaginário, S. (2013) Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 80–84, doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.752235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litchfield, R. C. (2008). Brainstorming reconsidered: A goal-based view. Academy of Management Review, 33, 649–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. (Ed.). (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickards, T., & deCock, C. (2003). Understanding organizational creativity: Towards a multi-paradigmatic approach. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1–31). Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1994). Conclusions concerning problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 272–290). Ablex.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2010). Creative thinking may be simultaneous as well as blind. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 184–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runco, M. A. (2019). Creativity as a dynamic, personal, parsimonious process. In Beghetto, R. & Corazza, G. (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity (pp. 181–188). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2023). AI can only produce artificial creativity. Journal of Creativity, 33, 100063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, R., Miranda, B., & Koyejo, S. (2023). Are emergent abilities of large language models a mirage? arXiv:2304.15004v2 [cs.AI] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.15004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2023). The blind-variation and selective-retention theory of creativity: Recent developments and current status of BVSR. Creativity Research Journal, 35, 304–323. doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2059919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Harcourt Brace & World.Google Scholar