No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“Big data” needs an analysis of decision processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2014
Abstract
We demonstrate by means of a simulation that the conceptual map presented by Bentley et al. is incomplete without taking into account people's decision processes. Within the same environment, two decision processes can generate strikingly different collective behavior; in two environments that fundamentally differ in transparency, a single process gives rise to virtually identical behavior.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review
103:650–69.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, J. R. & Wernerfelt, B. (1990) An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research
16:393–408.Google Scholar
Moussaïd, M., Kämmer, J. E., Analytis, P. & Neth, H. (2013) Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PLoS ONE
8(11).Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review
63:129–38.Google Scholar
Target article
“Big data” needs an analysis of decision processes
Related commentaries (1)
Mapping collective behavior in the big-data era