Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:05:29.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attachment theory underestimates the child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Judith Rich Harris
Affiliation:
54 Crawford Road, Middletown, NJ 07748. [email protected]://xchar.home.att.net/tna/

Abstract

The problem with elaborations of attachment theory is attachment theory itself. How would a mind that works the way the theory posits have increased its owner's fitness in hunter-gatherer times? The child's mind is more capacious and discerning than attachment theorists give it credit for. Early-appearing, long-lasting personality characteristics, often mistaken for the lingering effects of early experiences, are more likely due to genetic influences on personality.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Caspi, A. & Roberts, B. W. (2001) Personality development across the life course: The argument for change and continuity. Psychological Inquiry 12:4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cesario, S. K. & Hughes, L. A. (2007) Precocious puberty: A comprehensive review of literature. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 36:263–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., Duncan, T. E., Eddy, J. M., Fagot, B. I. & Fetrow, R. (1994) The world of parents and peers: Coercive exchanges and children's social adaptation. Social Development 3:255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doligez, B., Danchin, E. & Clobert, J. (2002) Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population. Science 297:1168–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, R. E. (1988) Fatness and fertility. Scientific American 258(3):8895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, J. R. (1998) The nurture assumption. Free Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R. (2006) No two alike: Human nature and human individuality. Norton.Google Scholar
Mendle, J., Turkheimer, E., D'Onofrio, B. M., Lynch, S. K., Emery, R. E., Slutske, W. S. & Martin, N. G. (2006) Family structure and age at menarche: a children-of-twins approach. Developmental Psychology 42:533–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (2006) The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist 61:622–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowe, D. C. (2000b) Evolutionary ecology embraces early experience. Evolution and Human Behavior 21:352–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudino, K. J. (1997) Moving beyond the heritability question: New directions in behavioral genetic studies of personality. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6:8690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrewsbury, V. & Wardle, J. (2008) Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: A systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990–2005. Obesity 16:275–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed