Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:05:07.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Attachment and life history strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Aurelio José Figueredo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0068. [email protected]@[email protected]/~ajf
Jon A. Sefcek
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0068. [email protected]@[email protected]/~ajf
Sally G. Olderbak
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0068. [email protected]@[email protected]/~ajf

Abstract

Del Giudice addresses a complex and pertinent theoretical issue: the evolutionary adaptiveness of sex differences in attachment styles in relation to life history strategy. Although we applaud Del Giudice for calling attention to the problem, we regret that he does not sufficiently specify how attachment styles serve as an integral part of a coordinate life history strategy for either sex.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H. & Schneider, S. M. R. (2004) The heritability of life history strategy: The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology 51:121–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H. & Schneider, S. M. R. (2007) The K-factor, covitality, and personality: A psychometric test of life history theory. Human Nature 18(1):4773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., Hill, D., Wenner, C. J. & Jacobs, W. J. (2006) Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review 26:243–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar