Article contents
The archeology of internalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2002
Abstract
Behavioral regularities are open to both representationist (hence internalist) and non-representationist explanations. Shepard improvidently favors internalism, which is burdened with severe conceptual and empirical shortcomings. Hecht and Kubovy & Epstein half-heartedly criticize internalism by tracing it back to “unconscious” metaphors or by replacing it with weak externalism. Explanations of behavioral regularities are better relocated within a radical embodiment approach. [Hecht; Kubovy & Epstein; Shepard]
- Type
- Brief Report
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2001 Cambridge University Press
- 1
- Cited by