No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2018
This study analyzes the phenomenon of church paintings as subversive visual representations of Fascism and as an act of systematic rebellion against Fascist “ideological marking of space.” Slovene Expressionist painter and sculptor Tone Kralj's (1900−75) paintings functioned as ideological markers of national territory. He painted churches along the ethnic border as it was imagined by the Slovene community, delineating it with visual symbols of anti-Fascism and anti-Nazism. Kralj's undertaking can thus be interpreted as an instance of systematic “subversive coverage” of an ethnically exposed borderland with church paintings. Even today, his artistic “delineation” of the then-disputed ethnic border is a marking phenomenon that cannot be found anywhere else in Europe. If one of the most important authorities on Fascist ideology in Italy, Emilio Gentile, considers Fascist ideology to be a form of political religion and a modern manifestation of the sacralization of politics, then Tone Kralj's church paintings could be regarded as an instance of systematic introduction of the political and ideological into the religious context. Perhaps the most ingenious feature of Kralj's ecclesiastical art is his fusion of Catholicism with the Slovene national idea for the purpose of ideologically marking and promoting anti-Fascism and anti-Nazism as well as Slovene nationalism and Slovene irredentism in the Julian March.
This article was translated by Breda Biščak.
1 Gentile, Emilio, Fašizem, Zgodovina in interpretacije [Fascism, history and interpretation] (Ljubljana, 2010), 12Google Scholar.
2 See Wohinz, Milica Kacin, Primorski Slovenci pod italijansko zasedbo: 1918–1921 [Slovenes under Italian occupation] (Trst, 1972)Google Scholar. See also Verginella, Marta, “Dokončni boj med ‘severnojadranskimi rasami’ v iredentističnem in fašističnem diskurzu” [The Final struggle between the “Northern Adriatic races” in the irredentist and Fascist discourse], Acta Histriae 24, no. 4 (2016): 705–20Google Scholar.
3 Adriano, Andri and Mellinato, Giulio, Scuola e confine: le istituzioni educative della Venezia Giulia 1915–1945, Istituto regionale per la storia del movimento di liberazione nel Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Trieste, 1994), 131Google Scholar.
4 This can be inferred from plethora of materials that became available with the opening of the Vatican Secret Archives from the pontificate of Pope Pius XI in 2006. See Pelikan, Egon, “Cerkev in obmejni fašizem v luči Vatikanskih arhivov” [Church and border Fascism in the Julian March in the light of the Vatican Secret Archives], Acta Histriae 20, no. 4 (2012): 563–76Google Scholar.
5 The Latin phrase literally means “Whose realm, his religion,” meaning that the religion of the ruler was to dictate the religion of those ruled and emerged as a principle following the Peace of Augsburg of 1555.
6 Pelikan, Egon, Tajno delovanje primorske duhovščine pod fašizmom [Secret activities of the Slovenian clergy during Fascism], Nova revija (Ljubljana, 2002), 75Google Scholar.
7 Moore, Niamh and Whelan, Yvonne, eds., Heritage, Memory and the Politics of Identity (Hampshire, 2007)Google Scholar; and Juvan, Marko, “Prostorski obrat, literarna veda in slovenska književnost: uvodni zaris” [The spatial turn, literary studies, and Slovenian literature: An introductory outline], Primerjalna književnost [Comparative literature] 36, no. 2 (2013): 5–26Google Scholar; and Langthaler, Ernst, “Orte in Beziehung Mikrogeschichte nach dem Spatial Turn,” Bewegte Geschichte/Storia in movimento 21, nos. 1/2 (2012): 1–19Google Scholar.
8 Kučan, Ana, Krajina kot nacionalni symbol [Landscape as a national symbol] (Ljubljana, 1998), 9Google Scholar.
9 Döring, Jörg and Thielmann, Tristan, “Was Lesen wir im Raume? Der Spatial Turn und das Geheime Wissen der Geographen,” in Spatial Turn—Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, eds. Döring, Jörg and Thielmann, Tristan (Bielefeld, 2009), 17Google Scholar.
10 Grandits, Hannes, von Hirschhausen, Béatrice, Kraft, Claudia, Müller, Dietmar, and Serrier, Thomas, Phantomgrenzen im östlichen Europa—Eine wissenschaftliche Positionierung (Göttingen, 2015), 13Google Scholar.
11 Boaglio, Gualtiero, Italianità. Eine Begriffsgeschichte (Vienna, 2008)Google Scholar; and Grimm, Reinhold R., Koch, Peter, Stehl, Thomas, and Wehle, Winfried, Italianità. Ein literarisches, sprachliches und kulturelles Identitätsmuster (Tübingen, 2003)Google Scholar.
12 Compare Steinacher, Gerald, “Fascist Legacies: The Controversy over Mussolini's Monuments in South Tyrol,” European Yearbook of Minority Issues 10 (2011): 647–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
13 Klabjan, Borut, “Fašistični Trst: tržaška kulturna krajina v času med svetovnima vojnama” [Fascist Trieste: The Trieste cultural landscape during the interwar period], Studia Historica Slovenica 14, nos. 2/3 (2014): 593–607Google Scholar; and Klabjan, Borut, “Erecting fascism: nation, identity, and space in Trieste in the first half of the twentieth century,” Nationalities Papers (2017), 1–19, doi: 10.1080/00905992.2017.1313216Google Scholar.
14 “Pogovor s slikarjem Tonetom Kraljem” [A conversation with the painter Tone Kralj], Ognjišče 8, no. 4 (1972): 18.
15 Gabriele D'Annunzio (1863–1938) was an Italian military hero, political leader, and the leading Italian author of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. When World War I broke out, he advocated for his country's entry into the war. After Italy declared war on the Central Powers in 1916, he plunged himself into the fighting, seeking out dangerous assignments in several branches of the service, ultimately in the air force, where he lost an eye in combat. D'Annunzio was fond of bold, individual military actions. Two of his best known actions came in 1918: his flight over Vienna (volo di Vienna), where he dropped thousands of propaganda leaflets on the city, and his prank at Buccari Bay (beffa di Buccari), a daring surprise attack on the Austrian fleet with powerboats. In 1919, D'Annunzio and nearly three hundred supporters, in defiance of the Treaty of Versailles, occupied the Dalmatian port of Fiume (today, Rijeka in Croatia), which the Italian government and the Allies were proposing to incorporate into the new Yugoslav state but which D'Annunzio believed rightly belonged to Italy. D'Annunzio ruled Fiume as dictator until December 1920, at which time Italian military forces compelled him to abdicate. Nevertheless, by his bold action, he had established Italy's interest in Fiume, and the port became part of Italy in 1924. D'Annunzio subsequently became an ardent Fascist, and Mussolini rewarded him with a title and national editions of his works. The Fascist regime used D'Annunzio as its icon, a trademark of Fascism in Italy and in Europe.
16 Vinci, Anna Maria, “Per quale italianità?,” in La difesa dell'italianità, eds. D'Amelio, Diego, Michele, Andrea Di, and Mezzalira, Giorgio (Bologna, 2015), 334Google Scholar.
17 Gentile, Emilio, “Fascism as Political Religion,” Journal of Contemporary History 25, nos. 2–3 (1990): 229–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 “Pogovor s slikarjem Tonetom Kraljem,” 18.
19 The Isonzo Front (1915–17) was the site of twelve battles along the Soča/Isonzo River on the eastern sector of the Italian Front during World War I. Located in present-day Slovenia, the Soča/Isonzo River at that time ran roughly north-south just inside Austria along its border with Italy at the head of the Adriatic Sea. The Italians first attacked the Habsburg army in June 1915. For fourteen days, the Italian army attempted to cross the river and scale the heights beyond but was beaten back. Subsequent Italian attacks also failed, until a sixth offensive, in August 1916, when the Italian army captured Görz/Gorizia and secured a bridgehead across the Soča/Isonzo, the Italians’ first real victories on the front. The Italians subsequently changed their tactics but remained unable to penetrate the formidable natural barriers protected by Austrian artillery. In late summer 1917, the Italians struck again, this time with fifty-one divisions and 5,200 guns, and slowly pushed forward, dislodging the Austrians as they advanced. The Germans, fearing the collapse of the Austrian front, sent reinforcements. On 24 October, the Austrian-German forces took the offensive, beginning with a heavy bombardment, and by afternoon the Italian army was in a rout. War-weary territorial troops threw down their arms, the Austrians poured over the Soča/Isonzo, and Caporetto fell, although many Italian units continued to fight as they retreated toward the Piave River. It marked one of the worst defeats in Italian history.
20 Jaworski, Rudolf and Stachel, Peter, Die Besetzung des öffentlichen Raumes (Berlin, 2007), 9Google Scholar.