Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:21:22.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Later Habsburg Concept of Statecraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

William A. Jenks
William A. Jenks
Affiliation:
Washington and Lee University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The historian of the seventeenth century who bewails the absence of a creditable biography of Louis XIV or of William III underlines a significant development of historical writing in the twentieth century. Overpowered by those who deny that biography can be history and convinced that the masses have never secured their due share of attention in early modern times, the scholar uneasily plots an investigation of underground discontent in the gilds of Colbert's day or resolutely pens an essay that destroys once and for all the idea that the workers of France admired Napoleon. Meanwhile, in classes which race from Petrarch to Waterloo, the scholar turned teacher admits that there actually were an age of absolutism and an age of enlightened despotism, for the royal touch is inescapable.

Type
Articles
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 2 , January 1966 , pp. 92 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Fritz, Fellner, “Kaiser Franz Joseph und das Parlament,” Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs, Vol. IX (1956), pp. 287–289.Google Scholar

2 Anton, Chroust, Aufsätze und Vorträge zur fränkischen, deutschen und allgemeinen Geschichte (Leipzig: Gesellschaft für fränkische Geschichte, 1939), p. 184.Google Scholar

3 Fellner, , “Kaiser Franz Joseph und das Parlament,” pp. 291, 338, and 341–342.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., pp. 310–319 and 339–341.

5 Chroust, , Aufsätze und Vorträge zur fränkischen, deutschen und allgemeinen Geschichte, p. 184.Google Scholar

6 Fellner, , “Kaiser Franz Joseph und das Parlament,” pp. 306–309.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., pp. 317–318.

8 August, Weber's memorandum of his audience of December 13, 1879, Paul, Molisch (ed.), Briefe zur deutschen Politik in Österreich von 1848 bis 1918 (Vienna: Wilhelm Braumuller, 1934), pp. 235–243.Google Scholar

9 Haus-, Hof-, und Staatsarchiv (Vienna) (hereafter cited as “St. A. [Vienna]”), Kabinetts-Kanzlei, Vortrag 1403, April 2, 1881.

10 Ibid., Vortrag 1823, April 28, 1881.

11 Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), Österreichische Ministerratsprotokolle, No. 57, June 26, 1882.

12 Moses, Mehring, Die deutsch-böhmische Sprachenfrage während des Ministeriums Taaffe (1879–1893) (unpublished dissertation, University of Vienna, 1924), p. 141.Google Scholar

13 Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), Österreichische Ministerratsprotokolle, No. 2, January 3, 1884, according to Paul, Molisch, Geschichte der deutschnationalen Bewegung in Österreich (Jena: Kurt Knoll, 1926), p. 114. Molisch saw the protocol before it was rendered indecipherable by fire.Google Scholar

14 Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), Österreichische Ministerratsprotokolle, No. 35, April 16, 1885.

15 Mehring, , Die deutsch-böhmische Sprachenfrage während des Ministeriums Taaffe, p. 97.Google Scholar

16 Der politische Nachlass des Grafen Eduard Taaffe, edited by Arthur Skedl (Vienna: Rikola Verlag, 1923), pp. 414–415.

17 von Wertheimer, Eduard, Bismarck im politischen Kampf (Berlin: R. Hobbing, 1930), pp. 518–520.Google Scholar

18 Prážak's comments on Falkenhayn, , Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), Kabinetts-Kanzlei, Vortrag 4136, November 6, 1883.Google Scholar

19 Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), Österreichische Ministerratsprotokolle, No. 38, May 21, 1883.

20 Ministerratsprotokol of May 27, 1890, as reproduced in part in Ludwig, Brügel, Geschichte der österreichischen Sozialdemokratie (5 vols., Vienna: Verlag der Wiener Volksbuchhandlung, 1922–1925), Vol. IV, pp. 127–129.Google Scholar

21 Ernst, Plener, Erinnerungen (3 vols., Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1911–1921), Vol. III, p. 88Google Scholar; Brügel, , Geschichte der österreichischen Sozialdemokratie, Vol. IV, pp. 198–208. Brügel fortunately preserved much of the text of the cabinet meetings between August 18 and September 25, 1893. See also Reuss's dispatch No. 256, A 8321, October 11, 1893, German Foreign Ministry Archives 1867–1920, UC-1, Reel 216, Frames 107–114.Google Scholar

22 Gustav, Kolmer, Parlament und Verfassung in Österreich (8 vols., Vienna: C. Fromme, 1902–1914), Vol. IV, pp. 266–267; Reuss's dispatch No. 239, A 5514, May 12, 1888, German Foreign Ministry Archives 1867–1920, UC-1, Reel 215, Frames 623–624.Google Scholar

23 St. A. (Vienna), Ministerrath für gemeinsame Angelegenheiten, protocol of September 21, 1891, RMRZ 372.

24 Berthold, Sutter, Die Badenischen Sprachenverordnungen von 1897 (2 vols., Graz: Böhlau, 1960), Vol. I, pp. 219–228.Google Scholar

25 Max, von Beck, “Der Kaiser und die Wahlreform,” in Erinnerungen an Franz Joseph I, edited by Eduard, von Steinitz (Berlin: Verlag fü Kulturpolitik, 1931), pp. 200–224Google Scholar; Rudolph, Kiszling, Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand von Österreich-Este (Graz: Böhlau, 1953), pp. 97–100.Google Scholar

26 Heinrich, Friedjung, “Kaiser Franz Joseph I. Ein Charakterbild,” in Historische Aufsätze (Stuttgart: Cotta, 1919)Google Scholar; Heinrich, von Srbik, “Franz Joseph I. Charakter und Regierungsgrundsätze,” in his Aus Österreicha Vergangenheit (Salzburg: Otto Müller, 1949).Google Scholar

27 For Rudolf's thought-world, see Oskar, von Mitis, Dos Leben des Kronprinzen Rudolf (Leipzig: Insel Verlag, 1928), pp. 53, 58, 67–68, 86, 102, 104–109, 114–116, 120–123, 145–149, 151, 156–157, 250, 264, 269–270, 301, and 319–352Google Scholar; and Julius, Szeps (ed.), Kronprinz Rudolf. Politische Briefe an einem Freund 1882–1889 (Vienna: Rikola Verlag, 1922).Google Scholar

28 Letter dated October 20, 1882, St. A. (Vienna), Nachlaes Plener, Karton 17, No. 85–86.

29 Mitis, , Das Leben des Kronprinzen Rudolf, pp. 334 and 346.Google Scholar

30 Letter of November 24, 1882, Szeps, , Kronprinz Rudolf, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar

31 The most revealing studies to date are Kiszling's Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand and Allmayer-Beck's, Johann Christoph Ministerpräsident Baron Beck (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1956).Google Scholar

32 Konzept without date, but before August 17, 1909, St. A. (Vienna), Franz Ferdinand Nachlass, Karton 2.

33 Konzept of a letter to Francis Joseph, without date, but before November, 1911, Ibid.