No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2009
Professor Rothenberg writes that his purpose was not to restate the case for or against Jelačić or to give yet another account of the complicated relationship between Zagreb, Pest, and Vienna. But it is not at all clear what the precise thesis of his paper is. The paper, based largely on archival materials and other primary sources, makes two very worthwhile contributions. It presents an excellent discussion of the appointment of Jelačić (whom the author considers “more a political general than a first rate field commander”) to the office of ban and Jelačić military and political activities during the crucial months of 1848 and 1849. And it enables us to understand more easily some of the more complicated aspects of Croatia's political history at that time.
1 See, for example, Rudolf, Horvat, Ban Jelačić (2 vols., Zagreb: Tisak Hrv. Kat. Tiskovnog Društva, 1909);Google ScholarNeustädter, Joseph Bar., La ban Jelačić et les événements en Croatie depuis I'an 1848 (2 vols., Zagreb: Institut francais, 1940-1942);Google ScholarVaso, Bogdanov, Društvene i političke borbe u Hrvatskoj (Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1949);Google ScholarVaso, Bogdanov, Historija političkih stranaka u Hvatskoj (Zagreb: Novinarsko izdovačko društvo, 1958);Google ScholarVaso, Boganov, Hrvatska Ijevica u godinama revolucije 1848–49 (Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska, 1949);Google ScholarFran, Zwitter, Les problémes nationaux dans la monarchie des Habsbourg (Belgrade: Comité Nationale Yougoslave des Sciences Historiques, 1960);Google ScholarJaroslav, Šidak, “Revolucija godine 1848–49,” Historijski zbornik, Vol. I, No. 1–4 (Zagreb: Povijesno društvo Hrvatske, 1948), pp. 25–41Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Sidak, “Josip Jelačic,” Enciklopedija Jugoslavije, Vol. IV (Zagreb: Leksikografski zavod FNRJ, 1960), pp. 478–480Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Sidak, “Austroslavizam. i Slavenski kongres u Prague 1848,” Historijska pregled, No. 3–4 (Zagreb: Organ Saveza historijskih društava FNRJ, 1960), pp. 204–219Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Šidak, “Listopadska revolucija u Beču 1848,” Historijski pregled. No. 5 (Zagreb: Organ Saveza historijskih društava FNRJ, 1959), pp. 325–329Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Šidak, “Prilozi historiji stranačkih odnosa u Hrvatskoj uoči 1848,” Historijski zbornik, VoL XIII, No. 1–4 (1960), pp. 167–207Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Šidak, “Poslanstvo hrvatskog sabora austrijskom parlamentu g. 1848,” Radovi Filozofskog fakulteta, No. 3 (Zagreb, 1960), pp. 5–37Google Scholar; Jaroslav, Šidak, “Hrvatsko pitanje u Habsbur1škoj monarhiji,” Historijski pregled, No. 2–3 (Zagreb: Organ Saveza historyskih društava FNRJ, 1963), pp. 101–194Google Scholar; and Jaroslav, Šidak, “Seljačko pitanje u Hrvatskoj Politici, 1848,” Jugoslovenski istorijski časopis, No. 2 (Belgrade: Filozofski fakultet. Istorijski seminar, 1963), pp. 3–30Google Scholar. See also the recent Hungarian work by Endre, Kovàcs entitled Magyar-Délszláv Megbékélesi Törekvések 1848–1849-ben (Budapest: Akademiai Kiadó, 1958)Google Scholar; and Szabó, Ervin, Társadalmi és pártharcok a 48-as magyar forradalomban (Bécs: Becsi Magyar Kiadó, 1921).Google Scholar
2 Bogdanov, , Historija političkih stranaka, pp. 307–317.Google Scholar
3 See his “Josip Jelačić,” pp. 478–480.
4 Ferdo, Hauptmann, “Banus Jellačić und Feldmarschall Fürst Windisch-Grätz,” Südost Forschungen, Vol. XV, (1956), pp. 373–402.Google Scholar
5 Bogdanov, , Historija političkih stranaka, p. 311.Google Scholar
6 Bogdanov, , Društvene i političke borbe u Hrvatskoj, pp. 305–306.Google Scholar
7 Hauptmann, , “Banus Jellačtć,” pp. 373–402; Šidak, “Prilozi historiji stranačih odnosa u Hrvatskoj uoči 1848,” pp. 178–183.Google Scholar
8 On the Frontier, see Fran, Vrbanić, “Jedno stoljeće u razvoju broja žiteljstva Hrvatske i Slavonije,” Rad, Vol. CXL (1899), pp. 17–58Google Scholar; Fran, Vrbanić “Prilozi gospodarskom razvoju hrvatsko-slavonske Krajine u 19 vijeku,” Rad, Vol. CXLIV (1900), pp. 40–131Google Scholar; Fedor, Moačanin, “Periodizacija historije Vojne Krajine (XV-XIX st.),” Historijski zbornik, Vol. XIII, No. 1–4 (1960), pp. 111–117Google Scholar; Slavko, Gavrilović, “Viroviticka županija u revoluciji 1848–1849,” Historijski zbornik, Vol. XIV, No. 1–4 (1961), pp. 1–73Google Scholar; Vaso, Bogdanov, “Uloga Vojne Krajine i njenih zastupnika u Hrvatskom saboru 1861,” Zbornik historijskog instituta, No. 3 (Zagreb: Historijski institut Jugoslavenske akademije znanosti t umjetnosti, 1960), pp. 59–214Google Scholar; and Djordjo, Samardžić, “Vojnička Hrvatska,” Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta. No. 8 (Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet, 1960), pp. 315–338Google Scholar. Samardžic has written several other studies on the political and legal conditions on the Military Frontier during and after the French occupation.
9 On the economic aspects of the Frontier, see Josip, Bösendorfer, Agrarni odnosi u Slavoniji (Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1950)Google Scholar. For excellent short treatments, see Jozo, Tomasevich, Peasants, Politics, and Economic Change (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1955)Google Scholar; Slavko, Gavrilović, “Agrarni nemiri u Križevačkoj i Varaždinskoj županiji, 1848–1850,” Historijski zbornik, Vol. XIII, No. 1–4 (1960), pp. 47–110Google Scholar; and Rudolf, Bičanić, Doba manufakture u Hrvatskoj i Slavoniji, 1750–1860, Vol. I (Zagreb: Jugoslavenska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti, 1951).Google Scholar