Article contents
Islam, Anti-Communism, and Christian Civilization: The Ottoman Menace in Interwar Hungary
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2009
Extract
On 4 October 1948, József Cardinal Mindszenty preached a sermon for the rosary feast in front of 35,000 Catholic faithful. He began by reminding his congregation of the origins of the feast day that they were celebrating: the victory of Europe's Christian states over the Ottoman Turkish fleet at the naval battle of Lepanto in 1571. This great victory in the struggle of universal Christendom against the infidel enemy recalled to Mindszenty a second, more particularly Hungarian parallel: the victory of Habsburg forces over the Ottoman Turkish enemy at the battle of Temesvár in 1716. “Hungarian history recalls too such a rosary victory—the Hungarian Christians won it over the Turks in 1716 at Temesvár.” Both military victories represented moments when Europeans had repelled a force seen at the time, and ever after, as hostile to Christian civilization.
- Type
- Forum: The Ottoman Menace
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 2009
References
1 Mindszenty, József Cardinal, Four Years Struggle of the Church in Hungary: Facts and Evidence Published by Order of Josef, Cardinal Mindszenty, Prince Primate of Hungary, trans. by Breitenfeld, Walter C. (London, 1949), 178–80Google Scholar.
2 Kenez, Peter, “The Hungarian Communist Party and the Catholic Church, 1945–1948,” Journal of Modern History 75 (December 2003): 864–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Szabó, Csaba, Die katholische Kirche Ungarns und der Staat in den Jahren 1945–1965 (München, 2003)Google Scholar.
3 Asad, Talal, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford, 2003), 169Google Scholar.
4 van Melis, Damian, “‘Strengthened and Purified Through Ordeal by Fire’: Ecclesiastical Triumphalism in the Ruins of Europe,” in Life After Death: Approaches to a Cultural and Social History of Europe during the 1940s and 1950s, ed. Bessel, Richard and Schumann, Dirk (New York, 2003), 231–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 See, for example, Sezer, Yavuz, “Hungarian Orientalism, Turanism, and Károly Kós's Sztambul (1918),” Centropa: A Journal of Central European Architecture and Related Arts 7, no. 2 (2007): 136–52Google Scholar.
6 See, among many other titles: Vámbéry, Ármin, A magyarság keletkezése és gyarapodása (Budapest, 1895)Google Scholar.
7 Nagy, Éva Kincses, “A turáni gondolat” in Őstörténet és nemzettudat, 1919–1931, ed. Nagy, Éva Kincses (Szeged, 1991), 44–49Google Scholar. [http://www.hik.hu/tankonyvtar/site/books/b144/ch07.html, accessed 15 January 2008]
8 Szabó, Miklós, Az újkonzervativizmus és a jobboldali radikalizmus története (1867–1918) (Budapest, 2003), 292–97Google Scholar.
9 Prohászka, Ottokár, A diadalmas világnézet, in Prohászka Ottokár összegyüjtött munkái, ed. Schütz, Antal (Budapest, 1927)Google Scholar.
10 Prohászka, Ottokár, Kultúra és terror. A társadalmi kérdés, vol. 9, in Összegyűjtött munkái, ed. Schütz, Antal (Budapest, 1927), 270Google Scholar.
11 “Üzlet Gül Baba körül,” Magyar Kultúra 18, no. 23 (5 December 1931): 462–64.
12 Hanebrink, Paul A., In Defense of Christian Hungary: Religion, Nationalism, and Antisemitism, 1890–1944 (Ithaca, 2006)Google Scholar.
13 This view has been articulated most recently in Paul Lendvai's well-received survey of Hungarian history: The Hungarians: A Thousand Years of Victory in Defeat, trans. Ann Major (Princeton, 2003), 98–102.
14 See, e.g., Némedi, Dénes, A népi szociográfia, 1930–1938 (Budapest, 1985)Google Scholar.
15 Balogh, Margit, A KALOT és a katolikus társadalompolitika, 1935–1946 (Budapest, 1998)Google Scholar.
16 Vezérkönyv agrárifjúsági vezetők számára, ed. György Farkas (Szeged, 1937), 85.
17 Clark, Christopher, “The New Catholicism and the European Culture Wars,” in Culture Wars: Secular-Catholic Conflict in Nineteenth-Century Europe, ed. Clark, Christopher and Kaiser, Wolfram (Cambridge, 2003), 11–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
18 Boyer, John W., “Catholics, Christians, and the Challenges of Democracy: The Heritage of the Nineteenth Century,” in Christdemokratie in Europa im 20. Jahrhundert, ed. Gehler, Michael, Kaiser, Wolfram, and Wohnout, Helmut (Vienna-Cologne-Weimar, 2001), 23–59, see esp. 40–44Google Scholar.
19 There is a rich literature on this topic in the Hungarian context. Among the most important interpretations is Gal, Susan, “Bartók's Funeral: Representations of Europe in Hungarian Political Rhetoric,” American Ethnologist 18, no. 3 (1991): 440–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
20 Sík, Sándor, “Pázmány és Erdély,” Jelenkor 2, no. 19 (1 October 1940): 5–6Google Scholar.
21 Szekfű, Gyula, Magyar Történet. A tizenhetedik század, vol. 5 (Budapest, 1935–1936), 292–93Google Scholar.
22 “Vargha László a falu elhagyatottságáról,” Nemzeti Újság (7 October 1936): 17–18.
23 Album Congressus XXXIVi Eucharistici Internationalis (Budapest, 1938), 135.
24 “Speech by the monarchist poet José María Pemán,” in The Spanish Civil War: A Cultural and Historical Reader, ed. Alun Kenwood (Providence, 1993), 58–62. Originally published in ABC, Seville edition, 23 July 1936; broadcast over Radio Sevilla, 15 August 1936. Trans. Alun Kenwood.
25 Mitterauer, Michael, “Politischer Katholizismus, Österreichbewusstsein, und Türkenfeindbild. Zur Aktualisierung der Geschichte bei Jubiläen,” Beiträge zur Sozialkunde 12 (1982): 111–29Google Scholar, citation from 118.
26 On Biró's intransigence, see: Bahlcke, Joachim, “Frederick II of Prussia, Austria, and the Hungarian Protestants: Bishop Márton Padányi Biró of Veszprém and the Enchiridion de Fide,” Austrian History Yearbook 31 (2000): 15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
27 József Cardinal Mindszenty, Memoirs, trans. Richard and Clara Winston (New York, 1974), 11.
28 Mindszenty, Four Years Struggle, 124.
- 2
- Cited by