Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:20:54.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Camil Mureşanu
Camil Mureşanu
Affiliation:
Professor of Modern History at the University of Cluj-Napoca, RO-3400 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Forum: Hungarian Nationalism
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 31 , January 2000 , pp. 169 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The Hungarian tribes settled in Pannonia around 900.

2 This is what Hungarian historiography denies, but that controversy is not the topic of our review.

3 “Nam unius linguae, uniusque moris Regnum imbecille et fragile est.”

4 From Sándor, Petőfi's poem, “Élet vagy halál” (Life or death), written on September 30, 1848.Google Scholar

5 Transylvania's unification with Hungary was persistently required by the Hungarian revolutionaries. Simion, Barnuţiu's Discursul tinut in catedrala din Blaj la 2/14 mai 1848 (The speech delivered in the Blaj cathedral on May 2/14, 1848) (Bucharest, 1909), 148.Google Scholar

6 Pascu, E., Un plan de confédération danubienne roumano-magyaro-serbe en 1859 (Bucharest, 1940), 4.Google Scholar