Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:03:59.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Central Europe: Birthplace of the Modern World?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Steven Beller
Steven Beller
Affiliation:
The author is an independent scholar at 821 South Fairfax Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is not very often that the lands of Central Europe are uppermost in the historical consciousness of Western public opinion. Chamberlainesque ignorance has been the norm. In recent years, however, this situation has been at least partially remedied by two events: the dramatic series of revolutions in Eastern Europe, and—the topic of this essay—the perception of, and fascination with, Central Europe as the place from which our modern world sprang.

Type
Articles
Information
Austrian History Yearbook , Volume 23 , January 1992 , pp. 72 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Center for Austrian Studies, University of Minnesota 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I would like to thank David Sorkin, Allan Janik, and Jack Jacobs for having read the manuscript of this article and given their views on it. I benefited greatly from their advice. The views expressed in this article are, however, my responsibility alone.

2 The leading proponent of this view is Schorske, Carl E., see his fin-de-siécle Vienna: Politics and Culture (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980)Google Scholar.

3 For example, Steiner, George, “Vienna: the Crucible,” televised lecture on the “South Bank Show,” London Weekend Television, 06 16, 1985Google Scholar. Also see Stone, Norman, Europe Transformed (Glasgow: Fontana, 1983), 407–8Google Scholar.

4 See Berner, Peter, Brix, Emil, and Mantl, Wolfgang, eds., Wien um 1900: Aufbruch in die Moderne (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1986)Google Scholar; and Janik, Allan, “Mitteleuropa—ein post-modernes Projekt,” Wiener Journal 78 (03 1987): 21Google Scholar. Also see Busek, Erhard and Brix, Emil, Projekt Mitteleuropa (Vienna: Ueberreuter, 1987)Google Scholar.

5 See Anderson, Perry, “Components of the National Culture,” New Left Review 50 (July–August 1968): 17Google Scholar.

6 See Lukacs, John, Budapest 1900: A Historical Portrait of a City and Its Culture (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989)Google Scholar.

7 See Magris, Claudio, “Le flambeau d'Ewald,” and Jean Clair, “Une modernité sceptique,” both excellent and both in the catalogue to the Paris exhibition, Vienne 1880–1938, l'apocalypse joyeuse (Paris: Editions du Centre Pompidou, 1986), 20–28 and 46–57, respectivelyGoogle Scholar. Also Magris, Claudio, Danube (London: Collins Harvill, 1989)Google Scholar.

8 See the entertaining discussion “The Name and Nature of Modernism,” by Brad-bury, Malcolm and McFarlane, James, in Modernism, 1890–1930, ed. Bradbury, Malcolm and McFarlane, James (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976), 19–56Google Scholar.

9 Schorske, Fin-de-siècle Vienna, xxiii, 5ff.

10 See Pollak, Michael, Vienne 1900: Une identité blessée (Paris: Gallimard/Juillard, 1984)Google Scholar; Timms, Edward, Karl Kraus, Apocalyptic Satirist: Culture and Catastrophe in Habsburg Vienna (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; and Janik, Allan and Toulmin, Stephen, Wittgenstein's Vienna (New York: Touchstone, 1973)Google Scholar.

11 See Gluck, Mary, Georg Lukács and His Generation, 1900–1918 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

12 The full discussion of the following data is given in my book, Vienna and the Jews, 1867–1938: A Cultural History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 14–32Google Scholar.

13 Ibid., 33–70.

14 See McCagg, William O., Jewish Nobles and Geniuses in Modern Hungary (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972) and Lukacs, Budapest 1900, 92–96Google Scholar.

15 See Cohen, Gary, “Jews in German Society: Prague 1860–1914,” Central European History 10 (1977): 28–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 On this and the following discussion of the Jewish experience of Vienna, see Beller, Vienna and the jews, 73ff.

17 See Magris, Claudio, Weit von wo? (Vienna: Europa Verlag, 1974), 160ffGoogle Scholar. The “structural equality” of the traditional Jewish community did not preclude differentiation in terms of wealth (class) and education; and there were elements of externally imposed hierarchy. The latter were, however, nothing to compare to the estates of Gentile society, and as for the former point, discrimination on terms of wealth and education was to be the foundation on which nineteenth-century liberal bourgeois society was built, in which Jews were to figure so prominently. See Kestenberg-Gladstein, Ruth, Neuere Geschichte der juden in den böhmischen Ländern. Erster Teil: Das Zeitalter der Aufklärung, 1780–1830 (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1969), 15ffGoogle Scholar.

18 See Evans, R.J.W., The Making of the Habsburg Monarchy, 1550–1700 (Oxford: Clarendon Press: 1979), 443Google Scholar.

19 See Sorkin, David, The Transformation of German Jewry, 1780–1840 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

20 See Lazarus, Moritz, Die Ethik des Judenthums (Frankfurt, 1898), 250ffGoogle Scholar.

21 See Sorkin, , Transformation, passim. On Jellinek, see his series of essays, “Der jüdische Stamm,” in Die Neuzeit, 11 8, 1861, et seq., esp. December 13, 1861, 179–81Google Scholar. For a similar and most interesting identification at the end of the period, see Bienenfeld, Franz Rudolf, The Religion of the Non-Religious Jews (London: Museum Press, 1944)Google Scholar. (Originally given as a lecture in Vienna in 1937.)

22 See Tietze, Hans, Die Juden Wiens (Leipzig and Vienna: E. P. Tal, 1935), 165Google Scholar.

23 See the stimulating discussion on this phenomenon as regards German Jewry in Mosse, George L., German Jews beyond Judaism (Cincinnati: Hebrew Union College Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

24 See McGrath, William, Dionysian Art and Populist Politics in Austria (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1974), 197–207Google Scholar.

25 Vielmetti, Nikolaus, “Zur Geschichte der Wiener Juden in Vormärz,” in 1,000 Jahre österreichisches Judentum, ed. Lohrmann, Klaus (Eisenstadt: Roetzer, 1982), 93–111Google Scholar.

26 See Kieval, Hillel, The Making of Czech Jewry, 1870–1918 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

27 Broch, Hermann, “Hofmannsthal und seine Zeit,” in Broch, , Schriften zur Literatur 1 (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1975), 167Google Scholar. This essay is now available in English, as Hugo von Hofmannsthal and His Time: The European Imagination, 1860–1920, trans, and ed. Steinberg, Michael P. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

28 See Bahr, Hermann, Selbstbildnis (Berlin, 1923), 108ffGoogle Scholar.

29 See Steed, Henry Wickham, Through Thirty Years (London, 1924), 195Google Scholar.

30 Schnitzler, Olga, Spiegelbild der Freundschaft (Vienna, 1962), 41Google Scholar. See also William M. Johnston, The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848–1938 (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press), 39ff., esp. 48, for Kraus's coinage.

31 See Roth, Joseph, Die Kapuzinergruft (Munich: DTV, 1967), 57Google Scholar.

32 See Hofmann, Paul, The Viennese: Splendor, Twilight, and Exile (New York: Anchor, 1988), 5–6Google Scholar.

33 See Steed, Through Thirty Years, 328.

34 Hašek, Jaroslav, The Good Soldier Švejk and His Fortunes in the World War (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974)Google Scholar.

35 Broch, Hofmannsthal, 135ff.

36 Tietze, Juden, 233.

37 For a similar argument, see Suess's, Eduard speech in the Reichstag, reported in Neue Freie Presse, morning edition, 03 29, 1895Google Scholar. On the history of Austrian anti-Semitism see Pulzer, Peter, The Rise of Political Anti-Semitism in Germany and Austria, rev. ed. (London: Peter Halban, 1988)Google Scholar.

38 On Tiszaeszlar see Katz, Jakob, From Prejudice to Destruction: Anti-Semitism, 1700–1933 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980), 275–78Google Scholar; on Hilsner, see Červinka, František, “The Hilsner Affair,” Leo Baeck Institute Yearbook 13 (1968): 142–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Gluck, Lukács, 54ff.

40 See McGrath, William, Freud's Discovery of Psychoanalysis: The Politics of Hysteria (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

41 Schnitzler, Arthur, Der Weg ins Freie (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1978), 205Google Scholar. On Schnitzler's thought, and his relation to his Jewish background, see Abels, Norbert, Sicherheit ist nirgends: Judentum und Aufklärung bei Arthur Schnitzler (Königstein: Athenäum, 1982)Google Scholar.

42 Budapest before 1914 did not experience the success of anti-Semitism to the same degree as Vienna or even Prague. This may well explain why its intelligentsia were less wary of modernity than its counterparts in the other cities. See Gluck, Lukdás, 54–105. On the other hand there were plainly very large problems between the conservative Magyar gentry and the Jewish intellectual circles. Lukacs, Budapest 1900, 187ff. Also see Gluck's, interesting article on developments in modernism after 1914, “Toward a Historical Definition of Modernism: Georg Lukács and the Avant-Garde,” Journal of Modern History, 58 (1986): 845–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 See Janik, Allan, “Vienna 1900: Reflections on Problems and Methods,” in Die Wiener Moderne, ed. Brix, E. and Werkner, P. (Vienna: Verlag für Geschichte und Politik, 1990), 156–57Google Scholar.

44 On Schoenberg's Moses and Aaron see the essay by Steiner, George, “Schoenberg's Moses and Aaron,” in Encounter 24 (1965): 40–46Google Scholar. On the general argument, see Janik and Toulmin, Wittgenstein's Vienna, 263–75.