¹ Neck, Rudolf, “Von der Koalition zur Konfrontation. Die erste Etappe,” in Die Ereignisse des 15. Juli 1927. Protokoll des Symposiums in Wien am 15. Juni 1977 (Vienna, 1977), 14–15Google Scholar.

² Pauley, Bruce F., From Prejudice to Persecution: A History of Austrian Anti-Semitism (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1992), 100–101Google Scholar.

³ Tremmel, Ferdinand, Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte Österreichs. Von den Anfangen bis 1955 (Vienna, 1969), 386Google Scholar; Rothschild, K. W., Austria's Economic Development between the Two Wars (London, 1947), 38–39Google Scholar; Botz, Gerhard, “[Der 15. Juli 1927], seine Ursachen und Folgen,” in Österreich 1927 bis 1938. Protokoll des Symposiums in Wien, 23. bis 28. Oktober 1911 (Vienna, 1973), 34Google Scholar.

⁴ Schmitz, Richard, “Biographische Memoiren”: (A) “Aus dem Leben eines politischen Gefangenen”; (B) “Im Konzentrarionslager Dachau” (in typescript at the University of Vienna library) (Vienna, 1971), 14Google Scholar; Botz, Gerhard, Gewalt in der Politik. Attentate, Zusammenstöβe, Putschversuche, Unruhen in Österreich 1918 bis 1934 (Munich, 1976), 87–138, 142Google Scholar; idem, “Gewalt und politischgesellschaftlicher Konflikt in der Ersten Republik (1918 bis 1933),” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 4 (1975): 515–27.

⁵ Kunschak, Leopold, Österreich 1918–1934 (Vienna, 1934), 86Google Scholar; Renner, Karl, Nachgelassene Werke, vol. 2: Österreich von der ersten zur zweiten Republik (Vienna, 1953), 76Google Scholar; Gruber, Helmut, Red Vienna: Experiment in Working-Class Culture, 1919–1934 (New York, 1991), 42Google Scholar; Rabinbach, Anson, The Crisis of Austrian Socialism: From Red Vienna to Civil War, 1927–1934 (Chicago, 1983), 32Google Scholar.

⁶ Pollak, Walter, Sozialismus in Österreich. Von der Donaumonarchie bis zur Ära Kreisky (Vienna, 1979), 184–85Google Scholar; Rabinbach, The Crisis of Austrian Socialism, 33. For a good discussion of the Schattendorf trial, see Viktor Liebscher, “Die österreichische Geschwornengerichtsbarkeit und die Juliereignisse 1927,” in Die Ereignisse des 15. Juli 1927, 75–87.

⁷ Gulick, Charles, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2 vols. (Berkeley, Calif., 1948), 1:734Google Scholar.

⁸ Thus, when a group of electrical workers came to the editorial office of the Arbeiter-Zeitung, where a half dozen party leaders were meeting, to demand that the party call a general strike and lead a demonstration, Bauer jumped into an elevator to avoid the delegation, who left the office empty-handed. See Bauer, Otto, “Die Juliereignisse,” Arbeiterwille (Graz), 07 29, 1927Google Scholar, as reprinted in Otto Bauer. Werkausgabe, ed. Hugo Pepper, published by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für die Geschichte der österreichischen Arbeiterbewegung, 9 vols. (Vienna, 1975–1980), 7:652–53; Wilhelm Ellenbogen, “Otto Bauer,” in idem, Menschen und Prinzipien. Erinnerungen, Urteile und Reflexionen eines kritischen Sozialdemokraten (Vienna, 1981), 67; Andics, Helmut, 50 Jahre unseres Lebens. Österreichs Schicksal seit 1918 (Vienna, 1968), 155–56Google Scholar; Fischer, Ernst, Erinnerungen und Reflexionen (Hamburg, 1969), 168–91Google Scholar; Peter Loewenberg, “Austro-Marxism and Revolution: Otto Bauer, Freud's ‘Dora’ Case and the Crises of the First Austrian Republic,” in idem, Decoding the Past: The Psychohistorical Approach (New York, 1983), 174; Alder, Douglas D., “Decision-Making amid Public Violence: The Vienna Riots, July 15, 1927,” Austrian History Yearbook 19–20, pt. 1 (1983–1984): 244Google Scholar; Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 144–45; and Leichter, Otto, Glanz und Ende der ersten Republik. Wie es zum österreichischen Bürgerkrieg kam (Vienna, 1964), 51–52Google Scholar.

⁹ Karl Haas, “Die österreichische Sozialdemokratie in der Konfliktsituation des Juli 1927,” in Die Ereignisse des 15. Juli1927, 137. See also Alder, “Decision-Making amid Public Violence,” 245–46; Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 1:736–37; Pollak, Sozialismus in Österreich, 185; Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 146; and Schneidemadl, Heinrich, über Dollfuβ zu Hitler. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des 12. Februar 1934, with a foreword by Ernst Winkler (Vienna, 1964), 6Google Scholar.

¹⁰ Haas, “Die osterreichische Sozialdemokratie,” 138–40; Alder, “Decision-Making amid Public Violence,” 246–54; Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 1:735–46; Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 146–52; Andics, 50 Jahre unseres Lebens, 156–60; Gerhard Botz, “Die ‘Juli-Demonstranten’, ihre Motive und die quantifizierbaren Ursachen des ‘15. Juli 1927,’” in Die Ereignisse des 15. juli 1927, 50–55 (reprinted in Gerhard Botz, Krisenzonen einer Demokratie. Gewalt, Streik und Konfliktunterdruckung in Österreich seit 1918 [Frankfurt, 1987], 65–117); Pollak, Sozialismus in Österreich, 187.

¹¹ Bauer, “Die Juliereignisse,” 654–55; Alder, “Decision-Making amid Public Violence,” 254–55; Haas, “Die österreichische Sozialdemokratie,” 140–41.

¹² Andics, 50 Jahre unseres Lebens, 160; Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 1:748–50; Pollak, Sozialismus in Österreich, 187; Leichter, Glanz und Ende der Ersten Republik, 51–58; Carsten, L. L., Fascist Movements in Austria: From Schönerer to Hitler (London, 1977), 111–12Google Scholar.

¹³ Hannak, Jacques, Karl Renner und seine Zeit. Versuch einer Biographie (Vienna, 1965), 483Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Loewenberg, “Austro-Marxism and Revolution,” 174. See also Braunthal, Julius, “Otto Bauer. Ein Lebensbild,” in Otto Bauer. Eine Auswahl aus seinem Lebenswerk. Mit einem Lebensbild Otto Baiters, ed. Braunthal, Julius (Vienna, 1961), 68Google Scholar.

¹⁵ Leser, Norbert, “Die Rolle der Sozialdemokratie in der Ersten Republik,” in Österreich 1934–1984. Erfahrungen, Erkenntnisse, Besinnung, ed. Desput, Joseph F. (Graz, 1984), 149Google Scholar.

¹⁶ Bauer, Otto, “Kritiker links und rechts,” Der Kampf 20 (1927)Google Scholar, as reprinted in Otto Bauer. Werkausgabe, ed. Pepper, 9:153; Pollak, Sozialismus in Österreich, 188; Leser, Norbert, Zwischen Reformismus und Bolschewismus. Der Austromarxismus als Theorie und Praxis (Vienna, 1968), 400–401Google Scholar.

¹⁷ Sully, Melanie A., Continuity and Change in Austrian Socialism: The Eternal Quest for the Third Way (Boulder, Colo., 1982), 55Google Scholar; Haas, “Die österreichische Sozialdemokratie,” 148–49.

¹⁸ Duczynska, Ilona, Workers in Arms: The Austrian Schutzbund and the Civil War of 1934, with an introduction by Hobsbawm, E. J. (New York, 1978), 87Google Scholar.

¹⁹ As quoted in ibid, 88.

²⁰ lbid., 87–92; Kollman, Eric C., Theodor Körner, Militär und Politik (Vienna, 1973), 201–3Google Scholar.

²¹ Leichter, , Glanz und Ende der Ersten Republik, 65–66; Oskar Helmer, 50 Jahre erlebte Geschichte (Vienna, [1957]), 118Google Scholar; Rabinbach, The Crisis of Austrian Socialism, 50.

²² As cited in Klemperer, Klemens von, Ignaz Seipel, Christian Statesman in a Time of Crisis (Princeton, N.J., 1972), 265Google Scholar. For the Bauer-Seipel negotiations, see especially Haas, “Die österreichische Sozialdemokratie,” 141–48.

²³ As quoted in Klemperer, Ignaz Seipel, 266–67. See also Otto Bauer, “Ignaz Seipel,” ArbeiterZeitung, Apr. 3, 1932, as reprinted in Otto Bauer, ed. Braunthal, 239.

²⁴ Schneidemadl, über Dollfuβ zu Hitler, 8–9; Schumy Nachlafi, pt. 2: “Landbund” (manuscript in the archives of the Institut für Zeitgeschichte [Vienna]), 76.

²⁵ Dachs, Herbert, “Franz Rehrl und die Bundespolitik,” in Franz Rehrl, Landeshauptmann von Salzburg 1922–1938, ed. Huber, Wolfgang (Salzburg, 1975), 240Google Scholar; Wandruszka, Adam, “Österreichs politische Struktur. Die Entwicklung der Parteien und politischen Bewegungen,” in Geschichte der Republik Österreich, ed. Benedikt, Heinrich (Munich, 1954), 336–37Google Scholar.

²⁶ Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 111–12; Winkler, Franz, Die Diktatur in Oesterreich (Zurich, 1935), 25–26Google Scholar.

²⁷ Wiltschegg, Walter, Die Heimwehr. Eine unwiderstehliche Volksbewegung? (Vienna, 1985), 40–41Google Scholar; Leichter, Glanz und Ende der Ersten Republik, 59–61; Edmondson, C. Earl, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 1918–1936 (Athens, Ga., 1978), 51Google Scholar.

²⁸ Edmondson, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 57.

²⁹ Leichter, Glanz und Ende der Ersten Republik, 61.

³⁰ Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 123.

³¹ Edmondson, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 53–54; Klemperer, Klemens von, “Ignaz Seipel 1876 bis 1932,” in Die österreichischen Bundeskanzler. Leben und Werk, ed. Weissensteiner, Friedrich and Weinzierl, Erika (Vienna, 1983), 109Google Scholar; Klemperer, Ignaz Seipel, 274–75.

³² “Morreale—Mussolini gegen Hitler auf den österreichischen Ring (Eigene Erinnerungen und italienische Geheimdokumente über Mussolinis Versuch, den Anschluβ zu verhindern)” (typed manuscript in the archive of the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Vienna), pt. 2, 14. Eugenio Morreale, the press attaché at the Italian embassy and a reporter for Mussolini's newspaper, Il Popolo d'ltalia, was one of the two main Italian observers of Austrian political life. The other was the Italian minister in Vienna, Giacinto Auriti. For overall discussions of Italian foreign policy in the area, see Macartney, Maxwell H. H. and Cremona, Paul, Italy's Foreign and Colonial Policy, 1914–1937 (London, 1938), 192–99Google Scholar; Cassels, Alan, Mussolini's Early Diplomacy (Princeton, N.J., 1970), especially 315–52Google Scholar; and de Felice, Renzo, Mussolini il duce. Gli anni del consenso 1929–1936 (Turin, 1974), 323–65Google Scholar. See also Collotti, Enzo, “Die Faschisierung des italienischen Staates und die fortschreitende Beeinflussung österreichischer Rechtsgruppen,” in Der 4. Márz 1933. Vom Verfassungsbruch der Diktatur. Beiträge zum wissenschaftlichen Symposion des Dr.-Karl-RennerInstituts abgehalten am 28. Februar und 1. März 1983 in Wien, ed. Fröschl, Erich and Zoitl, Helge (Vienna, 1984), 149Google Scholar; and my own article entitled “Mussolini, Bethlen, and the Heimwehr in 1928–1930,” in The Mirror of History: Essays in Honor of Fritz Fellner, ed. Wank, Solomon et al. (Santa Barbara, Calif., 1988), 432Google Scholar. I wish to thank Solomon Wank for giving me permission to incorporate extensive segments of that article into this particular study.

³³ “Morreale—Mussolini gegen Hitler,” 10–11; Jedlicka, Ludwig, “Österreich und Italien 1922–1938,” in Innsbruck-Venedig. Österreichisch-italienische Historikertreffen 1971 und 1972, ed. Wandruszka, Adam and Jedlicka, Ludwig (Vienna, 1975), 205–6Google Scholar; excerpts from the notes of the conference between the Italian minister-president Mussolini and Hungarian minister-president Bethlen, Milan, Apr. 2, 1928, in Kerekes, Lajos, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen zwischen der Bethlen-Regierung und der österreichischen Heimwehrbewegung,” Acta Historica. Zeitschrift der ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaft 9, no. 1–4 (1965): 308–9Google Scholar. See also Kerekes, Lajos, “Italien, Ungarn und die österreichische Heimwehrbewegung 1928–1931,” Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur 9, no. 1 (1965): 3–4Google Scholar; and Jedlicka, Ludwig, “The Austrian Heimwehr,” Journal of Contemporary History 1, no. 1 (1966): 134–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁴ Kerekes, “Italien, Ungarn und die österreichische Heimwehrbewegung,” 2–3; I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 6, 59–60 n; Auriti to Mussolini, Vienna, Jan. 5, 1928, ibid., doc. no. 5, p. 3. Fifteen volumes of the seventh series, covering the period between October 31, 1922, and March 17, 1934, were published in Rome by the Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato between 1953 and 1989. For this and the next few paragraphs, see also Rath, “Mussolini, Bethlen, and the Heimwehr,” 433–36.

³⁵ Giulio Ricciardi's memorandum to Mussolini, dated Rome, Apr. 27, 1927, with Steidle's and Pabst's petition annexed to it, I documenti diplomatic! italiani, vol. 5, doc. no. 168, pp. 176–78.

³⁶ Excerpts from the notes on the conference between the Italian minister-president Mussolini and Hungarian minister-president Bethlen, Milan, Apr. 2, 1928, in Kerekes, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” 309; Jedlicka, “The Austrian Heimwehr,” 135.

³⁷ Continuation of report 83 (secret) signed by András Hory, in Kerekes, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” 315.

³⁸ András Hory to Sándor Khuen-Héderváry, Rome, June 26, 1928, ibid., 314.

³⁹ Steidle's memorandum for the Hungarian and Italian governments, Innsbruck, May 23, 1928, ibid., 309–12; Gábor Apor's notes on the conference between Bethlen and Steidle, Budapest, June 8, 1928, ibid., 312; Apor's notes on the conference between Bethlen and Steidle, Fenyõd-Bélatelep, July 28, 1928, ibid., 315; “Morreale—Mussolini gegen Hitler,” pt. 2, 16.

⁴⁰ Apor's notes on the conference between Bethlen and Steidle, Fenyõd-Bélatelep, July 28, 1928, in Kerekes, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” 316. See also Wiltschegg, Die Heimwehr, 45.

⁴¹ De Astis, to Grandi, , Budapest, 07 31, 1928, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 6, doc. no. 528, p. 470Google Scholar.

⁴² Kerekes, “Italien, Ungarn und die österreichische Heimwehrbewegung,” 6; Kerekes, Lajos, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie. Mussolini, Gömbös und die Heimwehr (Vienna, 1966), 24, 27–29Google Scholar; Edmondson, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 63–67; “Morreale—Mussolini gegen Hitler,” pt. 2, 16; Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 164–66.

⁴³ Wodianer's, Andor report on a conference with Grandi, Rome, 10 10, 1928, in Kerekes, , “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” 304 nGoogle Scholar.

⁴⁴ di Monza, Durini to Mussolini, , Budapest, 01 19, 1929, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 7, doc. no. 194, pp. 219–20Google Scholar; Morreale's notes, Vienna, Apr. 19, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 76, p. 386; Auriti to Mussolini, Vienna, July 25, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 562, p. 551; pledge of Aug. 10, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 590, p. 387. A copy of this pledge can also be found in Kerekes, “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” 324–25.

⁴⁵ See especially Seipel's, speech at the University of Tübingen on 07 26, 1929, quoted in Jedlicka, , “The Austrian Heimwehr,” 133–34Google Scholar.

⁴⁶ Klemperer, Ignaz Seipel, 351; Ludwig, Eduard, Österreichs Sendung im Donauraum. Die letz n Dezennien österreichischer Innen- und Aussenpolitik (Vienna, 1954), 67–68Google Scholar; Goldinger, Walter, Geschichte der Republik Österreich (Vienna, 1962), 142Google Scholar. See also Rath, “Mussolini, Bethlen, and the Heimwehr,” 436–37.

⁴⁷ Morreale, memorandum, Vienna, 09 10, 1929, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 6, doc. no. 619, p. 617Google Scholar. See also Auriti to Mussolini, Vienna, July 25, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 562, pp. 551–52; Auriti to Mussolini, Vienna, Aug. 21, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 601, p. 601.

⁴⁸ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 19, 1929, ibid., vol. 8, doc. no. 10, p. 21; report entitled “Situation in Austria” appended to De Astis to Grandi, Budapest, Sept. 18, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 8, p. 15; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 21, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 25, p. 45.

⁴⁹ Morreale's notes on a conversation with Seipel, appended to Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 4, 1930, ibid., vol. 9, doc. no. 287, p. 397. See also Auriti to Mussolini, July 25, 1929, ibid., vol. 7, doc. no. 562, p. 552; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Jan. 7, 1930, ibid., vol. 8, doc. no. 300, p. 326.

⁵⁰ Oxilia to Gazzera, Budapest, Sept. 14, 1929, Annex 2 of De Astis to Grandi, Budapest, Sept. 18, 1929, ibid., vol. 8, doc. no. 8, pp. 16–17; Auriti to Mussolini, Aug. 21, 1929, ibid., vol. 7, doc. no. 601, p. 601.

⁵¹ Auriti to Mussolini, Aug. 21, 1929, ibid, vol. 7, doc. no. 601, pp. 600–601. For the events at St. Lorenzen, see especially Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 171–82.

⁵² Walkó's, Lajos notes on his conference with Mussolini, Rome, 09 12, 1928, in Kerekes, , “Akten zu den geheimen Verbindungen,” 326–27Google Scholar.

⁵³ Walkó's conference with Steidle, Vienna, Sept. 20, 1929, ibid., 329. See also Walkó's conference with Seipel, Vienna, Sept. 19, 1929, ibid., 328–29.

⁵⁴ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 09 27, 1929, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 8, doc. no. 25, p. 45Google Scholar. See also Veiter, Theodor, “Das 34er Jahr”. Bürgerkrieg in Österreich (Vienna, 1984), 51Google Scholar; and Kerekes, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie, 60.

⁵⁵ Kerekes, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie, 51; Kondert, Reinhart, “Schober und die Heim-wehr. Der Niedergang des Austrofaschismus 1929–1930,” Zeitgeschichte 3, no. 6 (03. 1976): 165Google Scholar.

⁵⁶ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 09 27, 1929, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 8, doc. no. 25, p. 43Google Scholar.

⁵⁷ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 8, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 37, p. 59.

⁵⁸ Grandi to Auriti, Rome, Oct. 18, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 84, p. 107.

⁵⁹ Leser, Norbert, “Die Rolle der Sozialdemokratie bei der Verfassungsreform 1929,” in Die österreichische Verfassung von 1918 bis 1938. Protokoll des Symposium in Wien am 19. Oktober 1977 (Vienna, 1980), 71–73Google Scholar (quote on 71); Leichter, Glanz und Ende der Ersten Republik, 90–93; Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2:867–74.

⁶⁰ Kerekes, Abenddámmerung einer Demokratie, 55–56.

⁶¹ Grandi, to di Monza, Durini, Rome, 10 31, 1929, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 8, doc. no. 127, p. 143Google Scholar. See also Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 8, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 141, pp. 160–61.

⁶² Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 19, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 109, pp. 109–12 (quote on 112); Durini di Monza to Grandi, Budapest, Nov. 6, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 138, p. 159.

⁶³ Grandi to Durini di Monza, Rome, Oct. 22, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 98, p. 118; Grandi to Auriti, Rome, Oct. 22, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 101, pp. 119–20.

⁶⁴ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 25, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 108, p. 125.

⁶⁵ Grandi to Auriti, Rome, Oct. 26, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 112, pp. 129–30.

⁶⁶ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 19, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 167, pp. 183–84; Morreale report, Nov. 4, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 136, p. 156.

⁶⁷ Article 60 of the 1920 constitution as revised by paragraph 30 of the 1929 B-VG Novelle (hereafter cited as “B-VG, 1929 text”), in Texte zur österreichischen Verfassungs-Geschichte. Von der Pragmatischen Sanktion zur Bundesverfassung (1713–1966), ed. Fischer, Heinz and Silvestri, Gerhard (Vienna, 1970), 238Google Scholar. For the constitutional revisions made in 1929, see also MacDonald, Mary, The Republic of Austria: A Study in the Failure of Democratic Government (London, 1946), 49–62Google Scholar; and Leser, “Die Rolle der Sozialdemokratie,” in Die österreichische Verfassung, 69–74.

⁶⁸ Articles 70, 28, 29, and 18 of the 1929 constitution as revised by paragraphs 36, 13, 14, and 6 of B-VG, 1929 text, in Texte zur österreichischen Verfassungs-Geschichte, ed. Fischer, and Silvestri, , pp. 234, 236, 239Google Scholar.

⁹ Ricciardi to Grandi, Innsbruck, , 12. 9, 1929, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 8, doc. no. 232, pp. 239–40Google Scholar. For a good evaluation of the defects of the Heimwehr, see Morreale's report of Nov. 4, 1929, ibid., doc. no. 136, pp. 154–55.

⁷⁰ Eduard Ludwig, Österreichs Sendung im Donauraum, 75; Winkler, Die Diktatur in Oesterreich, 29–30; Kondert, “Schober and the Heimwehr,” 167–69. It should be noted that Bauer also approved Schober's plan to disarm the parliamentary organizations. See Bauer, to Adler, Friedrich, 04 3, 1930, Otto Bauer. Werkausgabe, ed. Pepper, , 9:1073–76Google Scholar. Mussolini expressed the opinion that since it was apparent that Schober was submitting to pressures from London and Paris, he hoped that “the Heimwehr will find a way again to support the government.” Egger, to General Secretary, Rome, 051 30, 1930Google Scholar (telegram), Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv (Vienna), Neue Politische Akten (Vienna), carton 477, no. 27.646–13/30, fol. 325.

⁷¹ Jedlicka, “The Austrian Heimwehr,” 118. See also Jedlicka, Ludwig, “Zur Vorgeschichte der Korneuburger Eides,” Österreich in Geschichte und Literatur 7, no. 4 (04 1963): 146–53Google Scholar; Edmondson, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 97–100.

⁷² Morreale's notes concerning his conversations with the Heimwehr leaders, appended to Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, , 05 25, 1930, documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 9, doc. no. 59, p. 85Google Scholar.

⁷³ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 10, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 242, pp. 334–35.

⁷⁴ Jedlicka, “The Austrian Heimwehr,” 118. For the Strafella affair, see espeially Staudinger, Anton, “Bemühungen Carl Vaugoins um Suprematie der christlichsozialen Partei in Österreich (1930–1933)” (Ph.D. diss., University of Vienna, 1969), 26–37Google Scholar; idem, “Carl Vaugoin 1873 bis 1949,” in Die österreichischen Bundeskanzler, ed. Weissensteiner and Weinzierl, 154; Schumy Nachlaβ, pt. 2: “Landbund,” 92–93; Kerekes, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie, 81–82; Helmer, 50 Jahre erlebte Geschichte, 123–24.

⁷⁵ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, Sept. 27, 1930, documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 9, doc. no. 275, pp. 373–77Google Scholar; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 30, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 281, pp. 390–91; Staudinger, “Carl Vaugoin 1873 bis 1949,” 154; Veiter, “Das 34^er Jahr,” 63.

⁷⁶ Kluge, Ulrich, Bauern, Agrarkrise und Volksernährung in der europäischen Zwischenkriegszeit. Studien zur Agrargesellschaft und -wirtschaft der Republik Österreich 1918 bis 1938 (Stuttgart, 1988), 332–33Google Scholar. See also Scheu, Friedrich, Der Weg ins ungewisse. Österreichs Schicksalskurve 1929–1938 (Vienna, 1972), 75Google Scholar.

⁷⁷ Morreale's notes appended to Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 10 4, 1930, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 9, doc. no. 287, p. 397Google Scholar; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 5, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 290, pp. 405–6; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 13, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 296, p. 417.

⁷⁸ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 13, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 296, p. 416.

⁷⁹ Starhemberg to Mussolini, Vienna, Oct. 21, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 319, p. 452; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 13, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 296, pp. 417–20; Kerekes, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie, 86.

⁸⁰ Arlotta, to Grandi, , Budapest, 10 18, 1930, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 9, doc. no. 308, pp. 433–36Google Scholar. Auriti disagreed sharply with Arlotta's report about Hungarian opposition to Starhemberg's plans for a coup. See Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 25, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 406, pp. 583–84.

⁸¹ Geisser Celesia to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 21, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 318, pp. 450–52.

⁸² Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 25, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 326, p. 465.

⁸³ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 11, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 369, p. 524. On December 27 Auriti wrote Grandi that Starhemberg “was ready to march to stage a coup d'état, and only the weakness of Vaugoin, who is a friend of the Heimwehr but not part of it, prevented the scheme from being executed.” Ibid.1, doc. no. 476, p. 706.

⁸⁴ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 31, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 342, p. 489.

⁸⁵ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 6–8, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 380, p. 510.

⁸⁶ See the discussion of the 1927 elections early in this essay.

⁸⁷ Rot-Weiss-Rot Buck. Gerechtigkeit für Österreich! Darstellungen, Dokumente und Nachweise zur Vorgeschichte und Geschichte der Okkupation Österreichs, pt. 1: (nach amtlichen Quellen) (Vienna, 1946), 28.

⁸⁸ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 11 15, 1930, documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 9, doc. no. 377, p. 539Google Scholar; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 18, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 385, p. 552; Grandi to Auriti, Rome, Nov. 19, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 386, p. 553; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 21–22, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 396, pp. 568–70.

⁸⁹ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 30, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 428, pp. 624–25.

⁹⁰ Ender to president of the Nationalrat, Dec. 4, 1930, Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates, 2nd session on Dec. 4, 1930, of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), vol. 1, p. 7Google Scholar. For Ender's policies and actions as chancellor, see Gerhard Wanner, “Otto Ender 1875 bis 1960,” in Die österreichischen Bundeskanzler, ed. Weissensteiner and Weinzierl, 162–66, 171–72; Huebmer, Hans, Dr. Otto Ender (Dornbirn, 1957), 128–43Google Scholar; and Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 123–34 (see n. 5).

⁹¹ See Ender's, speech in the Nationalrat on 12 5, 1930, Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates, 2nd session on Dec. 5, 1930, of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), vol. 1, 11–12Google Scholar; Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 122–25; Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2:925–26; and Huebmer, Dr. Otto Ender, 131–32.

⁹² Celesia's, Geisser and Morreale's, notes on a conversation with Major Pabst, appended to Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, 11 22, 1930, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 9, doc. no. 397, p. 571Google Scholar.

⁹³ Arlotta to Grandi, Budapest, Dec. 20, 1930, ibid., vol. 9, doc. no. 470, p. 693. See also Grandi to Auriti, Rome, Dec. 13, 1930, ibid., doc. no. 455, p. 674, and Kerekes, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie, 88–89.

⁹⁴ Grandi, to Arlotta, , Rome, 01 5, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 10, doc. no. 4, p. 8Google Scholar.

⁹⁵ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Feb. 14, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 68, pp. 114–15; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Mar. 12, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 127, pp. 196–97.

⁹⁶ Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates, 12th session on 02 6, 1931, of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), vol. 1, p. 278Google Scholar; Between Hitler and Mussolini: Memoirs of Ernst Rudiger Prince Starhemberg (New York, 1942) (hereafter cited as Starhemberg, Memoirs), 52Google Scholar; Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 179–82; Kerekes, Abenddämmerung einer Demokratie, 92–93; Wiltschegg, Die Heimwehr, 60–62; Edmondson, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 124–30.

⁹⁷ Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 130; Veiter, “Das 34^er,” 75

⁹⁸ Guariglia, to Grandi, , Rome, 02 13, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, vol. 10, doc. no. 65, p. 111Google Scholar. While Vaugoin was still chancellor, the administrative director of the Lower Austrian chamber of agriculture, Engelbert Dollfuβ, was named president of the federal railways. Soon thereafter Dollfuβ appointed Strafella, a Heimwehr man, as general director of the railways. See Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Dec. 29, 1930, ibid., vol. 9, doc. no. 481, p. 716; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Feb. 3, 1931, ibid., vol. 10, doc. no. 57, p. 97; and Grandi to Arlotta, Rome, Jan. 5, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 4, p. 8.

⁹⁹ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, May 7, 1931, ibid., vol. 10, doc. no. 254, pp. 382–83. See also Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Dec. 29, 1930, ibid., vol. 9, doc. no. 481, p. 717; Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Mar. 27, 1931, ibid., vol. 10, doc. no. 171, p. 270; and Grandi to Auriti, May 4, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 245, p. 373.

¹⁰⁰ Grandi's notes about his conference with Schober, Geneva, May 14, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 267, pp. 402–4. See also his notes on his conference with Schober at Geneva on May 20, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 277, pp. 426–28.

¹⁰¹ For a solid, lengthy discussion of the British role in dealing with the customs union project, see Beer, Siegfried, Der “unmoralische” Anschluβ. Britische Österreichpolitik zwischen Containment und Appeasement 1931–1934 (Vienna, 1988), 21–61Google Scholar.

¹⁰² Scheu, Der Weg ins ungewisse, 82–84; Kluge, Bauern, Agrarkrise und Volksernährung in der europäischen Zwischenkriegszeit, 343–44; Allgemeines Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), Ministerratsprotokoll no. 702 of June 16, 1931, carton 140, fol. 2.

¹⁰³ Huebmer, Dr. Otto Ender, 160.

¹⁰⁴ Ibid., 160–61; Scheu, Der Weg ins ungewisse, 84–85; Deutsch, Julius, Ein writer Weg. Lebenserinnerungen (Vienna, 1960), 179–80Google Scholar; Funder, Friedrich, Als Österreich den Sturm bestand. Aus der Ersten in die Zweite Republik, 3rd ed. (Vienna, 1957), 47–50Google Scholar; Leichter, Otto, Otto Bauer, Tragödie oder Triumph (Vienna, 1970), 272–74Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁵ As quoted in Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 134. Leser hints that Renner's resentment may have been a factor. Leser, Norbert, “Österreichs Demokratie am 19. Juni 1931. Das Koalitionsangebot Ignaz Seipels an Otto Bauer,” Christliche Demokratie 2, no. 1 (02 1984): 1934–1984Google Scholar. Konflikt und Versböhnung, 56.

¹⁰⁶ Scheu, Der Weg ins ungewisse, 84–85. See also Leser, “Österreichs Demokratie am 19. Juni 1931,” 52–53; Leser, Zwischen Reformismus und Bolschewismus, 450–52; Schausberger, Franz, Letzte Chance für die Demokratie. Die Bildung der Regierung Doltfuβ I im Mai 1932. Bruch der österreichischen Proporzdemokratie (Vienna, 1992), 30–31Google Scholar.

¹⁰⁷ Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 136. See also Veiter, “Das 34^erJahr,” 78; Leser, Zwischen Reformismus und Bolschewismus, 450–51; Leichter, Glanz und Ende der Ersten Republik, 130–31; Joseph Franz Desput, “Geschichtsbewuβtsein und Erste Republik,” in Österreich 1934–1984, ed. Desput, 50.

¹⁰⁸ Gertrude Enderle-Burcel, “Karl Buresch 1878 bis 1936,” in Die österreichischen Bundeskanzler, ed. Weissensteiner and Weinzierl, 179; Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2:949–50.

¹⁰⁹ Auriti reported to Grandi on September 16 that a member of General Hans von Seeckt's general staff had telephoned him the previous night that the Germans had given “Pfrimer moral and material encouragement. The reason is to be sought in Germany's diminished influence in Austria after recent events and in consequence of Schober's weakened position. The calculations of the Germans are as follows: If Pfrimer succeeds, people will come to power who will of necessity be obedient to Berlin; if he fails, his repression will reinforce … [Schober's] position.” I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 11, doc. no. 9, p. 4. See also Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 16, 1931, ibid, doc. no. 11, p. 13. It should also be noted that Starhemberg believed that the National Socialists were the real instigators of the putsch. Starhemberg, Memoirs, 54, 61.

¹¹⁰ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 10 5, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani 7th ser., vol. 11, doc. no. 40, p. 73Google Scholar. See also Winkler's, speech to the Nationalrat on Oct. 1, 1931, Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates, 47th session on 10 1, 1931, of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), vol. 4, pp. 1222–26Google Scholar; Winkler, Die Diktatur in Oesterreich, 36–37; Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 182; Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 184–86; Edmondson, The Heimwehr and Austrian Politics, 735–41; Lewis, Jill, Fascism and the Working Class in Austria, 1918–1934: The Failure of Labour in the First Republic (New York, 1991), 181–99Google Scholar; and Starhemberg, Memoirs, 52–54.

¹¹¹ It should be noted that the Social Democrats and Vice-Chancellor Schober, initially at least, “wanted the government to proceed with great vigor against all persons implicated in the Pfrimer movement.” The Christian Socials, however, were opposed to such a course. Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 09 16, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 11, doc. no. 10, p. 12Google Scholar.

¹¹² Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 183–84.

¹¹³ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 09 17, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 11, doc. no. 12, p. 15Google Scholar. See also Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 16, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 11, pp. 13–15, and Collotti, “Die Faschisierung des italienischen Staates,” in Der 4. März 1933, ed. Fröschl and Zoitl, 160.

¹¹⁴ Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2:963; Enderle-Burcel, “Karl Buresch 1878 bis 1938,” in Die österreichischen Bundeskanzler, ed. Weissensteiner and Weinzierl, 180; Kluge, Bauern, Agrarkrise und Volksernährung in der europäischen Zwischenkriegszeit, 346–47; Huebmer, Dr. Otto Ender, 166; Kaufmann, Fritz, Sozialdemokratie in Österreich. Idee und Geschichte einer Partei. Von 1889 bis zur Gegenwart (Vienna, 1978), 273Google Scholar.

¹¹⁵ Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2:963.

¹¹⁶ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 09 2, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 10, doc. no. 453, p. 718Google Scholar.

¹¹⁷ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Aug. 22, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 440, p. 698.

¹¹⁸ Gulick, Austria from Habsburg to Hitler, 2:963; Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 138–39.

¹¹⁹ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, 08 22, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 10, doc. no. 440, pp. 696–97Google Scholar; Grandi to Auriti, Geneva, Sept. 17, 1931, ibid., vol. 11, doc. no. 13, pp. 16–18.

¹²⁰ Ministerratsprotokoll no. 766 of Jan. 27, 1932, Allgemeines Verwaltungsarchiv (Vienna), carton 146, fol. 4. See also Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Feb. [19?], 1932, ibid., doc. no. 228, p. 402; Enderle-Burcel, “Karl Buresch 1878 bis 1936,” in Die österreichischen Bundeskanzler, ed. Weissen-steiner and Weinzierl, 180–82; Huebmer, Dr. Otto Ender, 166–67; Schumy Nachlaβ, pt. 3: “Heimwehr,” p. 78; and Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 142.

¹²¹ Kunschak, Österreich 1918–1934, 142–43. For Winkler's and Schuschnigg's appointments, see Buresch, to president of the Nationalrat, Jan. 29, 1932, Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates 72nd session on Feb. 4, 1932, of the 4th legislative period (1930–1932), vol. 4, p. 1714Google Scholar.

¹²² Ministerratsprotokoll no. 772 of Feb. 13, 1932, Allgemeines Verwaltungsarchiv(Vienna), carton 146, fols. 14–16.

¹²³ Schumy Nachlaβ, pt. 2: “Landbund,” 126a–27.

¹²⁴ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, , 09 2, 1931, I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 10, doc. no. 453, p. 718Google Scholar.

¹²⁵ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 29, 1931, ibid., vol. 11, doc. no. 33, pp. 52–53.

¹²⁶ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 5, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 40, pp. 73–74.

¹²⁷ Geisser Celesia to Grandi, Vienna, Nov. 5, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 67, p. 119.

¹²⁸ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 29, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 33, p. 51.

¹²⁹ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 5, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 40, p. 74.

¹³⁰ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Sept. 29, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 33, pp. 53–54. See also Grandi to Auriti, Rome, Oct. 23, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 56, p. 98.

¹³¹ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Oct. 5, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 40, p. 75.

¹³² Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Dec. 5, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 106, pp. 192–93.

¹³³ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Dec. 10, 1931, ibid., doc. no. 115, pp. 205–208; minutes of Mussolini's conference with Bethlen, Rome, Jan. 14, 1932, ibid., doc. no. 166, pp. 285–86.

¹³⁴ Auriti to Grandi, Vienna, Jan. 5, 1932, ibid., doc. no. 154, p. 274.

¹³⁵ Capasso, , the general consul at Munich, to Grandi, Munich, 12 2, 1931Google Scholar, ibid, doc. no. 102, p. 185. See also Pauley, Bruce, “A Case Study in Fascism: The Styrian Heimatschutz and Austrian National Socialism,” Austrian History Yearbook 12–13, pt. 1 (1966–1967): 267–68Google Scholar.

¹³⁶ Starhemberg, Memoirs, 80–84.

¹³⁷ Auriti, to Grandi, , Vienna, , 04 16, 1932, I documenti diplomatici italiani, 7th ser., vol. 12, doc. no. 17, pp. 17–18 (here, 18)Google Scholar. See also Ricciardi to Grandi, Innsbruck, Apr. 4, 1932, ibid., doc. no. 5, p. 3.

¹³⁸ See especially Renner, Nachgelassene Werke, vol. 2: Österreich von der ersten zur zweiten Republik, 79–80, 82; Kaufmann, Sozialdemokratie in Österreich, 233, 244; Pelinka, Anton, Karl Renner zur Einführung (Hamburg, 1989), 57–59Google Scholar; and Hannak, Karl Renner und seine Zeit, 495–501.

¹³⁹ Schneidemadl, Über Dollfuβ zu Hitler, 9–10.

¹⁴⁰ Among Otto Bauer's numerous writings expressing this opinion, see especially his “Klassenkampf und Ständeverfassung,” published in the Jan. 1934 issue of Der Kampf, as reprinted in Otto Bauer. Werkausgabe, ed. Pepper, 9:341–60.

¹⁴¹ See table 2 (union membership) and table 3 (strikes) in the appendix of Lewis, Fascism and the Working Class in Austria, 212–13; Otruba, Gustav, “‘Bauer’ und ‘Arbeiter’ in der Ersten Republik,” in Geschichte und Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Karl R. Stadler zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Botz, Gerhard, Hautmann, Hans, and Konrad, Helmut (Vienna, 1974), 91Google Scholar.

¹⁴² Vlcek, Christine, “Der republikanische Schutzbund in Österreich. Geschichte, Aufbau und Organisation” (Ph.D. diss., University of Vienna, 1971), 272, 274–92, 299–300Google Scholar; Duczynska, Workers in Arms, 108, 125–29.

¹⁴³ Memorandum sent from Vienna on Nov. 5, 1934, for the joint session of the , S.A.D. and , I.G.B. in Paris, 11 10, 1934, Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv (Vienna), Neue Politische Akten, carton 293, zu no. 37085/13, fol. 317Google Scholar.

¹⁴⁴ Vlcek, “Der republikanische Schutzbund,” 178–87; Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 119–23; Kaufmann, Sozialdemokratie in Österreich, 235–48; Botz, Gewalt in der Politik, 162–84, 236–37; Lewis, Fascism and the Working Class in Austria, 147.

¹⁴⁵ Gerhard Botz, “Die österreichische Nationalsozialisten,” in Österreich 1934–1984, ed. Desput, 205–6;Carsten, Fascist Movements in Austria, 189–201; Zernatto, Guido, Die Wahrheit in Österreich (New York, 1939), 63–65Google Scholar.

¹⁴⁶ See also Veiter, “Das 34^er Jahr,” 72–74.

¹⁴⁷ For the changes in the control of and the spirit of the Austrian army in the 1920s, see especially Jedlicka, Ludwig, Ein Heer im Schatten der Parteien. Die militär-politische Lage Österreichs 1918–1938 (Graz, 1955), 1–31, 56–85Google Scholar; Huemer, Peter, Sektionschef Robert Hecht und die Zerstörung der Demokratie in Österreich. Eine historisch-politische Studie (Munich, 1957), 24–112Google Scholar; Kollman, Theodor Körner, Militär und Politik, 157–77; Rauchensteiner, Manfried, “Bundesheer und Wehrverbände auf dem Weg zum Bürgerkrieg,” Christliche Demokratie 2, no. 1 (02 1984): 1934–1984Google Scholar. Konflikt und Versöhnung, 42–48; Luigi Mondini, “Die Wiederaufrüstung des Bundesstaates Österreichs” in Innsbruck-Venedig, ed. Wandruszka and Jedlicka, 273–83; and Feldmarschalleutnant Alfred Jansa, “Aus meinem Leben” (typewritten manuscript), Akt Nr. R101 in the Dokumentationsarchiv des österreichischen Widerstandes in Vienna.

¹⁴⁸ For an interesting evaluation of the prerequisites for successful democratic government by an Austrian conservative of that era, see Schmitz, “Biographische Memoiren”: (A) “Aus dem Leben eines politischen Gefangenen”; (B) “Im Konzentrationslager Dachau,” 14.

¹⁴⁹ For a harsh (and unfair) criticism of the failings of the Social Democrats, see especially Generalsekretariat der christlichsozialen Partei Österreichs, Regierung Dollfuβ —Vaterländische Front, Rednerskizze (Vienna, n.d.), 11–13.

¹⁵⁰ Schumy Nachlaβ, pt. 2: “Landbund,” 77; Winter, Ernst Karl, Christentum und Zivilisation (Vienna, 1936), 405Google Scholar.

¹⁵¹ See especially Kluge, Ulrich, Der österreichische Ständestaat 1934–1938. Entstehung und Scheitern (Vienna, 1984), 43–51Google Scholar.

¹⁵² On the control of party leaders over deputies, see MacDonald, The Republic of Austria, 51–52, and Zernatto, Die Wahrheit in Österreich, 85. For just a few examples of rhetorical fervor, see Renner's, speech in the Nationalrat on Dec. 5, 1930, Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates, 3rd session on Dec. 5, 1930, of the 4th legislative period (1930–1932), 1, 24Google Scholar; Wallisch's speech on Feb. 18, 1931, ibid., 18th session on Feb. 18, 1931, of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), vol. 1, 553–54; and the debates on July 14, 1931, ibid., 42nd session of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), vol. 4, 1085–87.

¹⁵³ See especially Wandruszka, “Österreich⋅ politische Struktur,” in Geschichte der Republik Österreich, ed. Benedikt, 480–81; Karl Dietrich Bracher, “ ‘Austrofaschismus’ und die Krise der Demokraten,” in Österreich 1934–1984, ed. Desput, 16–20; Desput, “Geschichtsbewußtsein und Erste Republik,” in ibid., 34–42; von Schuschnigg, Kurt, Dreimal Österreich, 2nd ed. (Vienna, 1937), 104–25Google Scholar; and Kluge, Der österreichische Ständestaat, 19–43.

¹⁵⁴ Veiter, “Das 34” Jahr,” 80–81.

¹⁵⁵ As quoted in Funder, Als Österreich den Sturm bestand, 55.

¹⁵⁶ Bauer, Otto, “Wir werden unsere bedrohte Freiheit verteidigen,” summary of three of Bauer's speeches printed in Arbeiterwille (Graz), 02. 10, 1932Google Scholar, as reprinted in Otto Bauer. Werkausgabe, ed. Pepper, 4:828.

¹⁵⁷ Kernbauer, Hans and Weber, Fritz, “Von der Inflation zur Depression. Österreichs Wirtschaft 1918–1934,” in “Austrofaschismus”. Beiträge üer Politik, Ökonomie und Kultur 1934–1938 ed. Tálos, Emmerich and Neugebauer, Wolfgang, 3rd ed. (Vienna, 1985), 23Google Scholar.

¹⁵⁸ Dieter Stiefel, “Vom Inflationsschock zum Arbeitslosenschock—Die Wirtschaftliche Situation in der Zwischenkriegszeit,” in Österreich 1934–1984, ed. Desput, 68–69.

¹⁵⁹ Haas, Karl, “Industrielle Interessenspolitik in Österreich zur Zeit der Weltwirtschaftskrise,” in Zeitschrift für Zeitgeschichte, 1978, 102Google Scholar.

¹⁶⁰ See tables 2 and 3 (production) and table 8 (exports and imports) in Fritz Weber, “Die Weltwirtschaftskrise und das Ende der Demokratie in Österreich,” in Der 4. März 1933, ed. Fröschl and Zoitl, 39–40, 42. During the same period industrial production fell 50 percent in the United States, 42 percent in Germany, 28 percent in Europe in general, and 36 percent for the world as a whole. See ibid., table 4, p. 40.

¹⁶¹ On employment and economic policies, see Fritz Bock, Das Schicksalsjahr 1934. Wie es dazu gekommen ist und seine Nachwirkungen (Vienna, n.d.), 23, and Stiefel, “Vom Inflationsschock zum Arbeitslosenschock,” 69. On unemployment subsidies, see Weber, “Die Weltwirtschaftskrise,” in Der 4. März 1933, ed. Fröschl and Zoitl, table 1, p. 38. For examples of the difficulty in procuring poor relief funds, see especially the speeches in the Nationalrat by Josef Resch on Oct. 22, 1931, by Norbert Horvatik and Anton Falle on Dec. 4, 1931, and by Pölzer, Johann on 12 11, 1931, Stenographische Protokolle über die Sitzungen des Nationalrates, 52nd session on Oct. 22, 59th session on Dec. 4, and 62nd session on Dec. 11, 1931, of the 4th legislative period (1930–32), 4, 1078, 1310–11, 1533, 1536–37Google Scholar.

¹⁶² Dr. Alexander Hrynschak, “Erinnerungen” (manuscript in the archive of the Institut für Zeitgeschichte in Vienna), 69.

¹⁶³ “Bauer spricht zu den steirischen Wählern,” Arbeiterwille (Graz), Apr. 20, 1932, as reprinted in Otto Bauer. Werkausgabe, ed. Pepper, 4:1009.

¹⁶⁴ Haurmann, Hans and Kropf, Rudolf, Die österreichische Arbeiterbewegung vom Vormärz bis 1945, 2nd ed. (Vienna, 1976), 161Google Scholar.

¹⁶⁵ See also Stiefel, “Vom Inflationsschock zum Arbeitslosenschock,” 69–71.

¹⁶⁶ Schneidemadl, Über Dollfuβ zu Hitler, 15–16.

¹⁶⁷ For details, see Mattl, Siegfried, “Krise und sozialer Protest. Die Widerstandshandlungen österreichischer Bauern gegen das behördliche Exekutionssystem in den Jahren 1931 bis 1933,” Zeitgeschichte 20, no. 1–2 (01–02 1993): 1–22Google Scholar.

¹⁶⁸ Schneidemadl, Über Dollfuβ zu Hitler, 16; Hrynschak, “Erinnerungen,” 68; Deutsch, Julius, The Civil War in Austria: A First-Hand Account from Eye-Witnesses and Participants, trans. Berenberg, David P. (Chicago, 1934), 9–10Google Scholar; Kun, Béla, Die Februarkämpfe in Österreich und ihre Lehren (Moscow, 1934), 10–11Google Scholar.

¹⁶⁹ For a more detailed analysis, see my article “The First Austrian Republic—Totalitarian, Fascist, Authoritarian, or What?” in Beiträge zur Zeitgeschichte. Festschrift Ludwig Jedlicka zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Neck, Rudolf and Wandruszka, Adam (Sankt Polten, 1976), 163–88Google Scholar; and Rath, R. John and Schum, Carolyn W., “The Dollfuss-Schuschnigg Regime: Fescist or Authoritarian?” in Who Were the Fascists? Social Roots of European Fascism, ed. Larsen, Stein Ugelvik, Hagtvet, Bernt, and Mykelbust, Jan Petter (Bergen, 1980), 249–56Google Scholar.

¹⁷⁰ von Schuschnigg, Kurt, The Brutal Takeover: The Austrian Ex-Chancellor's Account of the Anschluss of Austria by Hitler, trans. Barry, Richard (New York, 1971), 35Google Scholar.

¹⁷¹ See especially Germani, G., “Fascism and Class,” in The Nature of Fascism, ed. Woolf, S. J. (New York, 1968), 73–77Google Scholar; Trevor-Roper, H. R., “The Phenomenon of Fascism,” in European Fascism, ed. Woolf, S. J. (London, 1968), 20–24Google Scholar; Mosse, George L., “Introduction: The Genesis of Fascism,” Journal of Contemporary History 1, no.1 (1966): 14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Fascism and the Intellectuals,” in The Nature of Fascism, ed. Woolf, 216; Buchheim, Hans, Totalitarian Rule, Its Nature and Characteristics (Middletown, Conn., 1968), 23–24Google Scholar.

¹⁷² Hugh, Seton-Watson, “Fascism, Right and Left,” Journal of Contemporary History 1, no. 1 (1966): 183–84Google Scholar. For the whole argument on middle-class extremism, see especially Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics (Garden City, N.Y., 1963), 127–48, 176–78Google Scholar. See also Carsten, Francis L., Der Aufstieg des Faschismus in Europa (Frankfurt am Main, 1968), 273–81Google Scholar, and especially Erika, Weinzierl-Fischer, “Österreichs Katholiken und der Nationalsozialismus,” Wort und Wahrheit 18, no. 5 (1963): 418–19Google Scholar.

¹⁷³ T. W. Mason, “The Primacy of Politics—Politics and Economics in National Socialist Ger-many,” in The Nature of Fascism, ed. Woolf, 165–95; J. Solé-Tura, “The Political ‘Instrumentality’ of Fascism,” in ibid., 42–44.

¹⁷⁴ Nolte, Ernst, Three Faces of Fascism: Action Francaise, Italian Fascism, National Socialism, trans, from German by Vennewitz, Leila (New York, 1966), 20–21Google Scholar. The author's italics have been omitted.

¹⁷⁵ For good summaries of Nolte's six conditions, see Hanisch, Ernst, “Neuere Faschismustheorien,” Zeitgeschichte 1, no. 1 (1973): 19Google Scholar; and Clemenz, Manfred, Gesellschaftliche Ursprunge des Faschismus (Frankfurt am Main, 1972), 206Google Scholar. For a brief but thoughtful analysis of the effects of wartime experiences on the development of right-wing attitudes, see especially Adam Wandruszka, “Die Erbschaft von Krieg und Nachkrieg,” in Österreich 1927 bis 1938, 23.

¹⁷⁶ For good summaries of Kühnl's basic ideas, see Hanisch, “Neuere Faschismustheorien,” 21–22, and Clemenz, Gesellschaftliche Ursprünge des Faschismus, 206. For Clemenz's “generative dimensions,” see ibid., 213–32.