Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:35:33.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Zealand and the ACC: A noble experiment that failed?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Harry K. McNaughton  and
Kathryn M. McPherson
Harry K. McNaughton*
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Kathryn M. McPherson
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
*
Harry McNaughton Ph.D, Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

New Zealand's Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), which provides no-fault 24-hour cover for accidents, has been the subject of continuous debate since its inception in 1974. This article provides an up-to-date summary of changes to the legislation and how they have, or might, impact on providers and consumers of services. An attempt is made to look at the outcomes for ACC claimants in different broad categories. Although the ACC system has shown itself over time to be fairly resilient in the face of change, providers and consumers may not agree that the amount of change has delivered a better product for New Zealand.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 86 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACC (1999). Treatment Profiles. Wellington: ACC.Google Scholar
ACC (2000). Physiotherapy Treatment Profiles. Wellington: ACC.Google Scholar
ACC and the National Health Committee (1997). New Zealand Acute Low Back Pain Guide. Wellington.Google Scholar
Accident Compensation Corporation (2000). Annual Report. Wellington.Google Scholar
Accident Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation (1999). Injury Statistics. Wellington.Google Scholar
Dillane, J.B., Fry, J. & Kalton, G. (1966). Acute back syndrome — A study from general practice. BritishMedical Journal, 2, 82–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Dyson, R. (2000). Select Committee's recommendation heralds new era (New Zealand Parliament Accident Insurance Select Committee's Press Release: 29 02 2000).Google Scholar
Grinstone v ARCIC 3/9/99 (1999). District Court Proceedings. Palmerston North, New Zealand. 246/99.Google Scholar
Hadler, N.M. (1995). The disabling backache: An international perspective. Spine, 20, 640–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadler, N.M., (2000). Prognosis for people with back pain under a no-fault 24-hour-cover compensation scheme: Point of view. Spine, 25, 15.Google Scholar
Insurance Council of New Zealand (1995). A proposal for the alternative delivery of accident compensation benefits and services. Wellington: Insurance Council.Google Scholar
Loeser, J. D. & Volinn, E. (1991). Epidemiology of low back pain. Neurosurgical Clinics of North America, 2, 713–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loisel, P., Abenhaim, L., Durand, P., Esdaile, J.M., Suissa, S., Gosselin, L., Simard, R., Turcotte, J. & Lemaire, J. (1997). A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management'. Spine, 22, 2911–2918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGeorge, J. (2000). Physios say ACC is not listening. NZ Doctor, 30 08 2000, p. 5.Google Scholar
McNaughton, H. K., Sims, A. & Taylor, W. J. (2000). Prognosis for people with back pain under a no-fault 24-hour-cover compensation scheme. Spine, 25, 1254–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Commission of Inquiry (1967). Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand: Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry. Wellington: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Taylor, W., Simpson, R., Gow, D. & McNaughton, H. (In Press). Rehabilitation that works: vocational outcomes following rehabilitation for occupational musculoskeletal pain. New Zeland Medical Journal.Google Scholar
Van den Hoogen, H. J., Koes, B. W., Deville, W., van Eijk, J. T. & Bouter, L. M. (1997). The prognosis of low back pain in general practice. Spine, 22, 1515–1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, P. J., Main, C. J., Waddell, G., Gales, T.F. & Purcell-Jones, G. (1998). Medically certified work loss, recurrence and costs of wage compensation for back pain: a follow-up study of the working population of Jersey. British Journal of Rheumatology, 37, 82–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organisation (2000). The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems, improving performance. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar