Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:46:08.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Employment and Economic Outcomes for Deafened Adults with Cochlear Implants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Anthony Hogan ,
Chris Code ,
Alan Taylor  and
David Wilson
Anthony Hogan*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
Chris Code
Affiliation:
University of Sydney, Australia
Alan Taylor
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australia
David Wilson
Affiliation:
South Australian Health Commission, Adelaide, South Australia
*
School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences/C42, University of SydneyNSW 2006, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This paper examines employment issues concerning deafened adults, especially those with cochlear implants. The analysis shows that deafened people have fewer educational qualifications and are less likely to be in paid employment when compared with people without a hearing disability. In consequence, they report lower income levels. Conversely, respondents with cochlear implants reported higher levels of employment and income. In addition to disability, social factors such as age and sex may contribute to a person's socio-economic status. As such, rehabilitation interventions need to consider the person's social as well as auditory needs.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics 1993. Labor force status and educational attainment — February Catalogue No. 6205.0 Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics 1999. 1999 Yearbook Australia. Number 81. Catalogue 1301.0 Canberra.Google Scholar
Barnes, H., Thornton, P., Maynard Campbell, S. (1998) Disabled people and employment — A review of research and development work. The Policy Press. Great Britain.Google Scholar
Clark, G.M; Cowan, R. 1995 (eds.) International Cochlear Implant, Speech and Hearing Symposium — Melbourne 1994. Annals of Otology, Rhinohgy and Laryngology Supplement 166 Vol. 104, No. 9 (inclusive).Google Scholar
Finkelstein, V. 1980 Attitudes and disabled people World Rehabilitation Fund, New York.Google Scholar
Hogan, A.; Brown, K; Brown, M; Smith, B. 1989 Project Knock! Knock! A profile of the Deaf Community of New South Wales, Deaf Society of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
Hogan, A., 1998 Carving out a space to act — Acquired impairment and contested identity. Health Vol 2(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. 1996 Understanding disability — From theory to practice Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Summerfield, A.Q; Marshall, D.H. (1995) Cochlear implantation in the UK 1990–1994 Report by the MRC Institute of Hearing Research on the evaluation of the National Cochlear Implant Program MRC Institute of Hearing Research, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D; Xibin, S; Read, P; Walsh, P; Esterman, A. 1992 Hearing loss — An underestimated public health problem. Australian Journal of Public Health Vol. 16, 282–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winzer, M.A. 1993 Education, urbanization, and the Deaf Community: A case study of Toronto, 1870–1900 in Vickey Van Cleve, John (ed) Deaf history unveiled — Interpretations from the new scholarship Gallaudet University Press, Washington, 127–145.Google Scholar