Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:05:07.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Amendment to the Rehabilitation Skills Inventory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2015

Herbert C. Biggs
Herbert C. Biggs*
Affiliation:
Southern Cross University
*
School of Human Services, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour Education Campus, Coffs Harbour NSW 2457, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this investigation of rehabilitation professionals in Australasia, where the profession of rehabilitation counselling might be described as emerging, the appropriateness of the Rehabilitation Skills Inventory for use in Australasian settings was evaluated. This resulted in an amendment to the original instrument and the development of the RSI (Amended) instrument. The instrument validation is discussed and the four component solution described.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , 1999 , pp. 32 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Society of Rehabilitation Counsellors (1995). Core competencies for the profession of rehabilitation counselling. ASORC.Google Scholar
Biggs, H. C. (1996). A validation of the rehabilitation skills inventory in four Australasian rehabilitation organisations and its relationship with occupational measures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Biggs, H. C. & Flett, R.A. (1995). Rehabilitation counsellor competency studies: A review of praxis in a human service profession. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 1 (1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, H. C. & Voges, K. E. (1989). Strategies for the Development of a Professional Rehabilitation Service within the Accident Compensation Corporation. Rationale Pty Ltd, Queensland.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Vogelman, S. (1977). A comprehensive trial of the scree and kg criteria for determining the number of factors. Journal of Multivariate Behavioural Research, 12, 289–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cliff, N. (1988). The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and the reliability of components. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical development. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 754–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, S. (1995). Introduction to multivariate data analysis. In Breakwell, G. M., Hammond, S., and Fife-Brown, C., (Eds.) Research methods in psychology (pp. 360–385). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hershenson, D. B. (1989). Rehabilitation counselor education in two cultures: Australia and America. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund Inc.Google Scholar
Leahy, M. J., Shapson, P. R., & Wright, G. N. (1987a). Professional rehabilitation competency research: Project methodology. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 94–106.Google Scholar
Leahy, M. J., Shapson, P. R., & Wright, G. N. (1987b). Rehabilitation practitioners competencies by role and setting. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 119–130.Google Scholar
Muthard, J. E., & Salomone, P. R. (1969). The roles and functions of rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 13, 81–168.Google Scholar
Rubin, S. E., Matkin, R. E., Ashley, J., Beardsley, M. M., May, V. R., Onstott, K., & Puckett, F. D. (1984). Roles and functions of certified rehabilitation counsellors. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin, 45(1), 42–45.Google Scholar
Shrey, D. E. (1999). Development of occupational standards in disability management. National Institute of Disability Management and Research, Port Alberni: Canada. (Document under preparation).Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate Statistics. NY: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Wright, G. N. (1980). Total rehabilitation. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Wright, G. N., Leahy, M. J., & Shapson, P. R. (1987). Rehabilitation Skills Inventory: Importance of counselor competencies. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 107–118.Google Scholar
Wright, G. N., Leahy, M. J., & Riedesel, P. S. (1987). Rehabilitation education research: The importance and attainment of professional competencies. Rehabilitation Education, 1, 9–17.Google Scholar
Wright, G. N., Reagles, K. W., & Scorzelli, J. F. (1973). Measuring the effectiveness and variations of rehabilitation counselor education programs. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 4(2), 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwick, W. R. & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar