Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:20:35.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rodolfo Kusch's ‘Estar’ as Seen from the Systemic Perspective of Humberto Maturana as a way of ‘corazonar’ Coexistence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

Sergio Holas
Sergio Holas*
Affiliation:
Spanish Studies, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Sergio Holas, Spanish Studies, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, I further develop Rodolfo Kusch's concept of ‘negation’. I argue that it is an affirmative tool that enables us to sense and feel the other sides or domains of what we call reality and allows us to approach a plateau negated as a horizon of possibilities for conviviality and coexistence. Kusch's concept of negation brings forth an image of the emotions as being intimately interconnected to the values and ethos that form the basis of our behaviours. This paper also argues that Kush's concept of negation must be considered together with Kusch's development of ‘estar’ as a philosophical concept which underpins ‘América profunda’ ways of being in the world (or the multiverse). Finally, I propose that this ‘estar’ requires a ‘corazonar’ of our ways of bringing forth ourselves and our territories to life.

Keywords

Estarseremotionsdecolonisationnegation as affirmation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 47 , Special Issue 1: South-South Dialogues: Global Approaches to Decolonial Pedagogies , August 2018 , pp. 64 - 72
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alliez, E., & Goffrey, A. (Eds.) (2011). The Guattari effect. London, UK: Continnuum.Google Scholar
Borges, J.L. (1974). Book of imaginary beings. Middlesex, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1992). The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Guattari, F. (2011). Lines of flight. For another world of possibilities. Sydney, Australia: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Guerrero Arias, P. (2010). Corazonar. Una antropología comprometida con la vida. Quito, Ecuador: ABYA YALA, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana.Google Scholar
Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kusch, R. (2003). En sudamérica es preciso asumir lo indígena (pp. 309–317). Obras completas. Tomo IV. Rosario, Argentina: Fundación Ross.Google Scholar
Kusch, R. (2003). La emocionalidad y la lengua (pp. 363–366). Obras completas. Tomo IV. Rosario, Argentina: Fundación Ross.Google Scholar
Kusch, R. (2008). La negación en el pensamiento popular. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Los cuarenta.Google Scholar
Lenkensdorf, C. (2004). Conceptos tojolabales de filosofía y del alter mundo. México: Plaza & Janés.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. (1995). Ontología del conversar. La realidad: ¿objetiva o construida? I. Fundamentos biológicos de la realidad (pp. 19–36). Barcelona, Spain: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. (1999). Transformación en la convivencia. Santiago, Chile: DOLMEN.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. (2001). Our Genome does not determine us. Paper presented at American Society for Cybernetics Conference, May 27–29, Vancouver. http://www.asc-cybernetics.org/2001/RH-Maturana.htm. Accessed 6/11/2009.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. (2004). La objetividad. Un argumento para obligar. Santiago, Chile: J. C. Sáez.Google Scholar
Maturana, H., & Dávila, J. (2015). El árbol del vivir. Santiago, Chile: MVP Editores.Google Scholar
Maturana, H., & Dávila, X. (2008a). Habitar humano en seis ensayos de Biología-Cultural. Santiago, Chile: J. C. Sáez.Google Scholar
Maturana, H., & Gerden-Zoller, G. (1993). Amor y juego. Fundamentos olvidados de lo humano. Desde el patriarcado a la democracia. Santiago, Chile: J.C. Sáez.Google Scholar
Maturana, H., & Verden-Zöller, (2008b). The origin of humanness in the biology of love. Exeter, UK: Imprint- Academic.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs. Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petitmengin, C. (Ed.) (2009). Ten years of viewing from within. The legacy of Francisco Varela. Exeter, UK: Imprint- Academic.Google Scholar
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power, eurocentrism and Latin America (pp. 533–580). Neplanta: Views from the South. 1.3.Google Scholar
Rama, A. (1996). The lettered city. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, B. de (2014). Epistemologies of the South. Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Varela, F. (2000a). El reencantamiento de lo concreto. El fenómeno de la vida. Santiago, Chile: J. C. Sáez.Google Scholar
Varela, F. (2000b). Ningún lugar está aquí o está ahí. El fenómeno de la vida. Santiago, Chile: J. C. Sáez.Google Scholar
Watson, Irene (2012). Indigenous knowledges, the academy and the community. (2012) Duguid Memorial Lecture. http:www.unisa.edu.au/giving/Biennal-Duguid-Memorial-Lecture.asp. Accessed 30/12/2015.Google Scholar