Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:34:13.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mathematics Programs for Indigenous Students: Some Guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Ross Wilson*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Papua New Guinea University of Technology, Lae P.N.G.
Get access

Extract

This paper provides an overview for teachers who wish to develop a more appropriate mathematics program for their Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander students. It covers cultural, linguistic and environmental issues, as well as purely mathematical and methodological procedures. Current literature and reports from teachers indicate that many indigenous students are not performing well in mathematics. It is hoped that the suggestions contained in this article will lead to a more rewarding experience for both teacher and student.

It is generally agreed by teachers of Aboriginal and Islander students that most students are not performing at a satisfactory level. This conclusion has been documented by Bourke and Parkin, by the Curriculum and Research Branches of the Departments of Education in the Northern Territory and Western Australia, and by others, including Bishop, who wrote –

Experience has shown that many Aboriginal children do not manifest many [mathematical] outcomes at a level comparable with that obtained by European children.

The causes of this relatively unsatisfactory performance are complex, but may usually be traced to a combination of environmental, cultural and linguistic differences, as well as to unsuitable teaching programs and methods.

There is a noticeable lack of literature on the subject available to teachers, and it is hoped that the following comments will be useful in drawing up a mathematics program whose content and methodology will be more relevant and meaningful to the students.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bourke, S.F. and Parkin, B.: The performance of Aboriginal students. In Bourke, and Keeves, (Eds), Australian Studies in School Performance Vol. III, the Mastery of Literacy and Numeracy: Final Report. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1977.Google Scholar
2.Harris, P.J. and Ryan, B.: Teaching Mathematics in Aboriginal Schools. Paper presented at National Conference for Teachers of Aborigines, Darwin, 1978.Google Scholar
3.Department of Education, Western Australia, Curriculum and Research Branch: Mathematics and the Aboriginal Child, 1978.Google Scholar
4.Bishop, A.G.: Aboriginal students and mathematics: aims of the study of mathematics, Parts I and II. The Aboriginal Child at School, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1973, and Vol. 2 No. 2, 1974.Google Scholar
5.de Lacey, P.R.: Classificatory ability. In Kearney, G.E.et al., (Eds), The Psychology of Aboriginal Australians, John, Wiley, 1973, p. 61.Google Scholar
6.Beck, P.V. In Developing Education, Vol.6, No.4, 1979. Northern Territory Dept. of Education, p. 18.Google Scholar
7.Harris, P.J.: Measurement in Tribal Aboriginal Communities. Unpublished report of an independent project for the Degree of Bachelor of Special Education, Monash University, Melbourne, 1977.Google Scholar
8.Jones, J.: Quantitative Concepts, Vernacular and Education in Papua New Guinea. Education Research Unit, Report No.12, University of Papua New Guinea Bookshop, Port Moresby.Google Scholar
9.Beck, P.V. op.cit. p. 17.Google Scholar
10.Bishop, A.J., Spatial Abilities in a Papua New Guinea Context. Report No. 2, Mathematics Education Centre, The Papua New Guinea University of Technology, Lae, p. 18.Google Scholar
11.Gay, J. and Cole, M.: The New Mathematics and an Old Culture. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1967.Google Scholar
12.Harris, S.G.: Milingimbi Aboriginal Learning Contexts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, U.S.A., 1977 p. 85.Google Scholar
13.de Lacey, op. cit., p. 62.Google Scholar
14.Bishop, A.J.: Developing Spatial Abilities. Report No. 4, Mathematics Education Centre, The Papua New Guinea University of Technology, Lae, p. 26.Google Scholar
15.Murray, E.E.: Teaching Aboriginal and Islander Students English in Secondary Schools. Queensland Department of Education, Indigenous Education Branch, 1977.Google Scholar
16.Clark, A.R.et al.: Developing education guidance and counselling service for urban Aboriginal students. The Aboriginal Child at School, Vol.6, No.2, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Usiskin, S.P.: The future of fractions. Arithmetic Teacher, Vol. 26, No.5, January 1979, and Hall, L.T.: Readers Dialogue, Vol.26, No.7, March 1979, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, Virginia, U.S.A.Google Scholar
18.Wilson, R.S. (Ed.): Suggested Mathematics Program 1979, for Cape and Gulf Schools, Queensland. Queensland Dept. of Education, Indigenous Education Branch, Brisbane, 1979.Google Scholar
19.Harris, S.G.: Traditional Aboriginal Education Strategies and Their Possible Place in a Modern Bicultural School. Paper presented at National Conference for Teachers of Aborigines, Darwin, 1978.Google Scholar
20.Young, F.A. (Ed.): Continuity. Handbook for Teachers of Aboriginal and Islander Secondary Students in Community Schools. Queensland Department of Education, Brisbane, 1978.Google Scholar