Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:45:57.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language Negotiations Indigenous Students Navigate when Learning Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

Philemon Chigeza
Philemon Chigeza*
Affiliation:
School of Education, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, 4870, Australia
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports on implications of a research study with a group of 44 Indigenous middle school students learning the science concepts of energy and force. We found the concepts of energy and force need to be taught in English as we failed to find common comparable abstract concepts in the students' diverse Indigenous languages. Three categories of describing the concepts were identified: nine students who used scientific genre to explain and demonstrate the concepts (20%); 15 students who used limited scientific genre to explain and demonstrate the concepts in terms of direct action (35%); and 20 students who did not use scientific genre to either describe or display by direct action their knowledge of the concepts (45%).

Indigenous students learning school science navigate language negotiations before negotiating the language challenges in science learning. School science achievement is measured using Standard Australian English concept descriptors. These assessment instruments are designed to measure the student's negotiations from Standard Australian English into science. It is possible that these instruments do not adequately measure the Indigenous student's negotiations from their vernacular language into science. Developing a Creole science could empower Indigenous students learning school science to develop the capacity to successfully negotiate the language systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , 2008 , pp. 91 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Academy of Science. (2005). Primary connections: Plants in action. Canberra, ACT: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Meteorology (2007). Indigenous Weather Knowledge website. Retrieved 2 February, 2005, from http: www.bom.gov.au/iwk/.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (2003). Teaching and learning science: A guide to recent research and its applications. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Catholic Education Office, Diocese of Townsville. (2003). Right talk right place: A resource book for teachers of Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander students in North Queensland schools as a companion to Making the Jump. Townsville QLD: Catholic Education.Google Scholar
Chigeza, P. (2007). Indigenous students in school science. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 53(2), 10–15.Google Scholar
Chigeza, P., & Whitehouse, H. (2008, July). An investigation of Torres Strait Islander middle school students' descriptions of energy and force – research conducted in a wholly indigenous classroom. Paper presented at the 39th Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA) conference in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Fleer, M., & Hardy, T. (2001). Science for children: Developing a personal approach to teaching (2nd ed.). Sydney, NSW: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (2004). Research methods: A process of inquiry (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hackling, M. W. (2006). Primary connections: A new approach to primary science teaching and to teacher professional learning. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Hampton, E., Licona, M., & Izquierdo, E. (2005). Learning science in multilingual settings. In Huerta-Macias, A. (Ed.), Working with English language learners: A guide to successful practice (pp. 174–180). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt Publishers. Retrieved 9 November, 2005, from http://utminers.utep.edu/mlicona/Pubs/ana.htm.Google Scholar
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mellor, S., & Corrigan, M. (2004). The casefor change: A review of contemporary research on indigenous education outcomes (Australian Education Review). Melbourne, VIC: Australian Council of Educational Research.Google Scholar
Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224–240.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Program for International Students Assessment (PISA). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Queensland Indigenous Education Consultative Body. (2002). Standard Australian English and languages for Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
Queensland Government Department of Education, Training and the Arts. (2007, October). Towards a 10-year plan for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and skills in Queensland. Discussion paper for the Queensland Government Department of Education, Training and the Arts.Google Scholar
Sharp, N. (1993). Stars of Tangai: The Torres Strait Islanders. Canberra, ACT: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Valentine, P. (1996). Difficulties for learning science for second language learners. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of York, York.Google Scholar
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in school science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar