Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:59:14.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Young Adolescents' Perceptions of Environmental Issues: Implications for Environmental Education in Urban Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Arjen Evert-Jan Wals
Arjen Evert-Jan Wals*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Education, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite good intentions, many environmental education (EE) projects seem to fall short in realising ambitious learning goals such as “helping citizens become environmentally knowledgeable, skilled and dedicated people who are willing to work individually and collectively, toward achieving and/or maintaining a dynamic equilibrium between the quality of life and the quality of the environment.” (Harvey cited in Hungerford et al., 1980). Without always challenging the nature and content of these goals, many researchers and practitioners are trying to resolve this discrepancy between the theory and practice of EE. Some have tried to instrumentally structure EE content matter by using hierarchical levels of universal goals and objectives (e.g. Hungerford et al., 1980; Marcinkowski, 1990) whereas others who question the value or the status of universal goals and objectives, have put emphasis on contextual development of EE within the school community (e.g. Bull et al., 1988; Robottom, 1987). However, relatively little attention has been paid to the way young people come to make sense of their own environment through their everyday interactions with(in) the lifeworld.

For more than fifty years constructivist approaches to learning have suggested that the pre-instructional perceptions (also referred to as “mini-theories” and “misconceptions”) of the learner play a key role in successful learning or lack thereof (Ausubel, 1968; Driver and Oldham, 1986; Freyberg and Osborne, 1981; Gilbert and Watts, 1983; Hasweh, 1986; Novak and Gowin, 1984, Wals, 1987) Yet, unlike the English teacher who is very capable of determining at what “level” her students are, environmental educators have little understanding of students' perceptions of the environment and environmental issues, and the “mini-theories” to which they lead.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 8 , 1992 , pp. 45 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

Agar, M.H. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Ausubel, D.P. Educational Psychology: a Cognitive View. Holt, First edition, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
Beekman, A.J. Hand in hand mit Sacha. In: Lippitz, W. (Ed) Kind und Welt. Königstein, 1984.Google Scholar
Berg, M. and Medrich, E.A. Children in Four Neighborhoods: The Physical Environment and its Effect on Play and Play Patterns. Environment and Behavior, Vol 12, No 3, pp 220–248, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, M.J. Understanding of Pollution among 4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Students. Journal of Environmental Education. Vol 22, No 2, Winter, 1991, pp. 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, B. and Mohai, P. (Eds). Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse. Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bull, J., Cromwell, M., Cwikiel, W., Di Chiro, G., Guarino, J., Rathje, R., Stapp, W., Wals, A. E., and Youngquist, M. Education in Action: A Community Problem Solving Program for Schools. Thomson-Shore, Dexter, MI, 1988.Google Scholar
Bullard, , Solid Waste Sites and the Houston African-American Community, Journal of Sociological Inquiry, Vol 53, Spring, 1983.Google Scholar
Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Falmer Press, London, 1986.Google Scholar
Driver, R. and Oldham, V. A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, Vol 13, 1986, pp. 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, E.W. The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. Macmillan Publishing, New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 25th Edition, Continuum, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
Freyberg, P. and Osborne, R.J. Who Structures the Curriculum: Teacher or Learner? SET Research Information for Teachers, Vol 2, Item 6, 1984.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J.K. and Watts, D.M. Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, Vol 10, 1983, pp. 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago, 1967.Google Scholar
Hasweh, M.Z. Toward an Explanation of Conceptual Change. European Journal of Science Education, Vol 8, No 3, 1986, pp. 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungerford, H., Peyton, R.B. and Wilke, R.J. Goals for Curriculum Development in Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education, Vol 11, No 3, 1980, pp. 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmis, S. Action Research. International Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford, 1980.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. Action Research and Minority Problems. Journal of Social Issues, Vol 26, 1946, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
Lord, C., et al. Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 37, 1979, pp. 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcinkowski, T. The National Environmental Education Act; a renewal of commitment. Journal of Environmental Education. Vol 22, No 2, 1991, pp. 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margadant-van Arcken, M. Nature Experience of Eight to Twelve Year Old Children. Paper Presented at the Human Science Research Conference, Aarhus, Denmark, 18-22 08, 1989.Google Scholar
McCaul, , Discriminatory Air Pollution: If Poor, Don't Breathe. Environment Vol 18, No 2, 1976.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. and Stapp, W.B. Field Manual for Water Quality Monitoring; An Environmental Education Program for Schools. Fifth Edition, Thomson-Shore, Dexter, MI, 1991.Google Scholar
Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B. Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rejeski, D.W. Children Look at Nature: Environmental Perception and Education. Journal of Environmental Education, Vol 13, No 4, Summer, 1982, pp. 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robottom, I. Towards Inquiry-based Professional Development in Environmental Education. In: Robottom, I. (Ed) Environmental Education: Practice and Possibility, Deakin University Press, Victoria, Australia, 1987.Google Scholar
Roche, M. Phenomenology, Language and the Social Sciences. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1973.Google Scholar
Russell, D. Environmental Racism: Minority Communities and Their Battle Against Toxins. Amicus Journal, Vol 11, No 1, 1989.Google Scholar
Smith, F. A. Metaphor for Literacy: Creating Worlds or Shunting Information? In: Olson, D.R., Torrance, N. and Hildyard, A. (Eds), Literacy, Language, and Meaning; the nature and consequences of reading and writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.Google Scholar
Snyder, M. and Swann, W.B. Hypothesis-testing Processes in Social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 36, 1978, pp. 1202–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. Phenomenology in Psychology and Psychiatry: A Historical Introduction. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1972.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. Doing Phenomenology: Essays on and in Phenomenology. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Manen, M.J. An Exploration of Alternative Research Orientations in Social Education. Theory and Research in Social Education. Vol 3, No 1, 1975, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wals, A.E.J. The Educational Side of Environmental Education; with special consideration of systems thinking and constructivist approaches of learning. Wageningen: Department of Education and Teacher Training, Agricultural University of The Netherlands. Masters Thesis, 1987.Google Scholar
Wals, A.E.J., Beringer, A. and Stapp, W.B. Education in Action a Community Problem Solving Program for Schools. Journal for Environmental Education, Vol 21, No 4, 1990, pp. 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wals, A.E.J., Young Adolescents' Perceptions of Nature and Environmental Issues: Implications for Environmental Education in Urban Settings. University of Michigan, dissertation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, P. Invitation to Poison? Detroit Minorities and Toxic Fish Consumption from the Detroit River. In: Bryant, B. and Mohai, P., (Eds). Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards: A Time for Discourse. Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar