Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:07:43.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the Macro-context of Teaching Environmental Education: A Case Study from Queensland, 1989-1991

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

John Fien*
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University, Queensland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Any discussion of curriculum should consider the social setting, especially the relationship between schools and society and its influence on curriculum decisions…. Curriculum decisions take place in a complex social setting, through demands that are imposed by society and filter down to schools (Ornstein and Hunkins, 1988: 114).

Context is an important element in understanding the nature of the curriculum in any field and its goals. Thus, Cornbleth (1988: 89) describes curriculum as “an ongoing social activity shaped by various contextual influences within and beyond the classroom”. She argues that curriculum is a “contextualized social process” which:

… cannot be understood adequately … without attention to its setting or context. Curriculum is contextually shaped…. (C)urriculum emerges from the dynamic interaction of action, reflection and setting (Cornbleth, 1990: 6-7)

Similarly, Berlak and Berlak (1981: 24) write of the need to investigate teachers' decision making in terms of “the social, cultural and political forces and structures that are omnipresent in all social situations”. Sharp and Green (1975) argue that comprehensive explanations of teaching require an investigation of the “sociology of situations, their underlying structure and interconnections and the constraints and contingencies they impose” (p. 25).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

Alexander, D.E. From Citizen to Individual: A Study of Changing Influences on Citizenship Education in Queensland from 1966-1986, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Queensland, 1987.Google Scholar
Apple, M. Ideology and the Curriculum, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1979.Google Scholar
Artobolevskiy, S.Environmental problems in the USSR”, Geography Review, 4(4), 1991, pp. 1216.Google Scholar
Ashenden, D., Blackburn, J., Hannan, W., and White, D.Manifesto for a democratic curriculum”, The Australian Teacher, 7, 02, 1984, pp. 1320.Google Scholar
Australian Geography Teachers' Association (1988) Geography in Secondary Education, Australian Geography Teachers' Association, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Bates, R.Educational versus managerial evaluation in schools”. In Broadfoot, P. (eds.), Selection, Certification and Control, The Falmer Press, Lewes, 1984, pp. 127144.Google Scholar
Benson, J.K.Organizations: A dialectical view”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1977, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Berger, P. and Luckman, T. The Social Construction of Reality, Anchor Books, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Berlak, A. and Berlak, H. Dilemmas of Schooling: Teaching and Social Change, Methuen, London, 1981.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.On pedagogic discourse”. In Richardson, J.G. (eds.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, New York, 1986, pp. 205240.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.On pedagogic discourse (revised)”, CORE - Collected Original Resources in Education, 12(1), 1988, pp. 186.Google Scholar
Bingham, M. Interview with Quentin Dempster, 7.30 Report, ABC Television, 24 11, 1989.Google Scholar
Bjelke-Petersen, J.Why the government has rejected SEMP and Macos”, Goondiwindi Argus, 8 03, 1978, p. 2.Google Scholar
Board of Secondary School Studies Senior Syllabus in Geography - Semester Unit VI: “Man and the Environment”, Board of Secondary School Studies, Brisbane, 1973.Google Scholar
Board of Secondary School Studies Senior Syllabus in Geography, Board of Secondary School Studies, Brisbane, 1987.Google Scholar
Board of Senior Secondary School Studies Subject Unit Enrolment - Subject 24: Geography, Computer print-out tabled at State Review Panel for Geography, Brisbane, 27 05 1991.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. Schooling in Capitalist America, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1976.Google Scholar
Brown, P.Critical look in mirror for OECD”, The Sydney Morning Herald, 29 01, 1990, p. 9.Google Scholar
Butler, J. and Bartlett, L.School-based criterion referenced assessment and curriculum design: Some comments on the Queensland scene”. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 15, 1989, pp. 91107.Google Scholar
Campbell, W.J., Bassett, G.W., Campbell, E.M., Cotterell, J. L., Evans, G.T. and Grassie, M.C. Some Consequences of the Radford Scheme for Schools, Teachers and Students in Queensland, Department of Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 1975.Google Scholar
Carden, M. A Political History of Queensland: An Environmental Perspective, Unpublished paper, Division of Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University, mimeo, 1990.Google Scholar
Coaldrake, P.Overview”. In Prasser, A., Wear, R. and Nethercote, J., (eds.), Corruption and Reform: The Fitzgerald Vision, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1988, pp. 157159.Google Scholar
Coaldrake, P. Working the System: Government in Queensland, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1989.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. and Harrison, M. Curriculum Action Project: A Report on Curriculum Decision-Making In Australian Secondary Schools, Curriculum Action Project, Macquarie University, Sydney, 1982.Google Scholar
Cornbleth, C.Curriculum in and out of context”, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3, (2), 1988, pp. 8596.Google Scholar
Cornbleth, C. Curriculum in Context, The Falmer Press, Lewes, 1990.Google Scholar
Corson, W.H., (eds.) The Global Ecology Handbook: What You Can Do About The Environmental Crisis, The Global Tomorrow Coalition, Beacon Press, Boston, 1990.Google Scholar
Crough, G., Wheelwright, T. and Wiltshire, T. Australia and World Capitalism, Penguin, Ringwood, 1981.Google Scholar
Curriculum Development Services. Environmental Education: A Curriculum Guide for Queensland Schools, 06 1990, Department of Education, Brisbane, 1991.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. and Brown, L. Environmental Attitudes of the Queensland Population in 1990, Institute of Applied Environmental Research, Griffith University, Brisbane, 1990.Google Scholar
Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, Australia. State of the Environment in Australia 1985, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1986.Google Scholar
Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, Australia. State of the Environment in Australia 1986, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1987.Google Scholar
Department of Education, Queensland. Environmental Education in Departmental Schools in Queensland, Education Office Gazette, 78(7), 1976.Google Scholar
Department of Education, Queensland. Environmental Education in Queensland State Schools, Policy Statement No 20, Supplement to Education Office Gazette, 100(1), 1988.Google Scholar
Dickie, P. The Road to Fitzgerald, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1988.Google Scholar
Donaghue, T.J. Implementation of Environmental Education in the Queensland Secondary School Curriculum: A Case Study of School Level Program Development, Unpublished Master of Science Dissertation, Griffith University, Brisbane, 1990.Google Scholar
Dorman, J.The control of teachers in Queensland secondary schools”. In Bates, R., Prunty, J. and Watkins, P. (eds.), Working Papers in the Theory and Practice of Educational Administration, School of Education, Deakin University, 1984, pp. 4358.Google Scholar
Dudley, R. Guidelines for the Development of Syllabuses for Board Subjects, Board of Secondary School Studies, Brisbane, 1986.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and Cotterell, J.Curriculum development and curriculum practices”. In Campbell, J. et al, (eds.), Some Consequences of the Radford Scheme for Schools, Teachers and Students in Queensland, Report No. 17, Australian Association for Research and Development in Education, 1976, pp. 204224.Google Scholar
Fieman-Nemser, S. and Floden, R.E.The cultures of teaching”. In Wittrock, M.C. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd (eds.), Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 1986, pp. 505526.Google Scholar
Fien, J.F.The Australian environment: Visions, imperatives and classroom reality”, Geographical Education, 5(4), 1988, pp. 2027.Google Scholar
Fien, J. F. Towards a Red-Green Future: Critical Curriculum Theorising and Environmental Education, Deakin University Press, Geelong 1992 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Fien, J.F. and Gerber, R.V., (eds.) Teaching Geography for a Better World, Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 1988.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, G. Report of a Commission of Inquiry Pursuant to Orders in Council (The Fitzgerald Report), Queensland Government Printer, Brisbane, 1989.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, R. From 1915 to the Early 1980s: A History of Queensland, Volume 2, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1984.Google Scholar
Foster, W. Loose Coupling Revisited: A Critical Review of Weick's Contribution to Educational Administration, Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1983.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, Macmillan, London, 1979.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Giroux, H.A. Ideology, Culture and the Process of Schooling, The Falmer Press, Lewes, 1981.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A.W. The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class, Seabury Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
Graves, N. J. Geography In Education, Heinemann, London, 1975.Google Scholar
Greenall, A. Environmental Education for Schools: Or How to Catch Environmental Education, Curriculum Development Centre and Department of Science and the Environment, Canberra, 1980.Google Scholar
Greenall, A.A political history of environmental education in Australia: Snakes and ladders”. In Robottom, I.M. (eds.), Environmental Education: Practice and Possibility, Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1987, pp. 321.Google Scholar
Greenall-Gough, A. Investigating a Socially Transformative Curriculum through Environmental Education. Unpublished paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, 1989.Google Scholar
Halsey, J.Wanted: An environmentally driven and educationally supported approach to economics”, Unicorn, 15(3), 1989, pp. 148150.Google Scholar
Hart, C. Values Enquiry in Practice, Occasional Paper No. 3, Geography 1619 Curriculum Project, University of London Institute of Education, 1982.Google Scholar
Hawke, R.J.L. Our Country, Our Future, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1989.Google Scholar
Heathcote, R.L.The visions of Australia”. In Rapoport, A. (eds.), Australia as a Human Setting, Angus and Robertson, Sydney, 1972, pp. 7798.Google Scholar
Henry, D. Public Issue Dispute Resolution, Unpublished address to National Conference on Public Issue Dispute Resolution, Brisbane, 1991.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. The “politics of school geography”. In Huckle, J. (eds.), Geographical Education: Reflection and Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983, pp. 143154.Google Scholar
Huckle, J.Geography and schooling”. In Johnston, R.J. (eds.), The Future of Geography, Methuen, London, 1985, pp. 291306.Google Scholar
Huckle, J.Geographical education for environmental citizenship”, Geographical Education, 5(2), 1986, pp. 1320.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. What We Consume: The Teacher' Handbook, World Wide Fund For Nature (UK) and Richmond Publishing, Goldaming, Surrey, 1988.Google Scholar
Huckle, J.Education for sustainability: Assessing pathways to the future”, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 1991, pp. 4969.Google Scholar
IUCN, UNEP and WWF Caring for the World: A Strategy for Sustainability, 2nd draft, IUCN, Gland, 1990.Google Scholar
Keating, P. (1990) Interview with P. Lynham, 7.30 Report, ABC Television, 3 02, 1990.Google Scholar
Kirk, D. and Smith, S.How objective are ROSBA objectives: A critique of objectivism in curriculum design”, Curriculum Perspectives, 6(2), 1986, pp. 3236.Google Scholar
Komarov, B. Environmental Destruction in the Soviet Union, Pluto Press, London, 1978.Google Scholar
Lingard, R.Accountability and control: A sociocultural account of secondary school assessment in Queensland”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(2), 1990, pp. 171188.Google Scholar
Maher, M.Censorship, consensus and challenge: Environmental education in schools in Australia”, Social Alternatives, 5(2), 1985, pp. 2326.Google Scholar
Maher, M.Environmental education: What are we fighting for?”, Geographical Education, 5(2), 1986, pp. 2125.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, A. In Their Own Right: The Rise to Power of Joh's Nationals, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1984.Google Scholar
Naish, M., Rawling, E., and Hart, C. Geography 16-19: The Contribution of a Curriculum Project to 16-19 Education, Longman, Harlow, 1987.Google Scholar
Oliphant, J. and Morley, P.Goss backs zinc giant”, The Courier Mail, 7 03, 1991, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ornstein, A.C. and Hunkins, F.P. Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Issues, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1988 Google Scholar
Pirages, D.C.Technology, ecology and transformations in the global political economy. In Pirages, D. C. and Sylvester, C. (eds.), Transformation in the Global Political Economy, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1990, pp. 121.Google Scholar
Pitman, J. and Dudley, R. The Queensland Senior Secondary School Curriculum 1981-1990. A Decade of Change, Unpublished paper presented at joint conference of Queensland Ministerial Consultative Council on Curriculum and Australian Curriculum Studies Association, Brisbane, 1990.Google Scholar
Pollard, A.A model of classroom coping strategies”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(1), 1982, pp. 1937.Google Scholar
Preston, N.The Fitzgerald report and education: A case study of ideology, the State and education policy”, Unicorn, 16(1), 1989, pp. 814.Google Scholar
Queensland Teachers' Union. “A chronology of intervention”, QTU Professional Magazine, 4(1), 1986, pp. 20.Google Scholar
Rostow, W.W. The World Economy: History and Prospect, Macmillan, London, 1978.Google Scholar
Scott, E., Berkeley, G.F., Schuntner, L.T., Walker, R.F. and Winkle, L. (1978) A Review of School-Based Assessment in Queensland. Report commissioned by the Board of Secondary School Studies, Brisbane, 1978.Google Scholar
Select Committee on Education. The Aims of Our Schools and the Future of Social Education, Interim Report of the Select Committee on Education in Queensland, Section 4. Reprinted as: Social education and the teacher. In D'Urso, S. and Smith, R. A. (eds.) Changes, Issues and Processes in Australian Education, 2nd edition, University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, 1981, pp. 9196.Google Scholar
Sharp, R. and Green, A. Education and Social Control, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1975.Google Scholar
Simmons, I.G.Ingredients of a green geography”, Geography, 75(2), 1990, pp. 98105.Google Scholar
Simson, R.Man and the Environment: The evaluation of a semester course”, Geographical Education, 2(4), 1974, pp. 487499.Google Scholar
Smil, V. The Bad Earth: Environmental Degradation in China, Zed Press, London, 1984.Google Scholar
Smith, R.A.Controversial issues and the Parliamentary Select Committee”. In D'Urso, S. and Smith, R.A. (eds.), Changes, Issues and Processes in Australian Education, 2nd edition, University of Queensland Press, St Lucia, 1981, pp. 97103.Google Scholar
Spork, H. The Education Practices, Professional Preparation, Attitudes and Concerns of State Primary Classroom Teachers in Brisbane North Region, Queensland, Regarding Environmental Education. Unpublished Master of Environmental and Community Health dissertation, Griffith University, Brisbane, 1990.Google Scholar
Stoddard, D.R.To claim the higher ground: Geography for the end of the century”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, N.S., 12, 1987, pp. 327336.Google Scholar
Sturman, A.The application of organizational models to the schools”, The Journal of Educational Administration, 24(2), 1986, pp. 187212.Google Scholar
Sturman, A. Decentralisation and the Curriculum: Effects of the Revolution of Curriculum Decision Making in Australia, ACER Research Monograph No. 35, Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, 1989.Google Scholar
Taylor, P.J.The world-systems project”. In Johnston, R.J. and Taylor, P.J., (eds.), A World in Crisis: Geographical Perspectives, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986, pp. 269288.Google Scholar
Timberlake, L. Africa in Crisis: The Causes, the Cures of Environmental Bankruptcy, Earthscan, London, 1985.Google Scholar
UNEP The Public and the Environment, UNEP, Nairobi, 1988.Google Scholar
UNESCO-UNEPThe Belgrade Charter: A global framework for environmental education”, Connect, 1(1), 1976, pp. 12.Google Scholar
UNESCO-UNEP (1978) “The Tbilisi Declaration”, Connect, III(1), 1978, pp. 18.Google Scholar
Walker, R. Doing Research: A Handbook for Teachers, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, I. The Politics of the World - Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
Watkins, P. Agency and Structure: Dialetics in the Administration of Education, ESA844 Administrative Context of Schooling, Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1985.Google Scholar
Watkins, P.Leadership, power and symbols in educational administration”. In Smyth, J. (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership, The Falmer Press, Lewes, 1989, pp. 937.Google Scholar
Weick, K.Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems”, Administration Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1976, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Williams, L. Personal communication (interview), 24 03 1990.Google Scholar
Woods, P. Inside Schools: Ethnography in Educational Research, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1986.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar