Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:55:03.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sustaining Development of Environmental Education in National Political and Curriculum Priorities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Annette Greenall Gough
Annette Greenall Gough*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Deakin University, Victoria
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between national economic and political priorities and environmental education policy formulation and curriculum strategies. This relationship will be placed in the historical context of developments in environmental education in Australia from 1970 until the present and will be analysed in terms of the ideological and pedagogical stances implicit, and explicit, in the developments during this period. I will argue that the emphasis throughout the period has been to sustain the development of environmental education without any questioning of why, what and how this development should occur.

‘Sustainable development’ has become a slogan for governments, industry and conservation groups in recent times. It was the subtitle for the World Conservation Strategy (IUCN 1980) and the National Conservation Strategy for Australia (DHAE 1984) - living resource conservation for sustainable development - and was popularised in the report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, more commonly known as the Brundtland Report or Our Common Future (WCED 1987). The definition of sustainable development given in the World Conservation Strategy (IUCN 1980: section 1.3) and repeated in the National Conservation Strategy for Australia (DHAE 1984: 12) is as follows:

Development is…the modification of the biosphere and the application of human, financial, living and non-living resources to satisfy human needs and improve the quality of human life. For development to be sustainable it must take account of social and ecological factors, as well as economic ones; of the living and nonliving resource base; and of the long term as well as the short term advantages and disadvantages of alternative actions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 8 , 1992 , pp. 115 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

Abzug, B. Women want an equal say in UNCED. Network '92 9, 1991, p. 2.Google Scholar
Australia. Department of Home Affairs and Environment (DHAE) A National Conservation Strategy for Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1990. (Developed at a conference in 06 1983)Google Scholar
Australia. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) Ecologically Sustainable Development. A Commonwealth Discussion Paper. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1990.Google Scholar
Brown, V. and Switzer, M. Engendering the Debate: Women and Ecologically Sustainable Development. Office of the Status of Women, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra, 1991a.Google Scholar
Brown, V. and Switzer, M. Where have all the women gone? The role of gender in sustainable development. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University. Mimeo, Canberra, 1991b.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. Collins, London, 1951.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, D. and Robottom, I. Heath Education and Environmental Education: Toward a Shared Agenda and a Shared Discourse. Unicorn 16(2) 1990, pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
Commission for the Future Personal Action Guide for the Earth. Australian Government Publishing Service, Melbourne, 1989.Google Scholar
Dargavel, J. and Brown, V. Depopulating the environment. Australian Society 10(9), 1991, pp. 24–25.Google Scholar
Di Chiro, G. Applying a feminist critique to environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 3(1), 1987a, pp. 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Chiro, G. Environmental Education and the question of gender: A feminist critique. In Robottom, I. (ed) Environmental education: practice and possibility. Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1987b, pp. 23–48.Google Scholar
Disinger, J.F. Environmental education for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Education 21(4), 1990, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. and Hailes, J. The Green Consumer Guide. Penguin, Ringwood, 1989.Google Scholar
Frankel, O. Chairman's Remarks. In Evans, J. and Boyden, S. (eds) Education and the Environmental Crisis. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 1970.Google Scholar
Gell, R. and Beeby, R. It's easy being green. McCulloch, Carlton, 1989.Google Scholar
Giroux, H.A. Theory and Resistance in Education. Bergin and Garvey, South Hadley, Mass, 1983.Google Scholar
Greenall, A. Environmental Education in Australia: Phenomenon of the Seventies (A Case Study in National Curriculum Development). Occasional Paper No.7. Curriculum Development Centre, Canberra, 1981.Google Scholar
Greenall, A. A new beginning for environmental education in Australia. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 1(2), 1985, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
Greenall, A. A political history of environmental education in Australia: Snakes and ladders. In Robottom, I. (ed) Environmental education: practice and possibility. Deakin University Press, Geelong, 1987, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Greenall Gough, A. Red and Green: Two Case Studies in Learning through Political Action. Curriculum Perspectives 10(2) 1990, pp. 60–65.Google Scholar
Greenall Gough, A. Environmental education: recycling for reproduction or empowerment for transformation? Paper presented at Rainbow Alliance Autumn Sessions Seminar, 14 05, 1991a.Google Scholar
Greenall Gough, A. Recycling the flavour of the month: environmental education on its third time around. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 7, 1991b, pp. 92–98.Google Scholar
Greene, D. Beyond Compost. Conserve, 02: 4–5, 1991.Google Scholar
Hart, P. Environmental Education in Canada: Contemporary Issues and Future Possibilities. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 6, 1990, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. Ten red questions to ask green teachers. Green Teacher 1(2) 1986, pp. 11–15.Google Scholar
Huckle, J. Education for sustainability: assessing pathways to the future. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 7, 1991, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Hungerford, Harold R. and Volk, Trudi L. Changing Learner Behavior Through Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education 21(3) 1990, pp. 8–21.Google Scholar
International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) World Conservation Strategy. IUCN, Gland, 1980.Google Scholar
Jickling, B. Why I Don't Want My Children To Be Educated For Sustainable Development. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Conference of the North American Association for Environmental Education, Saint Paul, Minnesota, 27 09-2 October, 1991.Google Scholar
Langmore, J. Opening Address. In Department of Arts, Heritage and Environment, Environmental Education - Past, Present and Future. Proceedings of the Third National Environmental Education Seminar and Workshops. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service,Canberra, 1987, pp.7–10.Google Scholar
Margaret Gee's Green Buyer's Guide, S&W Information Guides, Melbourne, 1989.Google Scholar
101 ways to protect our environment Ministry for Planning and Environment and the Victorian Association for Environmental Education, Melbourne, 1989.Google Scholar
Robottom, I. Environmental Education: reconstructing the curriculum for social responsibility. New Education XII(1), 1990.Google Scholar
Sibly, J. The 1990 AAEE Conference: a new status envisaged for environmental education. ozEEnews 44, 190, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Tesh, Sylvia Noble Hidden Arguments: Political ideology and Disease Prevention Policy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, 1988.Google Scholar
Unesco Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Tbilisi USSR, 14-26 October 1987- Final Report. Unesco, Paris, 1978.Google Scholar
Unesco Environmental Education in the light of the Tbilisi Conference. Unesco, Paris, 1980.Google Scholar
Unesco-UNEP International strategy for action in the field of environmental education and training for the 1990s. Unesco and UNEP, Paris and Nairobi, 1988.Google Scholar
Victoria. Ministry of Education Ministerial Policy, Environmental Education. Ministry of Education, Melbourne, 1990.Google Scholar
Victorian Environmental Education Council Educating for our environment: towards an environmental education strategy for Victoria. A Discussion Paper. Victorian Environmental Education Council, Melbourne, 1991.Google Scholar
White, S. Green is Good: the new environmentalism - planning for the nineties. Clemenger, Melbourne, 1990.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar