Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:30:39.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Report Fit for Children? A Critical Examination of the Work of the UN General Assembly's Special Session on Children, May 2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Justin Dillon
Affiliation:
King's College London, UK
Stephen Gough
Affiliation:
University of Bath, UK
William Scott
Affiliation:
Unviersity of Bath, UK
Kelly Teamey
Affiliation:
King's College London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From 8-10 May 2002, the United Nations General Assembly met in a Special Session on Children. Representatives from more than 180 countries agreed on 21 new goals in the areas of education, health, combating AIDS and protecting children against abuse, exploitation and violence (Reuters 2002), The Assembly set six new targets aimed at meeting the goal of ‘quality basic education for all children’. In this paper we critically examine the strategies that the UN identified to ensure that the targets are met, in the light of our experiences researching and writing a report for the UK Department for International Development (DFID) on mainstreaming environmental education.

At the Special Session, held in New York, children and heads of state evaluated progress towards achieving the 27 goals set at the 1990 World Summit for Children (UNICEF 2002a). The Special Session on Children was preceded by a three-day Children's Forum ‘for those most directly affected by the decisions made at the conference’ (UNICEF 2002b). As well as 350 children from more than 150 countries (reported elsewhere as ‘376 children and young adults from 115 countries’ (MacCentral 2002) there were ‘2,000 representatives of more than 800 non-governmental organizations (NGOs), including many of UNICEF's partners in the field’ (UNICEF 2002b). The claim that the Forum was attended by ‘those most directly affected by the decisions’ is at best pious hope and at worst pure spin, but the size and scale of the event merits consideration by those working for and with children around the world.

Type
Viewpoints
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

References

Dillon, J., Hindson, J., Gough, S., Scott, W. & Teamey, K. 2001, Mainstreaming Environmental Education in DFID Programmes, Shrewsbury, Field Studies Council.Google Scholar
Dillon, J., Gough, S., Scott, W. A. H. & Teamey, K. 2002, ‘Mainstreaming environmental education: reflections on contract research”, unpublished paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LO, 04 2.Google Scholar
Gardner, G. 2001, ‘Accelerating the shift to sustainability’ in Brown, L.et al. (eds), State of the World 2001, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
Hoyle, E. 2001, ‘Teaching, prestige, status and esteem’, Educational Management and Administration, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 139152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCentral 2002, iBooks involved in historic UN children's session, http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0205/17.un.php accessed on 19 May 2002.Google Scholar
Reuters 2002, UN children's forum concludes after bitter debate, http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/436216 accessed on 19 May 2002.Google Scholar
UN Foundation 2002, UN Special Session on Children, http://www.unfoundation.org/spotlight/index.asp accessed on 19th May 2002.Google Scholar
UNICEF 2002a, A promise to children, http://www.unicef.org/wsc/Google Scholar
UNICEF 2002b, A world fit for children: UN special session adopts new goals, http://www.unicefusa.org/ssc/ accessed on 19 May 2002.Google Scholar
UNICEF 2002c, A world fit for children: Advance unedited report 24 May 2002, http://www.unicef.org/specialsession/Google Scholar