Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:13:08.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land ethics — who needs them?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

B. Roberts
B. Roberts*
Affiliation:
Toowoomba Erosion Awareness Movement, Darling Downs Institute, Toowoomba. Qld. 4350
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Land degradation through erosion and salinity is Australia's most urgent environmental problem.

Despite the extent and rate of land deterioration, it is not a political issue and has no lobby. Solution to the problem lies in education, incentives and regulations, each in their appropriate role.

Basically Australia needs a fundamental change in attitude toward the land based on land ethics. Fifteen specific concepts are recommended for teaching in schools to encourage a sustainable ecological basis for rural production.

The author challenges environmental educators to recognize and pursue the need for land ethics as the cornerstone of Australia's soil conservation campaign and points out that, without a fundamental change of heart leading to greater respect and humility toward the land, neither laws or finances will reverse the present deteriorating situation on the land.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 8 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

Anderson, E.W. 1983. Viewpoint: Building a Stewardship Ethic. Rangelands Vol. 5 (6), 271–273.Google Scholar
Anon. 1981. Conference Resolutions, 3rd National Soil Conservation Conference, Tamworth.Google Scholar
Anon. 1978. A Basis for Soil Conservation Policy in Australia: Dept. Housing and Environment, Canberra.Google Scholar
Ashworth, G. 1982. A New Land Use Ethic for the U.S. In: Ebenreck ibid.Google Scholar
Bolton, G. 1981. Spoils and Spoilers. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.Google Scholar
Booysen, P. de V. 1980. The Importance of the Ecological View of Agriculture. Proc. Grassl'd Soc. South Africa. 15: 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromfield, L. 1947. Malabar Farm. In: Pechey ibid.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, G.C. 1984. Rathburnie Environmental Estate. In: Plant a Tree: a Working Guide to the Greening of Southeast Queensland. Greening Australia Publication, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Cook, E. 1970. Environmental Ethics and Hope. In: Living in the Environment, Miller, G. Tyler, Wads worth Publ. Co., Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
Davis, A.H. 1934. The Green Grey Homestead. Sydney.Google Scholar
Downes, R.G. 1972. The Ecology and Prevention of Erosion. In: Biogeography and Ecology in Australia, Ed. Keast, A., Junk Publ., The Hague.Google Scholar
Dubos, R. 1973. A God Within. Angus & Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar
Ebenreck, S. 1983. A Partnership Farmland Ethic. Environmental Ethics Vol. 5: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, R. 1978. Ethics and Conservation. Habitat, Aus. Cons. Found. 05.Google Scholar
Glacken, C.J. 1970. Man Against Nature: an Outmoded Concept. In: The Environmental Crisis, Ed. Helfrich, H.W.. Yale Uni. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1976. The Biggest Job of All for the Conservationists. The Bulletin, 11 13.Google Scholar
Kovda, V.A. 1977. Soil Loss: An Overview. Agro-Ecosystems Vol. 3: 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. 1953. The Round River. In: Journals of Aldo Lepold. Ed. Leopold, L.B.. Oxford Uni. Press N.Y.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. 1966. A Sand County Almanac, Oxford U. Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Marsh, G.P. 1864. The Earth as Modified by Human Action. Scribners Co., N.Y.Google Scholar
McHarg, J.L. 1969. Design with Nature. Gold City Publ. N.Y.Google Scholar
Osborne, R.C. and Rose, C.W. 1981. Retrospect and Prospect: Degradation of Australia's Land Resources in Response to World Food Needs. Unpublished manuscript, Griffith University, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Passmore, J. 1974. Man's Responsibility for Nature. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Pechey, W.R. 1980. The Essential Features of Successful Farming: Permanence, Health and Beauty. Presidential Address. Trop. Grassl. Vol. 14 (1): 2–5.Google Scholar
Roberts, B.R. 1974. Ecological Education — A Challenge to Extension. J.S. Afr. Inst. Agric. Ext. 3: 5–7.Google Scholar
Roberts, B.R. 1982. Progress With Rehabilitation of Mined Land in Queensland. Chamber of Mines Seminar, Broadbeach, Queensland.Google Scholar
Roberts, B.R. 1983. Soil Conservation Studybook, External Studies Dept., D.D.I.A.E., Toowoomba, 242 pp.Google Scholar
Routley, R. & V., 1975. The Fight for the Forests. Falcon Press, Canberra.Google Scholar
Sampson, N. 1982. Sustaining the Land Ethic in Agricultural Education. J. Nat. Ass. Colleges & Teachers of Agric. Vol. 26 (3): 11–13, Urbana.Google Scholar
Sinden, J. A. 1980. Newspaper Cover of Environmental Issues in Australia 1978. Search, Vol. 11, No. 3: 64–67.Google Scholar
White, Lynn. 1971. The Historic Roots of Our Ecological Crisis. In: Man's Impact on Environment, Ed. Detwyler, T.R., McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. 1970. Environmental Ethics and Hope. In: Living in the Environment, G. Tyler Miller, Wads worth Publ. Co., Belmont, Calif.Google Scholar
Wright, Judith. 1963. Eroded Hills. In: Selected Poems, Five Senses. Augus and Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar