Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:31:34.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intergenerational Influence in Environmental Education: A Quantitative Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Roy Ballantyne
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology
John Fien
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Jan Packer
Affiliation:
Queensland University of Technology
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The process of intergenerational influence has important implications for environmental educators who wish to promote discussion about and action for the environment beyond the bounds of the school classroom. This paper examines the process of intergenerational influence in environmental education through a quantitative analysis of the factors influencing the frequency and nature of intergenerational discussion. The relationships among eight sets of variables are explored, including student and parent environmental orientation, the quality of family communication, program features, student enjoyment of the program, student learning through the program, and the frequency and nature of discussion of the program. The findings are discussed both in terms of their implications for environmental educators and for future research in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

Ballantyne, R., Connell, S. and Fien, J. 1998a, ‘Factors contributing to intergenerational communication regarding environmental programs: Preliminary research findings’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education. vol. 14, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Connell, S. and Fien, J. 1998b, ‘Students as catalysts of environmental change: A framework for researching intergenerational influence through environmental education’, Environmental Education Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 285298.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Fien, J. and Packer, J. in press, ‘Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: lessons from the field’, Journal of Environmental Education.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Fien, J. and Packer, J. in press, ‘School environmental education program impacts upon student and family learning: a case study analysis’, Environmental Education Research.Google Scholar
Bienvenu, M.J. 1969, ‘Measurement of parent-adolescent communication’, Family Coordinator, vol. 18, pp. 117121.Google Scholar
De Bono, E. 1992, Six Thinking Hats for Schools, Book 3 (Lower Secondary), Hawker Brownlow Education, Cheltenham, Vic.Google Scholar
Leeming, F.C., O'Dwyer, W.O. and Bracken, B.A. 1995, ‘Children's environmental knowledge and attitude scale: construction and validation’, Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 2231.Google Scholar
Moos, R.H. and Moos, B.S. 1981, Family Environment Scale Manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Uzzell, D. 1994, Children as Catalysts of Environmental Change: Final Report, European Commission Directorate General for Science Research and Development Joint Research Centre, Brussells.Google Scholar
Uzzell, D. and Rutland, A. 1993a, Intergenerational Relations: Can Children Influence Parents? Some Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Discussion paper for the First International Workshop on Children as Catalysts of Global Environmental Change, Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guilford, UK.Google Scholar
Uzzell, D.L. and Rutland, A. 1993b, Intergenerational Social Influence: Changing Environmental Competence and Performance in Children and Adults, Discussion paper for the Second International Workshop on Children as Catalysts of Global Environmental Change, CEFOPE, University of Braga, Portugal.Google Scholar
Weigel, D.J. & Weigel, R.R. 1993, ‘Intergenerational family communication: Generational differences in rural families’, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, vol. 10, pp. 467473.Google Scholar