Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:17:54.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drama as a Tool in Interpretation: Practitioner Perceptions of its Strengths & Limitations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Lynne Adcock  and
Roy Ballantyne
Lynne Adcock*
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Roy Ballantyne
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
*
†Visitor Research Unit, University of Queensland, School of Tourism, Ipswich Campus, 11 Salisbury Road, Ipswich, QLD 4035, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although environmental and heritage interpretation aims to connect humans with their natural and cultural heritage, and has the potential to contribute to a vision of sustainable living, it often falls short of engaging and inspiring its audiences. Some interpreters advocate the use of artistic approaches to create more affective (imaginary-emotional-sensory-aesthetic) experiences. One approach considered compatible is drama. Powerful dramatic experiences can embed interpretive stories in the emotions and leave enduring impressions. Drama is accepted as an interpretive tool overseas, yet it is under-utilised in Australia. How can it be used to strengthen interpretation in this country? This paper presents the outcomes of research investigating the perceptions of ten Queensland practitioners of dramatised interpretation regarding drama's strengths, limitations and value as a tool in interpretation. The authors contend that drama has much to offer interpretation, although further evaluative studies are clearly needed.

Keywords

Interpretationenvironmental interpretationenvironmental educationstorydramadramatised interpretationsustainabilityvisitorspractitionersperceptionsengagementprovocationlearningmeaning-makingaffectivecognitiveholisticconstructivistgroup learningsociocultural perspectivespersonal interviews
Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 23 , 2007 , pp. 31 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

References

Adcock, L. T. (2005). Practitioner perceptions of the effectiveness of dramatized interpretation. Masters Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Allen, S. (1997). Sociocultural theory in museums: Insights and suggestions. Journal of Museum Education, 22(2 & 3), 8–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, E. (2001). Towards a more sustainable education through stories and drama. Confirmation of PhD Candidature, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Appleby, E. (2005). Mrs Blue Gum, some puppets and a remnant forest: Towards sustainability education through drama pedagogy. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, R. R., & Bain, J. (1995). Enhancing environmental conceptions: An evaluation of cognitive conflict and structured controversy learning units. Studies in Higher Education, 20(3), 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, R. R., & Packer, J. (1996). Teaching and learning in environmental education: Developing environmental conceptions. The Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, R. R., & Packer, J. (2005). Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behavioiur through free-choice learning experiences: what's the state of the game? Environmental Education Research, 11 (3), 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballantyne, R. R., & Uzzell, D. (1999). International trends in heritage and environmental interpretation: Future trends for Australian research and practice. Journal of Interpretation Research, 4(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, L., & Hughes, C. (2001). Ten years of evaluating science theatre at the Museum of Science, Boston. Curator, 44(4), 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, E. (1994, 12). You see them here, you see them there, you see those interactives everywhere: But do they work? In papers presented at the third annual conference of the Interpretation Association Australia Inc, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia, 14–20.Google Scholar
Berry, T. (1999). The great work: Our way into the future. New York: Bell Tower.Google Scholar
Bicknell, S. (1994). Enlightening or embarrassing?: Drama in the Science Museum, London, UK. Visitor Studies: Theory Research and Practice 1993. Conference proceedings (Jacksonville, Centre for Social Design, 1994), 6, 79–88.Google Scholar
Broughton, R. L. (2002). In Online conference August 6-7, 2002, presented to the 2002 Ecotourism Association of Australia International Conference, 21-25 October 2002, Cairns, Australia. Canberra, Australia: Australian Heritage Commission and Ecotourism Association of Australia. Retrieved from http://www.ecotourismaustraliawide.net/Conference Details.asp Google Scholar
Cockett, S. (1998). What's real in drama? NADIE Journal, 22(2), 33–44.Google Scholar
Dierking, L. D. (1998). Interpretation as a social experience. In Uzzell, D.L., & Ballantyne, R.R. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation (pp. 56–76). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dungey, J. (1989). Where arts, imagination and environment meet. In Uzzell, D. (Ed.), Heritage interpretation: Vol. 1. The natural and built environment (pp. 229–231). London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Dyer, A., Hodgson, J., & Laycock, T. (1992). Dragonquest: Re-storying the landscape. Green Teacher, 25, 8–10.Google Scholar
Errington, E. (1991). Role playing and environmental issues. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J. J., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Gaskell, I., & Taylor, R. (2002). An analysis of the Wan Smolbag Theatre Company's impact on its audience. Unpublished research report, University of the South Pacific, Vanuatu. Retrieved from http://www.tellusconsultants.com/wansmolbag/contact.html Google Scholar
Gulikers, S. (1997). Discovering the environment through story: Environmental education towards the next millennium. Down Stream from PEEC, 3, 4–5.Google Scholar
Ham, S. (1992). Environmental interpretation. A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Golden, CO: North America Press.Google Scholar
Ham, S. (1997). Environmental education as strategic communication: A paradigm for the 21st century. In proceedings of the International symposium on human dimensions of natural resource management in the Americas, Belize City, Belize, 02 27, 1997.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. (2001). The fourth pillar of sustainability: Culture's essential role in public planning. Melbourne, Australia: Common Ground & the Cultural Development Network.Google Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1999). Education, communication and interpretation: towards a critical pedagogy in museums. In Hooper-Greenhill, E. (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 3–27). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hughes, C. (1998). Museum Theatre: Communicating With Visitors Through Drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinnemann.Google Scholar
Jackson, A., & Leahy, H. R. (2005). ‘Seeing it for real?’ - Authenticity, theatre and learning in museums. Research in Drama Education, 10(3), 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, J. (2003). Interpreters and the big story: Part 1 of 3: The most important story in history: And interpreters positioned to tell it. Legacy, 14(4), 36–37.Google Scholar
Knudson, D., Cable, T., & Beck, L. (1995). Interpretation of cultural and natural resources. State College, PA: Venture Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm-Davies, J. (2004). Borrowed robes: The educational value of costumed interpretation at historic sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(3), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
McNaughton, M. J. (2004). Educational drama in the teaching of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 10(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, M. J. (2006). Learning from participants' responses in educational drama in the teaching of Education for Sustainable Development. Research in Drama Education, 11(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, J. E. (2000). Creating positive interpretive experiences for visitors: Give em what they want and more. Legacy, July/August, 34–38.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R., & C'de Baca, J. (2001). Quantum change: When epiphanies and sudden insights transform ordinary lives. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Nwadigwe, C. E. (2007). ‘Meet us at the other side of the river’: Performance, venue and community education among migrant fishermen in Nigeria. Research in Drama Education, 12(1), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascoe, R. (1998). The language of drama: Making and communicating meaning. In More than words can say: A view of literacy through the arts (pp. 43–53). Canberra, Australia: Australian Centre for Arts Education.Google Scholar
Powell, R. M. (1995). Drama, as a technique that can be used in environmental interpretation and education. Masters thesis (042), University of Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. (1995). Narrative and Sociology. In Van Maanen, J. (Ed.), Representation in Ethnography. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schauble, L., Leinhardt, G., & Martin, L. (1997). A framework for organizing a cumulative research agenda in informal learning contexts. Journal of Museum Education, 22(2 & 3), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, C. A. (1995). Get provoked: Applying Tilden's principles. Legacy, July/August, 6–10.Google Scholar
Smith, G. A. (1998). Creating a public of environmentalists: The role of nonformal education. In Smith, G. A. & Williams, D. R. (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment (pp. 207–225). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tooth, R. (1997). The Pullenvale Storythread model. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 6(3), 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooth, R. (2006). Growing a sense of place: Storythread and the transformation of a school. Doctoral Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Tooth, R., Wager, L., Proellocks, T., Card, M., Braddock, K., & Butler, J. (1988). Story, setting and drama: A new look at environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 4, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzell, D. L. (1998). Planning for interpretive experiences. In Uzzell, D.L. & Ballantyne, R.R. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation (pp. 232–252). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Uzzell, D.L., & Ballantyne, R.R. (1998). Heritage that hurts: Interpretation in a postmodern world. In Uzzell, D.L. & Ballantyne, R.R. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in heritage and environmental interpretation (pp. 152–171). London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar