Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:27:10.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Designation of a Deleuzian Philosophy for Environmental Education and Its Consequences…

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2019

David R. Cole
David R. Cole*
Affiliation:
Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The philosophy of Gilles Deleuze has become popular in recent moves to embed approaches such as the new materialist and the posthuman in environmental education. Certainly, a newfound respect for the material universe, including the comprehension of the human place in it, and the tendency to a posthuman theoretical position, are both important given the contemporary environmental crisis, named as the Anthropocene. However, this article will argue that both these philosophies do not go far enough. This is because they must retain a political, social and critical edge if they are to be effective, and this edge can be too easily disregarded in the pursuit of increased engagement with the material and everything not human. In contrast, this article will put forward a Deleuzian approach to environmental education, based on the intellectual quadrant of Spinoza-Marx-Nietzsche-Bergson (Figure 1). It will be argued that only by fully connecting these often conflicting and disparate philosophies that a workable new synthesis for environmental education and a cartography for learning can be achieved. The Deleuzian approach to environmental education will be exemplified through an analysis of current environmental practises in schools as assemblage.

Keywords

environmental educationDeleuzedeath driveutopiathe socialfreedom to think
Type
Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , November 2019 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bataille, G. (2004). On Nietzsche (B. Boone, Trans.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48, 284–299.Google Scholar
Birdsall, S. (2010). Empowering students to act: Learning about, through and from the nature of action. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookchin, M. (1980). Towards an ecological society. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Bookchin, M. (1995). Social anarchism or lifestyle anarchism: An unbridgeable chasm. Chico, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, J.P.N., & Cole, D.R. (2018). Afterword: Zhibo, Existential Territory, Inter-Media-Mundia. In Cole, D.R. & Bradley, J.P.N. (Eds.), Principles of transversality in globalization and education (pp. 227–245). Geneva & Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassier, R. (2007). Nihil unbound: Enlightenment and extinction. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassier, R. (2014). Prometheanism and real abstraction. In Mackay, R., Pendrell, L. & Trafford, J. (Eds.), Speculative aesthetics (pp. 156–173). Penzance, UK: Urbanomic.Google Scholar
Cole, D.R. (2011). Educational life-forms: Deleuzian teaching and teaching practice. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.R. (2012). Matter in motion: The educational materialism of Gilles Deleuze. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44, S3–S17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.R. (2019a). Analysing the matter flows in schools using Deleuze’s method. Studies in Philosophy and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09650-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.R. (2019b). Nowhere ∥ Erewhon. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D.R., & Mirzaei Rafe, M. (2017). Conceptual ecologies for educational research through Deleuze, Guattari and Whitehead. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 849–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colebrook, C. (2013). The death of the posthuman: Essays on extinction (vol. 1). Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Crary, J. (2014). 24/7: Late capitalism and the end of sleep. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Curran, G. (1999). Murray Bookchin and the domination of nature. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2, 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London, England: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1984). Le cours de Gilles Deleuze 1979–1987 (K. Faulkner, Trans.). [The courses of Gilles Deleuze 1979–1987]. Retrieved from –https://blog.bcul.ch/2018/10/le-cours-de-gilles-deleuze-1979–1987/Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia II (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1998). Essays critical and clinical (D.W. Smith & M.A. Greco, Trans.). London & New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Steen & H.R. Lane, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchill, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Frankel, B. (1987). The post-industrial utopians. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Guattari, F. (2014). The three ecologies (I. Pindar & P. Sutton, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jickling, B. (2013). Normalising catastrophe: An educational response. Environmental Education Research, 19, 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miéville, C. (2019). Silence in debris: Towards an apophatic Marxism. Salvage Magazine, (February), 17–26. Retrieved from https://www.patreon.com/salvagedotzoneGoogle Scholar
Negarestani, R. (2011). Drafting the inhuman: Conjectures on capitalism and organic necrocracy. In Bryant, L., Srnicek, N., & Harman, G. (Eds.), The speculative turn: Continental materialism and realism (pp. 182–202). Melbourne, Australia: re.press.Google Scholar
Newell, P., & Paterson, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, P.G. (2016). What next? Post-critical materialisms in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saari, A., & Mullen, J. (2018). Dark places: Environmental education research in a world of hyperobjects. Environmental Education Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1522618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, C.N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A.D., Poirier, C., Gałuszka, A., … Wolfe, A.P. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351, 6269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisman, A. (2008). The world without us. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar