Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:02:17.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arts Education as a Vehicle for Social Change: An Empirical Study of Eco Arts in the K-12 Classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2017

Jeniffer Sams  and
Doreen Sams
Jeniffer Sams*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Doreen Sams
Affiliation:
Georgia College & State University, Milledgeville, Georgia, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Jeniffer Sams, Indiana University, 107 S Indiana Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arts education has been part of the United States K-12 educational system for over a century. However, recent administrative policy decisions addressed the economic bottom line and the 1983 report, A Nation at Risk, and complied with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 (U.S. Department of Education, 2001). These decisions resulted in standardisation of both core curricula and testing, leaving arts programs to function in a diminished capacity, curtailing both individuality and creative thinking. This study unpacks the role of the arts as change agents with the ability to: address current discourse; question ideologies and culture; convey complex problems in artistic form; engage the viewer in aesthetics; provide a perspective not found in regimented thinking; and empower creative problem solvers. This work also highlights the role of eco-art as a medium for addressing complex environmental challenges. The study also empirically examines, through a self-report survey, K-12 arts educators’ perceptions of integrating eco-arts into curricula. Findings revealed respondents’ desire to integrate eco-arts into the arts curricula and identified the most significantly perceived barriers to integration, as well as the role of policy on practicality. The authors also identify the study's limitations and recommend areas for future research.

Keywords

curriculumeducationeducatorsenvironmental educationarts-basedsocio-ecological approachsustainability
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , July 2017 , pp. 61 - 80
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T., & Guyas, A. (2012). Earth education: Interbeing and deep ecology. Studies in Art Education, 53, 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudrillard, J. (2005). The conspiracy of art: Manifestos, interviews, essays. Lotringer, S. (Ed.), A Hodges (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2006). Rethinking the social impact of the arts: A critical-historical review. Coventry, UK: Centre of Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. (2016). Partnership for the 21st century skills (P21). Retrieved from https://www.imls.gov/assets/1/AssetManager/Bishop%20Pre-Con%202.pdf Google Scholar
Blandy, D., & Fenn, J. (2012). Sustainability: Sustaining cities and community cultural development. Studies in Art Education, 53, 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14–25.Google Scholar
Chiarotto, L., & Leman, D. (2011). Natural curiosity: Building children's understanding of the world through environmental inquiry (A resource for teachers). Toronto, Canada: The Laboratory School, University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/ Google Scholar
Children's Music Workshop. (2006). Facts and statistics. Retrieved from http://www.childrensmusicworkshop.com/advocacy/factsandstatistics.html Google Scholar
Colom, R., Karama, S., Jung, R.E., & Haier, R.J. (2010). Human intelligence and brain networks. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 489–501.Google Scholar
Curtis, D.J. (2009). Creating inspiration: The role of the arts in creating empathy for ecological restoration. Ecological Management & Restoration, 10 (3), 174–184. doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2009.00487.x Google Scholar
Curtis, D.J. (2010). Plague and the moonflower: A regional community celebrates the environment. Music and Arts in Action, 3, 65–85.Google Scholar
Curtis, D.J., Reid, N., & Reeve, I. (2014). Towards ecological sustainability: Observations on the role of the arts. SAPIENS. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, 7, 1–15.Google Scholar
Cutter-Mackenzie, A., Edwards, S., Moore, D., & Boyd, W. (2014). Young children's play and environmental education in early childhood education. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailey, W. (2013). Cone releases 2013: Cone Communications green gap trend tracker. Cone Communications. Retrieved from http://www.conecomm.com/2013-green-gap-trend-tracker-1 Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Minton, Balch & Company.Google Scholar
Dieleman, H. (2008). Sustainability, art and reflexivity. In Kagan, S. & Kirchberg, V. (Eds.), Sustainability: A new frontier for the arts and cultures (pp. 108–146). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: VAS (Verlag für Akademische Schriften).Google Scholar
Drijfhout, S., Bathiany, S., Beaulieu, C., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Huntingford, C., & Swingedouw, D. (2015). Catalogue of abrupt shifts in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate models. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, E5777–E5786.Google Scholar
Efland, A.D. (1990). A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, E.W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P., & Cummings, R. (2007). Cultural diversity, discrimination, and economic outcomes: An experimental analysis. Economic Inquiry, 45, 217–232.Google Scholar
Frock, C.L. (2013). Artists who confront violence: An introduction. Retrieved from http://www.kqed.org/arts/multimedia/article.jsp?essid=122671 Google Scholar
Froebel, F. (1899). Pedagogics of the kindergarten (Trans. J. Jarvis). London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Garber, E. (2013). Craft as activism. The Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 33, 53–66.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. (2010). Are schools killing your child's creativity? Retrieved from http://news.change.org/stories/are-schools-killing-your-childs-creativity Google Scholar
Green, J.A. (1905). The educational ideas of Pestalozzi. Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York.Google Scholar
Waste, Green. (2014). Recycling stats. Retrieved from http://www.greenwaste.com/recycling-stats.Google Scholar
Hecht, M.L. (1993). A research odyssey: Towards the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs, 60, 76–82.Google Scholar
Hecht, M.L., Jackson, R.L., & Ribeau, S.A. (2003). African American communication: Exploring identity and culture (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G.H. (2001). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
IES National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). The nation's report card: Arts. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009488 Google Scholar
Inwood, H. (2008). Mapping eco-art education. Canadian Review of Art Education: Research & Issues, 35, 57–73.Google Scholar
Jolly, A. (2014). STEM vs. STEAM: Do the arts belong? Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2014/11/18/ctq-jolly-stem-vs-steam.html Google Scholar
Kastner, J., & Wallis, B. (Eds.). (1998). Land and environmental art. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
KAB.org. (2009). Recycling facts and stats. Retrieved from http://www.kab.org/site/PageServer?pagename=recycling_facts_and_stats Google Scholar
Lehtonen, K., Juvonen, A., & Ruismäki, H. (2014). Seven viewpoints to arts and arts education. Spaces of Creation, (21), 52–73.Google Scholar
Lu, L. (2006). Cultural fit: Individual and societal discrepancies in values, beliefs, and subjective well-being. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 203–221.Google Scholar
McKnight, D.M. (2010). Overcoming ‘ecophobia’: Fostering environmental empathy through narrative in children's science literature. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8, e10–e15.Google Scholar
Marks, M. (2015). Visualizing the environment: The power of environmental art to encourage pro-environmental behavior and engender a sense of place. Sippy Downs, Australia: University of the Sunshine Coast.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D.R. (2000). Culture and psychology: People around the world. Delmar, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Montessori, M. (1917). The advanced Montessori method (vol. 1). New York, NY: Frederick A. Stokes Company.Google Scholar
Nadius, B. (2009). Facilitating an interdisciplinary arts curriculum. Arts for change: Teaching outside the frame. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.Google Scholar
Nakata, C.C., & Huang, Y. (2002). Culture theory in global marketing research: An assessment from the literature. Conference Proceedings, Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 94.Google Scholar
National Education Association. (2002). Partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved from http://www.nea.org/home/34888.htm Google Scholar
Niland, A. (2009). The power of musical play: The value of play-based, child-centered curriculum in early childhood music education. General Music Today, 23, 17–21.Google Scholar
Orr, D.W. (1992) Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Penuel, K.B., Stapler, M., & Hagen, R. (Eds.). (2013). Encyclopedia of crisis management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollak, M., & MacNabb, M. (2000). Hearts and minds: Creative Australians and the environment. Sydney, Australia: Hale & Iremonger.Google Scholar
Quigley, B.L. (1998). Identification as a key term in Kenneth Burke's rhetorical theory. American Communications Journal, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. West Sussex, UK: Capstone Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Robinson, K. (2006). Ken Robinson: How schools kill creativity [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_saysschools_kill_creativity/transcript#t-21698 Google Scholar
Ross, D. (Ed.). (2002). Homepage P21. Retrieved from http://p21.gallery/ Google Scholar
Sabraw, J. (2013a). Chroma S1 12 [Painting]. Retrieved from http://www.johnsabraw.com/chroma/ Google Scholar
Sabraw, J. (2013b). Chroma S1 13 [Painting]. Retrieved from http://www.johnsabraw.com/chroma/ Google Scholar
Sabraw, J. (2013c). John Sabraw: Arts and science. Retrieved from http://www.johnsabraw.com/chroma/bypcilu5r1pr2brth34tquhzgq076h Google Scholar
Smith, F. (2009). Why arts education is crucial, and who's doing it best. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/arts-music-curriculum-child-development Google Scholar
Stevenson, R.B., & Dillon, J. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging environmental education: Learning, culture, and agency. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A., & Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2015). Learning with children, ants, and worms in the Anthropocene: Towards a common world pedagogy of multispecies vulnerability. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23, 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The White House. (2013). Educate to innovate. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/k-12/educate-innovate Google Scholar
Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Trischler, H. (2016). The Anthropocene: A challenge for the history of science, technology, and the environment. NTM Journal of the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, 24, 309–335. doi:10.1007/s00048-016-0146-3 Google Scholar
United Nations. (2016). Rate of environmental damage increasing across planet but still time to reverse worst impacts. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2016/05/rate-of-environmental-damage-increasing-across-planet-but-still-time-to-reverse-worst-impacts/ Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No child left behind. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Homeroom. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/04/ed-releases-new-report-on-arts-education-in-u-s-public-schools Google Scholar
U.S. EPA Office of Policy. (2016). Environmental stewardship. Retrieved from https://archive.epa.gov/stewardship/web/html/ Google Scholar
Ward, K.S. (2010). The living curriculum: A natural wonder: Enhancing the ways in which early childhood educators scaffold young children's learning about the environment by using self-generated creative arts experiences as a core component of the early childhood program. Sydney, Australia: Western Sydney University.Google Scholar
Weintraub, L. (2012). To life! Eco art in pursuit of a sustainable planet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
York, R.A. (2014). Re-connecting with nature: Transformative environmental education through the arts. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto.Google Scholar