Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:21:41.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Applying a Feminist Critique to Environmental Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Giovanna Di Chiro
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

One thing about which there is widespread consensus is that the earth and its inhabitants are in social and environmental peril. This is where the consensus ends, however, for there is equally widespread disagreement as to the nature and causes of the problems (more social or more environmental), the severity of the problems (for whom are they recognised and felt as problems), and the most appropriate and effective solutions necessary to deal with them. This paper argues for the adoption of a critical, feminist perspective in examining the area of Environmental Education (EE) as an ‘appropriate response’ to this globally perceived socio-environmental crisis.

Historically, environmental education emerged out of the early 1970's during the time when the environmental movement was gaining momentum and vitality on a worldwide scale (Disinger, 1983; Robottom, 1985a; Stapp, 1970). It was envisioned by the international participants at the three major UNESCO-UNEP Environment Conferences held that decade, that EE was the most appropriate and hopeful educational response to the crisis situation of the deterioration of quality of life and the environment (Fensham, 1978).

The aims of EE that emerged from the UN conference in Tbilisi, USSR in 1977 were particularly ambitious in that they transcended a concern with the roles, objectives and guiding principles of EE and spelled out the need for an understanding of:

… the epistemological and institutional structures that affect consideration of environmental demands” … and …. “the obstacles (epistemological, cultural or social) restricting access to educational messages and their utilization” (Robottom, 1985b).

Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 3 , July 1987 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

Boserup, E. Women's Role in Economic Development. St Martin's Press: New York, 1970.Google Scholar
Caldecott, L. and Leland, S. (eds). Reclaim the Earth, Women speak out for Life on Earth. The Women's Press: London. 1983, p. 74.Google Scholar
Cambridge Women's Peace Collective. My Country is the Whole World, An Anthology of Women's Work on Peace and War. Pandora Press: London 1984, p. 258.Google Scholar
Connell, R.W. et. al. Making the Difference: Schools, Families and Social Division. Allen and Unwin: Sydney, 1982, p. 180.Google Scholar
Disinger, J. “Environmental Education's Definitional Problem” ERIC/SMEAC Informational Bulletin, No. 2. Columbus, OH, 1983.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, H. Contemporary Feminist Thought, Unwin: London, 1984.Google Scholar
Ellyard, P. 1981. “Education and the Environment -- where do they meet?” In Proceedings: First National Conference Australian Association for Environmental Education Adelaide, 1981, p. 10–14.Google Scholar
Fensham, P. 1978. “Stockholm to Tbilisi -- the evolution of environmental education” Prospects. 8(4), 1979, p. 446–455.Google Scholar
Hartstock, N. “Feminist Theory and Revolutionary Strategy”, 1979. Cited in Feminist Knowledge as Critique and Construct Reader for course HUX352, Deakin University: Geelong, 1986, p. 13.Google Scholar
Millett, K. Sexual Politics. Virago: London, ([1970] 1977).Google Scholar
Pepper, D. The Roots of Modern Environmentalism. Croom Helm: London, 1984. Robottom, I. M. Contestation and Continuity in Educational Reform: A Critical Study of Innovations in Environmental Education. PhD Thesis, School of Education Deakin University, 1985 a.Google Scholar
Robottom, I. M. “ Evaluation in Environmental Education Time for a Change in Perspective?” The Journal of Environmental Education 17(1), 1985b, p. 31–36.Google Scholar
Ruether, R. R. New Woman New Earth. Seabury Press: New York, 1975, p. 3.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E. F. Small Is Beautiful. Abacus: London, 1973.Google Scholar
Stapp, W.B. “The Concept of Environmental Education.” Educational Digest. 03, 1970, p. 7–12.Google Scholar
Stone, M. When God was a Woman. Dial Press: New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Strange, P. It'll Make a Man of You, A feminist view of the arms race. Peace News/Mushroom: Nottingham 1983.Google Scholar
Tuntawiroon, N. “North-South Dialogue.” In Proceedings: North American Association for Environmental Education Conference. Banff, Canada, 1986, p. 119.Google Scholar
Unesco. Environmental education in the light of the Tbilisi conference. Unesco: Paris, 1980, p. 27.Google Scholar
Weston, J. (ed) Red and Green, The New Politics of the Environment. Pluto Press: London, 1986.Google Scholar
Women and Geography Study Group of the IBG. Geography and Gender. Hutchison: London, 1984, p. 30.Google Scholar
Women: A World Report. A New Internationalist Book. Methuen: London, 1985, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar