Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T11:50:35.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tensions in Home–School Partnerships: The Different Perspectives of Teachers and Parents of Students With Learning Barriers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2012

Penelope Ludicke  and
Wendy Kortman
Penelope Ludicke*
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Australia
Wendy Kortman
Affiliation:
Deakin University, Australia
*
Correspondence: Penelope Ludicke, 9 Benjamin Street, Trevallyn, Launceston, Tas. 7250, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a qualitative study of learning partnerships between teachers and parents of students with learning barriers. The aim was to investigate the beliefs and understandings of parents and teacher participants around roles in partnerships, so as to identify operational processes that support effective collaboration. The study was based on the premise that home–school partnerships have been established as a positive influence on the education of students with learning barriers but tensions exist within these partnerships in practice. In the study it was posited that some tensions stemmed from differences in role understandings between parent and teacher. Data revealed key themes emerging from the case studies. Findings indicated that parents and teachers believed that involvement and partnerships are integral to supporting the learning of students with learning barriers. However, differences emerged as to how teachers and parents constructed and interpreted involvement and operational processes supporting partnerships, and the significance each group placed on different aspects of collaboration between parent and teacher.

Keywords

home–school partnershipslearning barrierstensionsperspectives
Type
Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , December 2012 , pp. 155 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspland, T. (2003). A research narrative: Confronting the tensions of methodological struggle. In O'Donoghue, T. & Punch, K. (Eds.), Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting (pp. 126–151). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2010). My School. Retrieved from http://www.myschool.edu.auGoogle Scholar
Australian Government Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2008). Family-schools partnerships framework: A guide for schools and families. Canberra: Author. Retrieved from http://www.familyschool.org.au/pdf/framework.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bastiani, J. (2000). ‘I know it works . . . actually proving it is the problem!’: Examining the contribution of parents to pupil progress and school effectiveness. In Wolfendale, S. & Bastiani, J. (Eds.), The contribution of parents to school effectiveness (pp. 19–36). London, UK: Fulton.Google Scholar
Biddle, B.J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blue-Banning, M., Summers, J.A., Frankland, H.C., Nelson, L.L., & Beegle, G. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brassett-Grundy, A. (2004). Family life and learning: Emergent themes. In Schuller, T., Preston, J., Hammond, C., Brassett-Grundy, A., & Bynner, J. (Eds.), The benefits of learning: The impact of education on health, family life and social capital (pp. 80–98). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Bui, Y.N. (2009). How to write a master's thesis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bynner, J. (2004). Literacy, numeracy and employability: Evidence from the British birth cohort studies. Literacy & Numeracy Studies, 13, 31–48.Google Scholar
Chavkin, N.F. (2005). Preparing educators for school–family partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. In Patrikakou, E.N., Weissberg, R.P., Redding, S., & Walberg, H.J. (Eds.), School-family partnerships for children's success (pp. 164–180). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Christenson, S.L., Godber, Y., & Anderson, A.R. (2005). Critical issues facing families and educators. In Patrikakou, E.N., Weissberg, R.P., Redding, S., & Walberg, H.J. (Eds.), School-family partnerships for children's success (pp. 21–39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R., Ashendon, D.J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G.W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney, Australia: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Constantino, S.M. (2003). Engaging all families: Creating a positive school culture by putting research into practice. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.Google Scholar
Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, M.E.P. (2001). Rethinking family–school relations: A critique of parental involvement in schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1990). Literacy for empowerment: The role of parents in children's education. Abingdon, UK: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Desforges, C. (with Abouchaar, A.) (2003). The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: A literature review (Research Report RR433). London, UK: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
Deslandes, R. (2009a). Introduction. In Deslandes, R. (Ed.), International perspectives on contexts, communities and evaluated innovative practices: Family–school–community partnerships (pp. 1–7). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deslandes, R. (2009b). Conclusion. In Deslandes, R. (Ed.), International perspectives on contexts, communities and evaluated innovative practices: Family–school–community partnerships (pp. 220–227). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhillon, J.K. (2009). The role of social capital in sustaining partnership. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 687–704. doi:10.1080/01411920802642348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, J. (2009). Legislation, policies and principles. In Ashman, A. & Elkins, J. (Eds.), Education for inclusion and diversity (3rd ed., pp. 35–55). Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Epstein, J.L., Sanders, M.G., & Simon, B.S. (2002). School, family and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Fylling, I., & Sandvin, J.T. (1999). The role of parents in special education: The notion of partnership revised. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14, 144–157. doi:10.1080/0885625990140205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartner, A., Lipsky, D.K., & Turnbull, A.P. (1991). Supporting families with a child with a disability: An international outlook. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Harry, B. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74, 372–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children's education? Review of Educational Research, 67, 3–42. doi:10.2307/1170618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., Walker, J.M.T., Sandler, H.M., Whetsel, D., Green, C.L., Wilkins, A.S., & Closson, K. (2005). Why do parents become involved? Research findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 105–130. doi:10.1086/499194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, J.F., & Billingsley, B.S. (2000). An analysis of factors that contribute to parent–school conflict in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 240–251. doi:10.1177/074193250002100407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32 (3), 34–62.Google Scholar
Leithwood, K. (2009). Four key policy questions about parent engagement recommendations from the evidence. In Deslandes, R. (Ed.), International perspectives on contexts, communities and evaluated innovative practices: Family–school–community partnerships (pp. 8–20). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Macgregor, R. (2005). Exploring the dynamics of effective and innovative family-school and community partnerships across Australia. Retrieved from http://www.familyschool.org.au/pdf/exploringdynamics.pdfGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J.R., & Kirkpatrick, S. (2005). Negotiating public and private: Maternal mediations of home-school boundaries. In Crozier, G. & Reay, D. (Eds.), Activating participation: Parents and teachers working towards partnership (pp. 59–82). Stoke-on-Trent, UK: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Minke, K.M., & Scott, M.M. (1993). The development of individualized family service plans: Roles for parents and staff. Journal of Special Education, 27, 82–106. doi:10.1177/002246699302700106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollison Floyd, L., & Vernon-Dotson, L.J. (2009). Using home learning tool kits to facilitate family involvement. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 160–166. doi:10.1177/1053451208326049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, R. (2007). New teachers, professional knowledge and educational reform in New Zealand (Doctoral dissertation). Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Phillips, D.C. (1990). Subjectivity and objectivity: An objective inquiry. In Eisner, E.W. & Peshkin, A. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 19–35). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Porter, L. (2008). Teacher–parent collaboration: Early childhood to adolescence. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Education Research.Google Scholar
Pendergast, D., Renshaw, P., & Harris, J. (2010). Community. In Pendergast, D. & Bahr, N. (Eds.), Teaching middle years: Rethinking, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 286–300). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Queensland Government, Department of Education. (2011). Disability support. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/studentservices/learning/disability/iep/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rich, A. (2000). Beyond the classroom: How parents influence their children's education. St Leonards, Australia: Centre for Independent Studies.Google Scholar
Reay, D. (2005). Mothers’ involvement in their children's schooling: Social reproduction in action. In Crozier, G. & Reay, D. (Eds.), Activating participation: Parents and teachers working towards partnership (pp. 23–38). Stoke-on-Trent, England: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
Reay, D. (2009). ‘Class acts’: Home–school involvement and working-class parents in the UK. In Deslandes, R. (Ed.), International perspectives on contexts, communities and evaluated innovative practices: Family–school–community partnerships (pp. 50–63). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, M.A., Wiener, J., Marton, I., & Tannock, R. (2009). Parental involvement in children's learning: Comparing parents of children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Journal of School Psychology, 47, 167–185. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.02.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, A.B. (2006). Methodology: Collecting data. In Antonesa, M., Fallon, H., Ryan, A.B., Ryan, A., & Walsh, T. (with L. Borys), Researching and writing your thesis: A guide for postgraduate students. Maynooth, Ireland: Maynooth Adult and Community Education. Retrieved from http://eprints.nuim.ie/archive/00000872/Google Scholar
Saulwick Muller Social Research. (2006). Family-School Partnerships project: A qualitative and quantitative study. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), Australian Council of State School Organisations (ACSSO) and Australian Parents Council (APC). Retrieved from http://www.familyschool.org.au/pdf/muller.pdfGoogle Scholar
Siedman, I.E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Slee, R. (1995). Changing theories and practices of discipline. London, UK: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Smit, F., & Driessen, G. (2009). Creating effective family–school partnerships in highly diverse contexts: Building partnership models and constructing parent typologies. In Deslandes, R. (Ed.), International perspectives on contexts, communities and evaluated innovative practices: Family–school–community partnerships (pp. 64–81). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomson, P. (2002). Strengthening family-school relationships: A story about using research to develop policy and practice in Tasmania, Australia. International Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6 (13). Retrieved from http://iejll.synergiesprairies.ca/iejll/index.php/iejll/article/view/443Google Scholar
Todd, L. (2003). Disability and the restructuring of welfare: The problem of partnership with parents. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7, 281–296. doi:10.1080/1360311032000108894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, S. (1996). Conflicts and dilemmas for professionals in special education. In Christensen, C. & Rizvi, F. (Eds.), Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice (pp. 175–186). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Tuettemann, E. (2003). Grounded theory illuminates interpersonal relationships: An educator's perspective. In O'Donoghue, T. & Punch, K. (Eds.), Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting (pp. 7–25). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Turnbull, A.P., & Turnbull, H.R. III, (1990). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vincent, C., & Tomlinson, S. (1997). Home–school relationships: ‘The swarming of disciplinary mechanisms?’ British Educational Research Journal, 23, 361–377. doi:10.1080/0141192970230308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Williams, R., & Pritchard, C. (2006). Breaking the cycle of educational alienation: A multi-professional approach. Maidenhead, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfendale, S. (2000). Effective schools for the future: Incorporating the parental and family dimension. In Wolfendale, S. & Bastiani, J. (Eds.), The contribution of parents to school effectiveness (pp. 1–18). London, UK: Fulton.Google Scholar
Wolfendale, S. (2006). Partnerships in learning: In the interests of children, benefiting all. Australian Council of State School Organisations (ACSSO). Retrieved from http://www.familyschool.org.au/pdf/partnershipsinlearning.pdfGoogle Scholar