Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:16:08.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teacher Assistant Supports in Inclusive Schools: Research, Practices and Alternatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2013

Michael F. Giangreco
Michael F. Giangreco*
Affiliation:
University of Vermont, USA
*
Correspondence: Michael F. Giangreco, Center on Disability & Community Inclusion, University of Vermont, 208 Colchester Avenue, Mann Hall 301A, Burlington, Vermont 05405–1757, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I summarise the primary content included in a keynote address I delivered via videoconferencing in July 2012 at the national conference of the Australian Association of Special Education, held jointly with the annual conference of the Tasmanian Principals Association in Hobart, Tasmania. The address focused on three major topics pertaining to the utilisation of teacher assistants in inclusive schools: (a) persistent and emerging research trends, (b) contemporary conceptual and data-based concerns, and (c) ideas about what schools can do to provide improved educational opportunities and supports for students with special educational needs in inclusive classrooms. The article concludes that the potential overuse or misuse of teacher assistants is a symptom, not cause. Building integrated models of general and special service delivery in schools can address the challenges associated with questionable teacher assistant utilisation.

Keywords

inclusive educationservice deliveryteacher assistantsparaprofessionals
Type
Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , December 2013 , pp. 93 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Association of Special Education. (2007). Position paper on teacher aides. Bomaderry, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aase.edu.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemid=99Google Scholar
Bingham, M.A., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. (2007). Training paraeducators to promote the use of augmentative and alternative communication by students with significant disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 339–352.Google Scholar
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., Russell, A., & Webster, R. (2011). The impact of support staff on pupils’ ‘positive approaches to learning’ and their academic progress. British Educational Research Journal, 37, 443–464. doi:10.1080/01411921003734645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatchford, P., Russell, A., & Webster, R. (2011). Reassessing the impact of teaching assistants: How research challenges practice and policy. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourke, P.E. (2009). Professional development and teacher aides in inclusive education contexts: Where to from here? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 817–827. doi:10.1080/13603110802128588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, P., & Carrington, S. (2007). Inclusive education reform: Implications for teacher aides. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 31, 15–24. doi:10.1080/10300110601184701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broer, S.M., Doyle, M.B., & Giangreco, M.F. (2005). Perspectives of students with intellectual disabilities about their experiences with paraprofessional support. Exceptional Children, 71, 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Farrington, K., Knight, T., Ross, C., & Ziegler, M. (1999). Fewer paraprofessionals and more teachers and therapists in educational programs for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, R., & Lowe, K. (2012). Teaching assistants and class teachers: Differing perceptions, role confusion and the benefits of skills-based training. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16, 207–219. doi:10.1080/13603111003739678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, E., O'Rourke, L., Sisco, L.G., & Pelsue, D. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 344–359. doi:10.1177/0741932508324399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, E.W., Sisco, L.G., Brown, L., Brickham, D., & Al-Khabbaz, Z.A. (2008). Peer interactions and academic engagement of youth with developmental disabilities in inclusive middle and high school classrooms. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 479–494. doi:10.1352/2008.113:479-494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Causton-Theoharis, J.N., Giangreco, M.F., Doyle, M.B., & Vadasy, P.F. (2007). Paraprofessionals: The “sous-chefs” of literacy instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40 (1), 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causton-Theoharis, J.N., & Malmgren, K.W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council for Exceptional Children. (2008). CEC's position on response to intervention (RTI): The unique role of special education and special educators. Arlington, VA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cec.sped.org/~/Media/Files/Policy/CECProfessionalPoliciesandPositions/RTI.pdfGoogle Scholar
D'Alessio, S., & Watkins, A. (2009). International comparisons of inclusive policy and practice: Are we talking about the same thing? Research in Comparative & International Education, 4, 233–249. doi:10.2304/rcie.2009.4.3.233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, P. (2005). Effect of continuous improvement training on student interaction and engagement. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 47–59. doi:10.2511/rpsd.30.2.47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, M., & Pleasants, S.L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 287–297. doi:10.1177/0741932510397762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, N.K. (2001). Supervising paraprofessionals: A survey of teacher practices. Journal of Special Education, 35, 41–53. doi:10.1177/002246690103500105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghere, G., & York-Barr, J. (2007). Paraprofessional turnover and retention in inclusive programs: Hidden costs and promising practices. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 21–32. doi:10.1177/07419325070280010301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F. (2003). Working with paraprofessionals. Educational Leadership, 61 (2), 50–53.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M.F. (2010). One-to-one paraprofessionals for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Is conventional wisdom wrong? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 1–13. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-48.1.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giangreco, M.F., & Broer, S.M. (2003). Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Center on Disability and Community Inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.uvm.edu/~cdci/evolve/gsa.htmlGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., & Broer, S.M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes? Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26. doi:10.1177/10883576050200010201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., & Broer, S.M. (2007). School-based screening to determine overreliance on paraprofessionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 149–158. doi:10.1177/10883576070220030201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Edelman, S.W. (1999). The tip of the iceberg: Determining whether paraprofessional support is needed for students with disabilities in general education settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Edelman, S.W. (2001). Teacher engagement with students with disabilities: Differences based on paraprofessional service delivery models. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Broer, S.M., & Suter, J.C. (2011). Guidelines for selecting alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals: Field-testing in inclusion-oriented schools. Remedial and Special Education, 32, 22–38. doi:10.1177/0741932509355951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Carter, E.W., Doyle, M.B., & Suter, J.C. (2010). Supporting students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms: Personnel and peers. In Rose, R. (Ed.), Confronting obstacles to inclusion: International responses to developing inclusive schools (pp. 247–263). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., & Doyle, M.B. (2007). Teacher assistants in inclusive schools. In Florian, L. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (pp. 429–439). London, UK: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781848607989.n33Google Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Doyle, M.B., & Suter, J.C. (2012). Constructively responding to requests for paraprofessionals: We keep asking the wrong questions. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 362–373. doi:10.1177/0741932511413472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Doyle, M.B., & Suter, J.C. (in press). Teacher assistants in inclusive classrooms. In Florian, L. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. TBD). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., & Broer, S.M. (2003). Schoolwide planning to improve paraeducator supports. Exceptional Children, 70, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., Broer, S.M., & Doyle, M.B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Edelman, S.W., Luiselli, T.E., & MacFarland, S.Z. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Halvorsen, A.T., Doyle, M.B., & Broer, S.M. (2004). Alternatives to overreliance on paraprofessionals in inclusive schools. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 17, 82–90.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Hurley, S.M., & Suter, J.C. (2009). Special education personnel utilization and general class placement of students with disabilities: Ranges and ratios. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 53–56. doi:10.1352/2009.47:53-56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giangreco, M.F., Smith, C.S., & Pinckney, E. (2006). Addressing the paraprofessional dilemma in an inclusive school: A program description. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Suter, J.C., & Doyle, M.B. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 41–57. doi:10.1080/10474410903535356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Suter, , & Graf, V. (2011). Roles of team members supporting students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. In Giangreco, M.F., Cloninger, C.J., & Iverson, V.S. (Eds.), Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities (3rd. ed., pp. 197–204). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M.F., Suter, J.S., & Hurley, S.M. (2011). Revisiting personnel utilization in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022466911419015Google Scholar
Groom, B., & Rose, R. (2005). Supporting the inclusion of pupils with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties in the primary school: The role of teaching assistants. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 5, 20–30. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2005.00035.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmingsson, H., Borell, L., & Gustavsson, A. (2003). Participation in school: School assistants creating opportunities and obstacles for pupils with disabilities. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research: Occupation, Participation and Health, 23 (3), 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, R., & Ford, J. (2007). The roles and responsibilities of teacher aides supporting students with special needs in secondary school settings. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 31, 25–43. doi:10.1080/10300110701268461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, A. (2006). The role of the special needs assistant supporting pupils with special educational needs in Irish mainstream primary schools. Support for Learning, 21, 92–99. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9604.2006.00410.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmgren, K.W., & Causton-Theoharis, J.N. (2006). Boy in the bubble: Effects of paraprofessional proximity and other pedagogical decisions on the interactions of a student with behavioral disorders. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20, 301–312. doi:10.1080/02568540609594569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmgren, K.W., Causton-Theoharis, J.N., & Trezek, B.J. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with behavioral disorders via paraprofessional training. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, S.U., Schrader, C., & Levine, M. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own? Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, J., Johnson, J.W., Polychronis, S., & Risen, T. (2002). Effects of embedded instruction on students with moderate disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 363–377.Google Scholar
Quilty, K.M. (2007). Teaching paraprofessionals how to write and implement Social Stories for students with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 182–189. doi:10.1177/07419325070280030701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, C.G., & Mueller, P.H. (2001). Employment and utilization of paraeducators in inclusive settings. Journal of Special Education, 35, 54–62. doi:10.1177/002246690103500106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubie-Davies, C.M., Blatchford, P., Webster, R., Koutsoubou, M., & Bassett, P. (2010). Enhancing learning? A comparison of teacher and teaching assistant interactions with pupils. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 429–449. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.512800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, G. (2011). Doing right by teacher aides, students with disabilities, and relational social justice. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, G. (2012). In, out or somewhere in between? Disabled students’ and teacher aides’ experiences of school. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16, 757–774. doi:10.1080/13603116.2010.509818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaddock, A. J., Nielsen, T. W., Giorcelli, L., Kilham, C.H., & Hoffman-Raap, L. (2007). What are the critical factors in ensuring successful collaboration between mainstream teachers and teaching assistants? In Shaddock, A. J., Smyth King, B., & Giorcelli, L. (Eds.), A project to improve the learning outcomes of students with disabilities in the early, middle and post compulsory years of schooling. Part 1: Research objectives, methodology, analyses, outcomes and findings, and implications for classroom practice (pp. 209–259). Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science & Training. Retrieved from http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/items/a5cc5891-3ac6-5572-bab4-b7d439ab3db1/1/Google Scholar
Skär, L., & Tamm, M. (2001). My assistant and I: Disabled children's and adolescents’ roles and relationships to their assistants. Disability & Society, 16, 917–931. doi:10.1080/09687590120084010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, J.C., & Giangreco, M.F. (2009). Numbers that count: Exploring special education and paraprofessional service delivery in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education, 43, 81–93. doi:10.1177/0022466907313353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tews, L., & Lupart, J. (2008). Students with disabilities’ perspectives of the role and impact of paraprofessionals in inclusive education settings. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 5, 39–46. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130.2007.00138.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, R.H, Ratcliff, N., Jones, C., Vaden, S.R., Hunt, G., & Sheehan, H.C. (2012). The myth of the foolproof script: Can paraprofessionals effectively improve kindergarten student achievement using a scripted phonics program? Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, 32, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillery, C.Y., Werts, M.G., Roark, R., & Harris, S. (2003). Perceptions of paraeducators on job retention. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 118–127. doi:10.1177/088840640302600205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, T., Shin, J., Bartholomay, T., & Stahl, B.J. (2001). Knowledge and skills for teachers supervising the work of paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 67, 520–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, R., Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Brown, P., Martin, C., & Russell, A. (2010). Double standards and first principles: Framing teaching assistant support for pupils with special educational needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25, 319–336. doi:10.1080/08856257.2010.513533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werts, M.G., Zigmond, N., & Leeper, D.C. (2001). Paraprofessional proximity and academic engagement: Students with disabilities in primary aged classrooms. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 424–440.Google Scholar
Young, B., Simpson, R.L., Myles, B.S., & Kamps, D.M. (1997). An examination of paraprofessional involvement in supporting students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 31–38, 48. doi:10.1177/108835769701200104CrossRefGoogle Scholar