Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:06:49.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Saturday Leisure Club: A Means of Facilitating the Integration of the Disabled

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Extract

Providing out-of-school recreation programs for the disabled enables them to use their free time productively and provides a means by which they can be integrated into the community. Although the need to foster integration of the disabled is internationally acknowledged, in Australia there is a dearth of out-of-school recreation programs for the disabled in Australia where such integration can be promoted. To remediate this deficiency in the Illawarra Region, “The Saturday Leisure Club” was piloted to ascertain its feasibility and suitability. Non-disabled siblings of the disabled were included in this program, in order to achieve a first stage of integration, and to provide them with an opportunity to meet other siblings of the disabled so that they might discuss their socio-emotional difficulties with one another. Questionnaires were completed by parents of participants and the co-ordinators of the program after a 4-week pilot run in order to evaluate the aims of the Club and to assess the success of this pilot project. In addition, time samples of the pilot run were recorded on videotape so that a more objective evaluation of the success of integration of the disabled with their non-disabled peers could be obtained. To do this “integrative” and “isolative” behaviours and “positive enotional experiences” were measured by a specially designed checklist. Results of the questionnaires showed that, according to the parents and co-ordinators, the aims of the pilot run were achieved and the program was a success. Further, the analysis of the videotapes showed that there was an increase in “integrative” behaviour over the four weeks of the pilot run. As a consequence, the program was continued and the ultimate aim, of providing a permanent leisure program for under 18 year olds in the Illawarra Region, N.S. W., where integration of the disabled could be fostered, was fulfilled.

Type
Activities of Interest
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, R.J., Elkins, J., Berry, P.B., & Burge, J.A. A survey of special education in Australia: provisions, needs and priorities in the education of children with handicaps and learning difficulties. Fred and Eleanor Schonell Educational Research Centre, Department of Education, University of Queensland, July, 1979.Google Scholar
Bank-Mikkelsen, N.E. Normalization: letting the mentally retarded obtain an existence as close to the normal as possible. Washington D.C.: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation, 1969.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, J. The role, scope and development of recreation in Australia. Canberra: The Department of Tourism and Recreation, 1974.Google Scholar
Grossman, H.J. (Ed.) Manual on terminology and classification in mental retardation. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency, 1973.Google Scholar
Hallan, D., & Kauffman, J.M. Exceptional children, 2nd Edition, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1982.Google Scholar
Heaton, I.C., & Thorstenson, C.T. Planning for social recreation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1978.Google Scholar
Hutchison, P. & Priddy, P. Beginning recreation integration in a community. Leisurability, 1977, 4 (3).Google Scholar
Lowe, H. Philosophy and provision of recreational training for the intellectually handicapped in the division for the intellectually handicapped of the mental health services of W.A. In McIntyre, G. & Parmenter, T., Preparation for life: programs for mentally handicapped people in Australia in the 1980’s. Sydney: Prentice-Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Matthew, C. Leisure for the disabled: Camberwell Council’s Study. Royal Australian Planning Institute Journal, 1981, 19(1), 512.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.W., Clayson, L.M. Leisure and the retarded child. Pivot, 1979, 6 (4), 2023.Google Scholar
Telford, G.W., & Sawrey, J.M. The exceptional individual. 4th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Walsh, W.D., & Anson, J.G. Sport and recreation for the disabled. In the Commonwealth Schools Commission Report, Preparation of disabled young people for adult society. Canberra: Government Printers, 1981.Google Scholar
Ward, J. The 1981 world conference on actions, and — strategies for education, prevention and integration. Australian Rehabilitation Review, 1982, 6(3), 3541.Google Scholar
Wehman, P. Leisure skill programming for severely and profoundly handicapped persons: state of the art. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 17, 343353.Google Scholar
Wolfensberger, W. Societal integration as a corollary of normalization in normalization: the principle of normalization in human services. Toronto, Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation through Leonard Crainford, 1972.Google Scholar