Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T02:55:07.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of Effectiveness of Rewards and Punishments: A Comparison of High- and Low-Achievers in Secondary School

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Sam Winter ,
Leung Yuk-Wah  and
Ma Kwai-Heung
Sam Winter*
Affiliation:
Department of Education, University of Hong Kong
Leung Yuk-Wah
Affiliation:
Grantham College of Education, Hong Kong
Ma Kwai-Heung
Affiliation:
Northcote College of Education, Hong Kong
*
Enquiries or correspondence relating to this article should be directed to Sam Winter, Department of Education, University of Hong Kong, Pokpulan Road, Hong Kong.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two Hong Kong studies are described which investigate the perceptions of junior secondary school pupils (high- and low-achieving) concerning the effectiveness of rewards and punishments. Both studies employ versions of Caffyn’s questionnaire. Initial analysis reveals that (a) there is a relationship between disaffection and achievement, and (b) pupils of both achievement levels have more favourable perceptions regarding the effectiveness of rewards than they do of punishments. A focus on the relationships between achievement and perceptions reveals that (c) high-achievers perceive a large number of rewards as more effective than do low-achievers, (d) low-achievers perceive very few other rewards as being more effective than do high-achievers, and (e) the situation is a little more balanced for punishments. The paper includes a discussion regarding particular reward and punishment items perceptions about which differentiate low-and high-achievers. Finally, it is noted that there is a high level of consistency between findings in the two studies reported in this paper. Where it is possible to make comparisons with other research findings from Hong Kong and elsewhere, a high degree of agreement between such findings is found.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 15 , Issue 1-2: Contemporary Behavioural Perspectives in Special Education , 1992 , pp. 56 - 70
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branwhite, T. (1988). Sid Yobbo in the Temple of Doom: Adolescent Perceptions of Secondary School. Educational and Child Psychology, 5 (4), 153–158.Google Scholar
Burns, R. (1978). The Relative Effectiveness of Various Incentives and Deterrents as Judged by Pupils and Teachers. Educational Studies, 4 (3), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caffyn, R. (1987). Rewards and Punishments in Schools: A Study of their Effectiveness as Perceived by Secondary School Pupils and their Teachers. School Psychology International, 8, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreikurs, R., Grunwald, F., & Pepper, C. (1982). Maintaining Sanity in the Classroom. USA: Harper & Rowe.Google Scholar
Elliott, S. (1988). Acceptability of Behavioural Treatments: Review of Variables that Influence Treatment Selection. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 19 (1), 68–80.Google Scholar
Gulkin, T. & Hickman, J. (1988). Teachers’ Perceptions of Control over Presenting Problems and Resulting Preferences for Consultation Versus Referral Services. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 395–398.Google Scholar
Highfield, M. & Pinsent, A. (1952). A Survey of Rewards and Punishments in Schools. London: Newnes.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A (1980). Acceptability of Time-out from Reinforcement Procedures for Disruptive Child Behavior. Behavior Therapy, 11, 329–344.Google Scholar
Leung, Y.W. (1991). Rewards and Punishments in Schools - A Study of their Effectiveness as Perceived by Secondary School Students and Their Teachers. Unpublished MEd Dissertation. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Martens, B. & Meller, P. (1989). Influence of Child and Classroom Characteristics on Acceptability of Interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, B., Muir, K. & Meller, P. (1988). Rewards Common to the Classroom Setting: A Comparison of Regular and Self-Contained Room Student Ratings. Behavioral Disorders, 75(3), 169–174.Google Scholar
Martens, B., Peterson, R., Witt, J. & Cirone, S. (1986). Teacher Perceptions of School-based Interventions. Exceptional Children, 53 (3), 213–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martens, B., Witt, J., Elliott, S. & Darveaux, D. (1985). Teacher Judgments Concerning the Acceptability of School-based Interventions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16 (2), 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCuIlough, J. (1972). An Investigation of the Effects of Model Group Size upon Response Facilitation in the High School Classroom. Behavior Therapy, 3, 561–566.Google Scholar
McNamara, E., Harrop, A. & Owen, F. (1987). The Effect of Group Orientated Classroom Management Procedures on Individual Pupils. Educational Psychology, 7 (3), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrett, F. & Houghton, S. (1989). Does it Work with the Older Ones? A Review of Behavioural Studies Carried Out in British Secondary Schools since 1981. Educational Psychology, 9, (4).Google Scholar
Merrett, F. & Wheldall, K. (1987). British Teachers and the Behavioural Approach to Teaching. In Wheldall, K.’ (Ed.) The Behaviourist in the Classroom. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. (1987). An Educational Psychologist’s Intervention with a Class of Disruptive Pupils using Pupil Perceptions. Educational Psychology in Practice, 3 (2), 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, L., McNamara, E., & McPherson, E. (1986). The Use of Behaviour Modification in the Secondary School: A Further Development. Educational and Child Psychology, 3 (1), 4–14.Google Scholar
Sharpe, P. (1985). Behaviour Modification in the Secondary School: A Survey of Students’ Altitudes to Rewards and Praise. Behavioural Approaches with Children, 9 (4), 109–112.Google Scholar
Sharpe, P., Wheldall, K. & Merrett, F. (1987). The Altitudes of British Secondary School Pupils to Praise and Reward. Educational Studies, 13 (3), 290–302.Google Scholar
Throll, D. & Ryan, B. (1976). Teachers’ Attitudes towards Behaviour Modification. NewZealand Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 68–71.Google Scholar
Winter, S. (1991). Are Behavioural Classroom Management Approaches Appropriate to a Non-Western Education System? School Psychology International, 12, 211–223.Google Scholar
Winter, S. & Leung, Y.W. (1991). Perceptions of Effectiveness of Rewards and Punishments in Secondary Schools: The Perspective of the Disaffected Pupil. To be published in a forthcoming issue of Education Papers, Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zeidner, M. (1988). The Relative Severity of Common Classroom Management Strategies: The Student’s Perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar