Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:59:14.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microcomputer Applications Beyond Drill and Practice: New Challenges in Special Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Denise L. Wood
Denise L. Wood*
Affiliation:
The Crippled Children’s Association of South Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For over a decade microcomputers have been used to help students with special needs overcome physical, cognitive and emotional barriers to learning. In many cases microcomputers have extended the abilities of disabled students by the provision of alternative inputting devices and the use of programs that are highly interactive and individualised to suit the unique needs of students (Wood, 1986a). Rapid technological advances in recent years have opened up new horizons for disabled students. Powerful lap-top microcomputers with the capability of producing both printed and spoken output have provided speech impaired students with portable communication devices. Many students previously restricted to using software designed for special needs can now access a range of commercially available software through the use of devices such as the Apple Adaptive Firmware Card, and developments in the use of eye gaze and voice recognition as alternative input methods offer even greater promise for the future.

While it is an almost impossible task to accurately predict all the technological developments likely to occur in the future, there is little doubt that as microcomputers become more powerful, portable and affordable, many physical barriers to learning will be overcome. There are, however, many disabilities that are less evident than the more visible physical disabilities yet ‘…more insidious in their effects on educational progress’ (Clark, 1986, p. 28). For students labelled as ‘slow learners’ the barriers created by underexpectations which can limit learning opportunities may not necessarily be overcome by technological change. One of the major challenges facing special educators therefore is to review traditional educational practices and explore innovative ways for using microcomputers to overcome these barriers and enhance student learning.

Type
Challenge
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 1986 , pp. 29 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. (1985). Videotex and education: the challenge. In Ambrozek, J. (Ed.) The Edutel Book. Sydney: Australian Caption Centre, 133–135.Google Scholar
Bell, S. and Scott, I. (1985). Springboards: Ideas for Using Computers in the Classroom. Victoria: Nelson.Google Scholar
Budoff, M. and Hutten, L. (1982). Microcomputers in special education: promises and pitfalls. Exceptional Children, 49(2), 123–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, P. (1986). Computing aspects of interactive video. International Journal of Computers and Education, 10(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Chaffin, J., Maxwell, B. and Thompson, B. (1982). Arc-ed curriculum: the application of video formats to educational software. Exceptional Children, 49(2), 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakera, E. (1984). Contrasting approaches to the learning process in special schools. In Kelly, A. (ed.). Microcomputers and the Curriculum. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Clark, M. (March 1986). Educational technology and children with moderate learning difficulties. The Exceptional Child, 33(1), 28–34.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, E., Russell, S., Carter, C., Stokes, S., Sylvester, M. and Kelman, P. (1984). Computers, Education and Special Needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (ed.). (1984). Microcomputers and the Curriculum. London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kelman, P., Bardige, A., Choate, J., Hanify, G., Richards, F., Roberts, N., Tornrose, M. and Walters, L. (1983). Computers in Teaching Mathematics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Kolich, E. (1985). Microcomputer technology with the learning disabled: a review of the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18(7), 428–431.Google Scholar
McShane, R. and Dyson, S. (August 1985). Computerised information systems: developing search strategies. Classroom Computing.Google Scholar
Mokros, J. and Russell, S. (1986). Learner-centred software: a survey of microcomputer uses with special needs students, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(3), 185–190.Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weir, S., Russell, S. and Valente, J. (September 1982). Logo: an approach to educating disabled children. Byte, 346–360.Google Scholar
Williams, A. and Williams, R. (1986). Using microcomputer technology to develop reasoning abilities in special education students. The Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 18(4), 17–20.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (1986a). Designing microcomputer programs for disabled students. International Journal of Computers and Education, 10(1), 35–42.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (1986b). Computer courseware designed for students with special needs. The Australian Journal of Remedial Education, 18(4), 59–62.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (1986c). Island Tours. Victorian State Computer Education Centre. (Apple II version).Google Scholar