Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:38:55.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inclusion and Comprehensive School Reform: Lessons from the Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Alan Bain  and
Julie Lancaster
Alan Bain*
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University
Julie Lancaster
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University
*
Alan Bain, Charles Sturt University, Panorama Avenue, Bathurst, NSW, 2795 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sustaining comprehensive secondary school reform (CSR) represents an immensely difficult and unresolved challenge for the field. The problems associated with CSR are of significant concern to proponents of inclusion given that more responsive schools and classrooms are connected to, if not dependent upon, the success of broader school reform efforts. In this paper, we will employ the experience derived from a decade of practice in secondary school reform to interpret the findings from the CSR literature. We will extract lessons learned about the reform process to identify five key implications that seem to be preconditions for the success of comprehensive site-based reforms and lead to inclusive practice.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , 2006 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bain, A. (1994). The School Design Model Future School Institute at Brewster Academy Handbook. (Available from: The Endeavour Group, Academy Drive Wolfeboro, NH 03894).Google Scholar
Bain, A. (2000). The School Design Model: Strategy for the design of 21st century schools. In Dimmock, C., & Walker, A., (Eds.), Future School Administration, Western and Asian Perspectives (pp. 131–165). Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press and Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research.Google Scholar
Bain, A. (In press). Designing emergent feedback systems: Lessons learned from a ten year school reform initiative. International Journal of Educational Reform.Google Scholar
Bain, A., Huss, P., & Kwong, H. (2000). Evaluation of a hypertext discussion tool for teaching English literature to secondary school students. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, A., & Parkes, R.J. (In press). Curriculum authoring tools and inclusive classroom teaching practice: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Technology.Google Scholar
Bain, A., & Ross, K. (2000). School re-engineering and SAT-1 performance: A case study. The International Journal of Educational Reform, 9, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, M., & Dempsey, I. (2001). Enrolment and placement practices for students with special needs in NSW government schools: A critical analysis of current policy. Special Education Perspectives. 10, 3–14 Google Scholar
Berends, M., Bodilly, S.J., & Nataraj Kirby, S. (2002). Facing the challenges of whole school reform: New American Schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Berends, M., Nataraj Kirby, S.N., Naftel, S., & McKelvey, C. (2001). Implementation and performance in New American Schools: Three years into scale-up. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Bodilly, S.J. (1996). Lessons from the New American Schools development corporation’s demonstration phase. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar
Borman, G.D., Hewes, G.M., Overman, L.T., & Brown, S. (2002). Comprehensive school reform and student achievement: A meta-analysis (Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk Report No. R-117-D40005). Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.csos.jhu.edu Google Scholar
Brosnan, M. (1996). Make it new: Brewster Academy reinvents itself. Independent School, Spring, 12–16 Google Scholar
Carrington, S., & Elkins, J. (2002). Comparison of a traditional and an inclusive secondary school culture. Inclusive Education. 6, 1–16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, D. & and Kemp, C. (2002). Critical factors of successful transition to mainstream kindergarten for children with disabilities. Australasian Journal of Special Education. 26, 48–66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONnect (2004). Our approach: Data-driven solutions to improve instruction. Retrieved May 10, 2004, from http://www.co-nect.com/ourapproach/index.shtml Google Scholar
Cook, T.D., Habib, F., Phillips, M., Settersten, R.A., Shagle, S.C., Serdar, M., & Degirmencioglu, S.M. (1999). Comer’s School Development Program in Prince George’s County, Maryland: A theory-based evaluation. American Educational Research Journal 36, 543–597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, A.J. (1999). Market education: The unknown history. London: Transaction Publishers Google Scholar
Datnow, A. (2001). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Retrieved April 15, 2004, from http://www.usc.edu/dept/education/ceaov/publications/sustainabilitv.pdf Google Scholar
Davis, D.R., Ellett, C.D., & Annunziata, J. (2002). Teacher evaluation, leadership and learning organizations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 287–301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72, 433–479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimmock, C.A.J. (2000). Designing the learning-centered school: A cross cultural perspective. London: Falmer Press, Garland Inc.Google Scholar
Elkins, J. (2005). The school context. In Ashman, A. & Elkins, J. (Eds). Educating children with diverse abilities (2nd ed., pp. 37–64). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson.Google Scholar
Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, D. (personal communication, November, 20, 2000). Fashola, O.S., & Slavin, R.E. (1998). Schoolwide reform models: What works? Kappan Professional Journal. Retrieved May 20,2004, from http://www.Ddkintl.org/kappan/ksla9801.htm Google Scholar
Foreman, P. (2005). Disability and inclusion: Concepts and principles. In Foreman, P. (Ed) Inclusion in Action (pp. 2–32). Thompson: Australia.Google Scholar
Forlin, C. (1998). Inside four walls. The Australasian Journal of Special Education. 22, 96–106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtwengler, C.B. (1995). State actions for personnel evaluation: Analysis of reform policies, 1983-1992 Educational Policy Analysis Archives 3 , 1–27 Available http://www.olamed.asu.edu/epaa/v3n4.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geli-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
Goodlad, J.I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gore, J.M., Ladwig, J.G., & King, M.B. (2004, November). Professional learning, pedagogical improvement and the circulation of power. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Association of Research in Education, Melbourne, Vic.Google Scholar
Herman, R., Aladjem, D., McMahon, P., Masem, E., Mulligan, I., Smith O’Malley, A., Quinones, S., Reeve, A., & Woodruff, D. (1999). An educators’ guide to school-wide reform. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities, and software. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kameenui, E.J., & Camine, D.W. (2002). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. (2nd ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lipsky, D.K., & Gartner, A. (1997). Inclusion and school reform: Transforming America’s classrooms. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. & Leonard, P. (2001). Assessing aspects of professional collaboration in schools. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 47, 4–21.Google Scholar
Mastropieri, M.A. & Scruggs, T.E. (2004). The inclusive classroom. Strategies for effective instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, M.W., & Talbert, J.E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Milton, M., & Forlin, C. (2003). Supporting students with learning difficulties in secondary school. Special Education Perspectives. 12(1)31–46 Google Scholar
Muncey, D.E., & McQuillan, P.J. (1996). Reforms and resistance in schools and classrooms. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murnane, R.J., & Cohen, D.C. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why most merit pay plans fail and a few survive. Harvard Educational Review 56, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myron, G., & Applegate, B. (2000). An evaluation of student achievement in Edison Schools opened in 1995-1996 Retrieved August 10, 2002, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/edison/edisonevalexec.summary.html Google Scholar
North East and Islands Regional Education Laboratory (2000). Rhode Island Comprehensive school reform demonstration program: Year one evaluation report. Retrieved April 10, 2004, from http://www.allianc.brown.edu/pubs/RI Evaluation.pdf Google Scholar
Pascale, R.T., Millemann, M., & Gioja, L. (2000). The new laws of nature and the new laws of business. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Petrides, L.A., & Nodine, T.R. (2003). Knowledge management in education: Defining the landscape. Retrieved March 27,2005, from www.iskme.org/kmeducation Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Riner, P.S. (1992). A comparison of the criterion validity of principals’ judgments and teacher self-ratings on a high inference rating scale. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(2), 149–169 Google Scholar
Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting the culture of school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Slee, R. (2002). Developing theories and practices of inclusion in Australia. Exceptionality Education Canada 12(2&3), 103–123 Google Scholar
Stephenson, J. (2003). Inclusion of students with high support needs: The place of the special educator. Special Education Perspectives. 12(2), 13–33 Google Scholar
Tucker, P.D. (1997). Lake Wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (or, have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers)? Journal of Personnel Evaluation In Education, 11, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Villa, R.A., & Thousand, J.S. (2000). Setting the context: History of and rationales for inclusive schooling. In Villa, R. & Thousand, J. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (2nd ed., pp. 7–37). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Waldrop, M.M. (1993). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Touchstone, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar