Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T19:44:49.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing Spelling Performance of Students with Mental Retardation: Comparative Effects of Three Remediation Procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Vicky M. Anderson
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia, Commonwealth Institute for Child and Family Studies, Virginia
Nirbhay N. Singh*
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia, Commonwealth Institute for Child and Family Studies, Virginia
Theresa L. Moe
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia, Commonwealth Institute for Child and Family Studies, Virginia
Timothy J. Landrum
Affiliation:
Medical College of Virginia, Commonwealth Institute for Child and Family Studies, Virginia
*
Reprint requests should be directed to Nirbhay Singh, Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Virginia, PO Box 489, Richmond, Virginia 23289.

Abstract

We examined the comparative effects of three specialized remediation procedures on the spelling accuracy of students with moderate mental retardation. In the first experiment, we compared directed rehearsal and imitation training against a no-training control condition, in an alternating treatments design. Both procedures were more effective than a no-training control condition, and imitation training was marginally more effective than directed rehearsal. In the second experiment, we investigated further the effectiveness of imitation training by comparing its effects against interspersal training and a no-training control condition in an alternating treatments design. Although both procedures were more effective than no training, there was little difference between the two procedures, in terms of the students’ rate of learning new words. This study showed that these three specialized remediation procedures can be used to increase the spelling proficiency of students with moderate mental retardation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvidson Alphabetic Spelling List (1969). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Barlow, D., & Hayes, S.C. (1979). Alternating treatment design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 12, 199210.Google Scholar
Barrett, R.P., Matson, J.L., Shapiro, E.S., & Ollendick, T.H. (1981). A comparison of punishment and DRO procedures for treating stereotypie behavior of mentally retarded. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 2, 247256.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G. (1984). The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 41–64.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G., & Egel, A.L. (1982). Motivational techniques. In Koegel, R.L., Rincover, A., & Egel, A.L. (Eds.), Educating and understanding autistic children (pp106126). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.Google Scholar
Foxx, R.M., & Jones, J.R. (1978). A remediation program for increasing the spelling achievement of elementary and junior high school students. Behavior Modification, 2, 211230.Google Scholar
Grossman, H.J. (1983). Classification in mental retardation. Washington DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency.Google Scholar
Heron, T.E., Okyere, B.A., & Miller, A.D. (1991). A taxonomy of approaches to teach spelling. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jobes, N. (1975). The acquisition and retention of spelling through imitation training and observational learning with and without feedback. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: George Peabody College for Teachers.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M., Hallahan, D.P., Haas, K., Brame, T., & Boren, R. (1979). Imitating children’s errors to improve their spelling performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 33–38.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E., & Hartmann, D.P. (1978). The simultaneous-treatment design. Behavior Therapy, 9, 912–922.Google Scholar
Lenz, M., Singh, N.W., & Hewett, A.E. (1991). Overcorrection as an academic remediation procedure. Behavior Modification, 15, 64–73.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Treatment of spelling deficits in mentally retarded children. Mental Retardation, 20, 76–81.Google Scholar
Neef, N.A., Iwata, B.A., & Page, T.J. (1977). The effects of known item interspersal on acquisition and retention of spelling and sight reading words. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neef, N.A., Iwata, B.A., & Page, T.J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 75, 153158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ollendick, T.H., Matson, J.L., Esveldt-Dawson, K., & Shapiro, E.S. (1980). Increasing spelling achievements: An analysis of treatment procedures utilizing an alternating treatments design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 645654.Google Scholar
Singh, N.N., Deitz, D.E.D., & Singh, J. (1992). Behavioral approaches. In Singh, N.N. & Beale, I.L. (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Nature. theory and treatment (pp375414). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Singh, N.N., Farquhar, S., & Hewett, A.E. (1991). Enhancing the spelling performance of learning disabled students. Behavior Modification, 15, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, C.A., & Singh, N.N. (1986). Overcorrection of spelling deficits in moderately mentally retarded children. Behavior Modification, 10, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stowitschek, C.W., Jobes, N.K. (1977). Getting the bugs out of spelling or an alternative to spelling bee. Teaching Exceptional Children, 9, 74–76.Google Scholar