Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:28:46.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Educational Supports for Students with Disabilities and Significant Behavioural Challenges: Teacher Perceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Jerry Ford
Jerry Ford*
Affiliation:
Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined teacher perceptions of educational supports for students with disabilities and significant behavioural problems. Specifically, the study sought to (a) identify the types of behavioural problems displayed by students identified as exhibiting significantly challenging behaviour; (b) ascertain the types of supports and resources available to teachers to support students with challenging behaviours; and (c) elicit recommendations from teachers for how best to provide support for students with disabilities and significant behavioural challenges. Findings from the study indicated that the teachers were routinely being exposed to students who exhibited relatively high levels of significantly challenging behaviour. Teachers reported that they did not feel sufficiently prepared or supported to work successfully with such students and expressed the need for comprehensive, regular, and ongoing professional development activities that were aligned with their needs and those of their students. Despite the challenges encountered, the teachers expressed a strong commitment to assisting students with significant behavioural problems to achieve positive outcomes.

Type
Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , September 2007 , pp. 109 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algozzine, R. (1977). The emotionally disturbed child: Disturbed or disturbing? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 205–211.Google Scholar
Aman, M., Singh, N., Stewart, A., & Field, C. (1985). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist: A behavior rating scale for the assessment of treatment effects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485–491.Google Scholar
Anderson, J., Albin, R., Mesaros, R., Dunlap, G., & Morelli-Robbins, M. (1993). Issues in providing training to achieve comprehensive behavioural support. In Reichle, J., & Wacker, D. (Eds.), Communicative alternatives to challenging behavior: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 363–406). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Ayers, B., Meyer, L., Erevelles, N., & Park-Lee, S. (1994). Easy for you to say: Teacher perspectives on implementing most promising practices. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 84–93.Google Scholar
Bambara, L., Gomez, O., Koger, F., Lohrmann-O’Rouke, S., & Xin, Y. (2001). More than techniques: Team members’ perspectives on implementing positive supports for adults with severe challenging behaviour. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 213–228.Google Scholar
Billingsley, B., Bodkins, D., & Hendricks, M. (1993). Why special educators leave teaching: Implications for administrators. Case in Point, 7, 23–40.Google Scholar
Billingsley, B., Fall, A., & Williams, T. (2006). Who is teaching students with emotional and behavioural disorders? A profile and comparison to other special educators. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buell, M., Hallam, R., & Gamel-McCormick, M. (1999). A survey of general and special education teachers’ perceptions and inservice needs concerning inclusion. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, L., Ellis, L., & Wilson, M. (1994). Knowledge/skills needed by teachers who work with students with severe emotional/behavioral disorders: A revisitation. Behavioral Disorders, 19, 108–125.Google Scholar
Chalmers, S., Carter, M., Clayton, M., & Hook, J. (1998). Education of students with high support needs: Teachers’ perceptions of possible best practices, reported implementation and training needs. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 22, 76–94.Google Scholar
Chandler, L. K., & Dahlquist, C. M. (2002). Functional assessment: Strategies to prevent and remediate challenging behavior in school settings. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Crimmins, D., & Berotti, D. (1996). Supporting increased self-determination for individuals with challenging behaviors. In Lehr, D., & Brown, F. (Eds.), People with disabilities who challenge the system (pp. 379–402). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining ‘highly qualified teacher’: What does ‘scientifically-based research’ actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 3, 13–35.Google Scholar
Didden, R., Duker, P., & Korzilius, H. (1997). Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviours with individuals who have mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 101, 387–399.Google Scholar
Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1993). Assessment and intervention for children within the instructional curriculum. In Reichle, J., & Wacker, D. (Eds.), Communicative alternatives for challenging behaviour: Integrating functional assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 177–203). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Edelbrock, C. (1983). Problems and issues in using rating scales to assess child personality and psychopathology. School Psychology Review, 12, 293–299.Google Scholar
Emerson, E. (1995). Challenging behaviour: Analysis and intervention in people with learning disabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, I. M., & Meyer, L. H. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
French, N. (2003). Paraeducators in special education programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 36, 69–73.Google Scholar
Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Giangreco, M., Edelman, S., Broer, S., & Doyle, M. (2001). Paraprofesional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Teaching Exceptional Children, 68, 45–63.Google Scholar
Hastings, R., & Brown, T. (2002). Coping strategies and the impact of challenging behaviours on special educators’ burnout. Mental Retardation, 40, 148–156.Google Scholar
Hawley, W., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new concensus. In Darling-Hammond, L., & Sykes, G. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–149). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Horner, R., Carr, E., Strain, P., Todd, A., & Reed, H. (2002). Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: A research synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32, 423–446.Google Scholar
Horner, R., Diemer, S., & Brazeau, K. (1992). Educational supports for students with severe problem behaviors in Oregon: A descriptive analysis from the 1987–88 school year. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 154–169.Google Scholar
Jackson, L., & Panyan, M. (2002). Positive behavior support in the classroom: Principles and practices. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Kiernan, C., & Kiernan, D. (1994). Challenging behaviour in schools for children with severe learning difficulties. Mental Handicap Research, 7, 171–201.Google Scholar
Kiernan, C., & Qureshi, H. (1993). Challenging behaviour: In Kiernan, C. (Ed.), Research to practice: Implications of research on challenging behavior of people with learning disability (pp. 53–65). Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.Google Scholar
Knitzer, J. (1993). Children’s mental health policy: Challenging the future. Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 8–16.Google Scholar
Kretovics, J., Farber, K., & Armaline, W. (1991). Reform from the bottom up: Empowering teachers to transform schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 295–299.Google Scholar
Lang, M., & Fox, L. (2003). Breaking with tradition: Providing effective professional development for instructional personnel supporting students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1988). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Male, D. (2003). Challenging behaviour: The perceptions of teachers of children and young people with severe learning disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Education Needs, 3, 162–171.Google Scholar
Mayer, G. (1995). Preventing antisocial behavior in the schools. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 467–478.Google Scholar
McVilly, K. (2002). Positive behaviour support for people with intellectual disability. Sydney: Australian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability.Google Scholar
Merritt, F., & Wheldall, K. (1992). Teacher training and classroom discipline. In Wheldall, K. (Ed.), Discipline in schools: Psychological perspectives on the Elton report. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neel, R., Meadows, N., Levine, P., & Edgar, E. (1988). What happens after special education: A statewide follow-up of secondary students who have behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 13, 209–216.Google Scholar
Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Qureshi, H. (1994). The size of the problem. In Emerson, E., McGill, P., & Mansell, J. (Eds.), Learning disabilities and challenging behaviours (pp. 17–36). London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Reichle, J. (1990). National working conference on positive approaches to the management of excess behavior: Final report and recommendations. Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2000). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (Working paper no. 6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Rojahn, J. (1994). Behavior problems inventory. Columbus, OH: Nisonger Center for Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Sailor, W., Zuna, N., Choi, J., Thomas, J., McCart, A., & Roger, B. (2006). Anchoring schoolwide positive behavior support in structural school reform. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 18–30.Google Scholar
Scotti, J., Evans, I., Meyer, L., & Walker, P. (1991). A meta-analytic analysis of intervention research with problem behavior: Treatment validity and standards of practice. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 233–256.Google Scholar
Scotti, J., & Meyer, L. (Eds.) (1999). Behavioral interventions: Principles, models, and practices. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Sigafoos, J., Arthur, M., & O’Reilly, M. (2003). Challenging behavior and developmental disability. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (1994). Including students with severe behavior problems in general education settings: Assumptions, challenges, and solutions. In Marr, J., Sugai, G., & Tindal, G. (Eds.), The Oregon Conference Monograph, vol. 6 (pp. 109–120). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
Sugai, G., & Horner, R. (1999). Discipline and behavioral support: Practices, pitfalls and promises. Effective School Practices, 17, 10–22.Google Scholar
Taylor-Green, S., Brown, D., Nelson, L., Longton, J., Gassman, T., Cohen, J. et al. (1997). School-wide behavior support: Starting the year off right. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 99–112.Google Scholar
Walker, H. (1979). The acting-out child: Coping with classroom disruption. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, L., & Gargiulo, R. (1997). Occupational stress and burnout among special educators: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 31, 325–346.Google Scholar