Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T21:01:38.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education for All or for Some? International Principles and Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

Peter Mittler
Peter Mittler*
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Peter Mittler, School of Education, University, Manchester M13 9PL Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is axiomatic that people with intellectual disabilities have the same human and civil rights to education as other citizens and that they must therefore have the same opportunities to attend their local schools and educational facilities. This is a fine vision. But it is far from the reality experienced by the majority of people with intellectual disabilities across the world.

No country in the world has reason to be satisfied with the quality of the educational facilities which it provides for people with intellectual disabilities. But enough examples of good practice exist in different countries to make it possible for all of us to reappraise ways in which a higher quality of inclusive education and schooling could be provided for people with intellectual disabilities and the contribution that we can make personally and professionally to that process.

In the field of intellectual disabilities, we need to define education in very broad terms as anything which systematically promotes learning and development. Defined in this way, education is a lifelong process which neither begins nor ends with schooling. Similarly, it is carried out by many people who are not teachers. Parents are at the heart of this process from the outset. The years spent at school are clearly of vital importance but they are only one element of the educational process. There is a sense in which all work with people with intellectual disabilities is educational, whatever the setting, in so far as it helps them to learn and to develop knowledge, skills and understanding.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , January 1995 , pp. 5 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainscow, M. (1994). Special Needs in the Classroom: A Teacher Education Guide. London: Kinglsey; Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Corman, L. & Gottlieb, J. (1978). Mainstreaming Mentally Retarded Children: A Review of Research. In N.Ellis, , (Ed.), International Review of Research in Mental Retardation (Vol. 9). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cunningham, C. (1991). Down’s Syndrome: An Introduction for Parents. (2nd edn.) London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Department for Education. (1993). The Identification and Assessment of Special Educational Needs. London: D of E. Google Scholar
Hegarty, S. (1993). Meeting Special Needs in Ordinary Schools. (2nd edn.) London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Hegarty, S. (1994). Discussant In Hunt, M., op. cit. Google Scholar
Hunt, M. (1994). Planning and Diversity: Special Schools and their Alternatives. Stafford: National Association for Special Educational Needs. Google Scholar
Jenkinson, J. (1993). Integration of students with severe and multiple learning difficulties. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 8, 320–335.Google Scholar
Jowett, S., Hegarty, S., & Moses, D. (1988). Joining Forces: A Study of Links between Ordinary and Special Schools. Windsor: NFER-Nelson. Google Scholar
Jupp, K. (1992). Everyone Belongs. London: Souvenir Press. Google Scholar
Kirk, S. (1964). Research in Education. In Stevens, H., & Heber, R., (Eds.), Mental Retardation. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Google Scholar
Kisanji, J. (1995). Paper given to International Special Education Conference, Birmingham, UK, April 1995.Google Scholar
McBrien, J., Foxen, T., & Farrell, P. (1992). EDY Trainee Workbook and Instructors’ Manual: Teaching People with Severe Learning Difficulties. (2nd edn.) Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Mittler, P., Mittler, H., & McConachie, H. (1986). Working Together: Guidelines for Collaboration between Professionals and Parents of Children and Young People with Disabilities. Guides to Special Education No. 2. Paris: UNESCO. Google Scholar
Mittler, P. (1993). Teacher Education for Special Educational Needs. Stafford: National Association for Special Educational Needs. Google Scholar
Mittler, P., Brouillette, R., & Harris, D. (Eds.). (1993). World Yearbook of Education: Special Needs Education. London: Kogan Page. Google Scholar
Mittler, P. (1996). Self Advocacy and the Family. In O’Kane, J. Coupe & Goldbart, J. (Eds.), Whose Choice? Contentious Issues in the lives of Children and Adults with Learning Difficulties. London: Fulton Google Scholar
Mittler, P. & Farrell, P. (1987). Can children with severe learning difficulties be educated in ordinary schools? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 2, 221–236.Google Scholar
Nind, M. & Hewett, D. (1994). Access to Communication. London: Fulton. Google Scholar
O’Kane, J. & Smith, B. (Eds.), (1994). Taking Control: Enabling People with Learning Difficulties. London: Fulton. Google Scholar
UNESCO (1995). World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
UNICEF (1994). State of the Worlds Children. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar